Full-text

“Don’t go getting into trouble again!”
References

References

Andrews, J. Richard
2003Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman Publishing.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald and Rochelle Lieber
1991 “Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus-Based Study”. Linguistics 29 (5): 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Helen and Tony McEnery
2014Language Surrounding Poverty in Early Modern England: Constructing Seventeenth-Century Beggars and Vagrants. Lancaster: Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Sciences, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna and Spike Gildea
2015 “Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications”. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea (eds), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F.
1981Non-standard Language in English Literature. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Blánquez Fraile, Agustín
1954Diccionario Latino-Español. [‘Latin–Spanish Dictionary.’] Barcelona: Editorial Ramón Sopena S. A.Google Scholar
BNC BYU = Davies, Mark
2004–British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). URL: https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/bnc/
Bolinger, Dwight
1983 “The Go-Progressive and Auxiliary-Formation”. In Frederick B. Agard, Gerald Kelley, Adam Makkai and Valerie Becker Makkai (eds), Essays in Honour of Charles F. Hockett, 153–167. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe
2003 “On Two Distinct Uses of Go as a Conjoined Marker of Evaluative Modality”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds), Modality in Contemporary English, 103–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Rena Torres Cacoullos
2009 “The Role of Prefabs in Grammaticization: How the Particular and the General Interact in Language Change”. In Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali and Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds), Formulaic Language, 187–219. (Volume 1: Distribution and Historical Change .) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carracedo Doval, Juan José
2018Los paradigmas de imperativo de las lenguas indoeruropeas antiguas. [‘Imperative Paradigms in Ancient Indo-European Languages.’] (PhD thesis.) Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
CLMET3.0 = De Smet, Hendrik, Hans-Jürgen Diller and Jukka Tyrkkö
2013The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts. (Version 3.0.) Leuven: K.U. Leuven.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R.
2007A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson
(eds) 2018Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, Casper
2007 “ The king is on huntunge: On the Relation between Progressive and Absentive in Old and Early Modern English”. In Mike Hannay and Gerard J. Steen (eds), Structural-Functional Studies in English Grammar: In Honour of Lachlan Mackenzie, 175–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 “Constrained Confusion: The Gerund/Participle Distinction in Late Modern English”. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English Syntax, 224–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DOE = Cameron, Angus, Ashley Crandell Amos, Antonette di Paolo Healey et al.
(eds) 2018Dictionary of Old English: A to I online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. Available online at: https://​tapor​.library​.utoronto​.ca​/doe/
EEBO BYU = Davies, Mark
2017Early English Books Online. Part of the SAMUELS project. Available online at: https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/eebo/
Erman, Britt and Beatrice Warren
2000 “The Idiom Principle and the Open Choice Principle”. Text 20 (1): 29–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1996 “The Development of Gerunds as Objects of Subject-Control Verbs in English (1400–1760)”. Diachronica 13 (1): 29–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Drift and the Development of Sentential Complements in British and American English from 1700 to the Present Day”. In Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso and Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds), “Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed”: New Insights into Late Modern English, 161–235. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015 “Multiple Sources in Language Change: The Role of Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in the Formation of English ACC-ing Gerundives.”. In Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko and Jukka Havu (eds), Perspectives on Complementation: Structure, Variation and Boundaries, 179–205. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2016 “The Great Complement Shift Revisited: The Constructionalization of ACC-ing Gerundives”. Functions of Language 23 (1): 84–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “On the History of the English Progressive Construction Jane Came Whistling down the Street ”. Journal of English Linguistics 48 (4): 319–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1971 “Coming and Going”. In Charles J. Fillmore, Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis, 50–69. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Flach, Susanne
2015 “ Let’s Go Look at Usage: A Constructional Approach to Formal Constraints on Go-verb ”. In Peter Uhrig and Thomas Herbst (eds), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 231–252. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flick, Jane
1975Smollett’s Manipulation of Language in the Tabitha Bramble and Winifred Jenkins Letters in Humphrey Clinker. (PhD thesis.) Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
2012 “The Historical Syntax Problem: Reanalysis and Directionality”. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman and Andrew Garrett (eds), Grammatical Change. Origins, Nature, Outcomes, 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On Understanding Grammar. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2019Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Three Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar”. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson (eds), Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. (Second edition.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 “Lexicalization and Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Bjorn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from Its Components and Its Fringes, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2018 “Review of Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea eds. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar ”. Constructions and Frames 10 (1): 106–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, Mikko and Kaj Syrjänen
2016 “Corpus of Early American Literature”. ICAME Journal 40: 17–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Judith
2017Motion and the English Verb: A Diachronic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse”. Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Peter
2017 “Medieval Homelessness and Moral Judgment”. London: Institute of Historical Research, School of Advanced Study, University of London. Available online at: https://​strayvoices​.blogs​.sas​.ac​.uk​/2017​/12​/14​/medieval​-homelessness​-and​-moral​-judgment/
Kranich, Svenja
2010The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1974 “Syntactic Amalgams”. Chicago Linguistics Society 10: 321–344.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. (Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites ). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2005The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. (Volume 2.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McColm, Dan and Graeme Trousdale
2019 “Whatever Happened to Whatever?” In Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann (eds), Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2002 “Three Changing Patterns of Verb Complementation in Late Modern English: A Real-Time Study Based on Matching Text Corpora”. English Language and Linguistics 6 (1): 105–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Gerundial Complements after Begin and Start: Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Factors, and How They Work against Each Other”. In Günther Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, 329–345. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Noriko
2016Multi-Verb Sequences in English: Their Classification and Functions. PhD thesis. Kobe: Kobe University.Google Scholar
MED = Kurath, Hans, Sherman M. Kuhn and Robert E. Lewis
(eds) 1952–2001Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Available online at: https://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/m​/middle​-english​-dictionary​/dictionary
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960A Middle English Syntax: Part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online
Available online at: http://​www​.oed​.com/
Ogura, Michiko
2002Verbs of Motion in Medieval English. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter
2016 “Grammaticalization by Changing Co-Text Frequencies, or Why [BE-Ving] Became the ‘Progressive’”. English Language and Linguistics 20 (1): 31–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter and Freek Van de Velde
2018 “The Real-Time Dynamics of the Individual and the Community in Grammaticalization”. Language 94 (4): 867–901. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet and Freek Van de Velde
2018 “Constructional Contamination in Morphology and Syntax: Four Case Studies”. Constructions and Frames 10 (2): 269–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
PPCME2 = Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor and Beatrice Santorini
2000–The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English. (Second edition, release 4.) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española
2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Sintaxis II. [‘A New Grammar of the Spanish Language. Syntax II.’] Madrid: Espasa Libros, S. L. U.Google Scholar
Ringe, Donald and Ann Taylor
2014The Development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salkie, Raphael
2010 “On Going ”. In Bert Cappelle and Naoaki Wada (eds), Distinctions in English Grammar: Offered to Renaat Declerck, 169–190. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
2004Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spears, Arthur K.
1982 “The Black English Semi-Auxiliary Come ”. Language 58 (4): 850–872. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2000Grammaticization, Synchronic Variation, and Language Contact. A Study of Spanish Progressive -ndo Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2014 “Degeneracy: The Maintenance of Constructional Networks”. In Ronny Boogaert, Timothy Colleman and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, 141–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet and Lobke Ghesquière
2013 “Introduction: On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Special issue of Studies in Language 37 (3): 473–489.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957 “Verbs and Times”. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus
1963–1973An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wright, Susan
1994 “The Mystery of the Modal Progressive”. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 467–485. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar