Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

Politeness, speech acts and socio-cultural change

The expression of gratitude in the history of English

ORCID logo | University of Wuppertal
This paper studies the long-term diachronic development of the speech act of expressing gratitude in the history of English in Britain. The speech act underwent a considerable transformation from a religious-devotional practice and an expressive act with a high illocutionary weight addressed to a fellow human being towards a predominantly phatic routine in everyday conversation. Based on empirical data it is suggested that this development is characterised by the interplay of four processes: recontextualisation, functional expansion, attenuation/reduction of illocutionary force, and routinisation. Since, as will be shown, these changes run parallel to major changes in the organisation of society in the social history of Britain, they appear to be part of more general socio-cultural transformational processes that affected behavioural conventions, including politeness conventions and communicative routines.
Keywords: gratitude, politeness, social change, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Social history and diachronic speech act analysis
  • 3.Capitalism, development of the individual self and the expression of gratitude
  • 4.Method and database
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1General development of the frequency and function of expressions of gratitude
    • 5.2Period I: Expressing gratitude in feudalism
    • 5.3Period II: Early capitalism
      • Recontextualisation
      • Functional expansion
      • Attenuation
      • Routinisation
    • 5.4Period III: Modern capitalism
      • Recontextualisation
      • Functional expansion
      • Attenuation
      • Routinisation
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 29 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.21005.has
References (34)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational Routines in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Ooh Whoops I’m Sorry!”: Teenagers’ Use of English Apology Expressions”. Journal of Pragmatics 1421: 258–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnovick, Leslie. 2000. Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy. 1987. “How the Self Became a Problem: A Psychological Review of Historical Research”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1): 163–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Marc. 1964. Feudal Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph and T. Northcote Toller. 1921 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. (Online version.) Center for the Study of the Middle Ages, Charles University. Available online at: [URL]
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La Distinction. Critique Sociale du Jugement [‘ Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste ’]. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter. 1996. “Civilization, Discipline, Disorder: Three Case Studies in History and Social Theory”. Theoria 871: 21–35.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich. 2002. “Changing Politeness Strategies in English Requests: A Diachronic Investigation”. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio Oizumi, 17–35. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 49–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 2017 (1939). Über den Prozess der Zivilisation [‘ The Civilising Process ’]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Mark Dingemanse, Kobin Kendrick, Jörg Zinken and Nick Enfield. 2018. “Universals and Cultural Diversity in the Expression of Gratitude”. Royal Society Open Science 51: 180391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction”. Psychiatry 18 (3): 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Mattias. 2002. “ Thank You and Thanks in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal 261: 63–80.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 2012. “Changes in Politeness Cultures”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 422–433. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Speech Act Attenuation in the History of English: The Case of Apologies”. Glossa 4 (1): 45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret”. In Andreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 229–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2008b. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2002. “Towards a History of English Directives”. In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie and Hans Martin Lehmann (eds), Text Types and Corpora: Studies in Honor of Udo Fries, 165–175. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2008a. “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” In Andreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. “Linguistic Politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A Study of Old English Address Terms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 (1): 140–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytko, Roman. 1995. “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays”. In Andreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 515–541. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pollack, Detlef. 2015. “Varieties of Secularization Theories and their Indispensable Core”. The Germanic Review 90 (1): 60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for Theorganization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuck, Gerhard. 1999. “Theorien moderner Vergesellschaftung in den historischenWissenschaften um 1900. Zum Entstehungszusammenhang des Selbstdisziplinierungskonzeptes im Kontext der Krisenerfahrung der Moderne” [‘Theories of Modern Civilization in the Historical Sciences around 1900: On the Rise of the Concept of Self-Discipline in the Context of Crisis Experience of Modernism’]. Historische Zeitschrift 2681: 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Southall, Humphrey. 1991. “Mobility, the artisan community and popular politics in early nineteenth-century England”. In Gerry Kearns and Charles W. J. Withers (eds), Urbanising Britain: Essays on Class and Community in the Nineteenth Century, 103–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker. 2008. “Methinks You Seem More Beautiful than Ever”: Compliments and Gender in the History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 195–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Expressive Speech Acts and Politeness in Eighteenth-Century English”. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change, 159–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar