Article published In:
Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 3:1 (2002) ► pp.1–30
“Can innocent people be guilty?”
A sociopragmatic analysis of examination transcripts from the salem witchcraft trials
In this paper, I present a sociopragmatic method of analysing historical courtroom interaction, drawing data from Boyer and Nissenbaum’s (1977) Salem Witchcraft Papers. Concentrating as much upon the answers that the magistrates’ questions received as the questions themselves, I complement a grammatical analysis of question-types and their conducivity, with an analysis of responses in terms of Grice’s (1975) Cooperative Principle. I argue that (1) the magistrates’ questions appear to take on additional “controlling” and “accusing” functions, and (2) questions that functioned as accusations were particularly difficult to disprove, in part because the magistrates were responsible for “judging” the “legitimacy” of a “reality” their questioning strategy helped to construct. I demonstrate that the Salem magistrates adopted a “guilty but unwilling to confess” paradigm that led them to assume that defendants who maintained their innocence were lying, and then discuss the implications of reality paradigms for Grice’s (1975) theory.
Cited by
Cited by 25 other publications
Archer, Dawn
2011. Facework and im/politeness across legal contexts: An introduction. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
2011. Libelling Oscar Wilde: The case of Regina vs. John Sholto Douglas. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7:1
2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Archer, Dawn, Karen Grainger & Piotr Jagodziński
2020. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311], ► pp. 1 ff.
Archer, Dawn, Rebecca Smithson & Ian Kennedy
2018. Chapter 9. Achieving influence through negotiation. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 181 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019. Register, Genre, and Style,
Cecconi, Elisabetta
2008. Legal discourse and linguistic incongruities in Bardell vs. Pickwick: an analysis of address and reference strategies in The Pickwick Papers trial scene. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 17:3 ► pp. 205 ff.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2011. In Pursuit of an Expert Identity: A Case Study of Experts in the Historical Courtroom. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 24:4 ► pp. 471 ff.
2012. Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness testimony. Discourse & Society 23:5 ► pp. 465 ff.
2018. Dialogic features and interpersonal management in the early courtroom action game. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
Doty, Kathleen L.
2018. Chapter 1. Pleading for life. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 21 ff.
Doty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen
2009. Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial records of Salem, 1692. Journal of Pragmatics 41:3 ► pp. 458 ff.
Grund, Peter
2007. The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials1. Studia Neophilologica 79:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Jucker, A.H.
2006. Historical Pragmatics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 329 ff.
Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena
2012. “I am a Gosple Woman”: On Language in the Courtroom Discourse during the Salem Witch Trials, with Special Reference to Female Examinees. Studia Neophilologica 84:sup1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Kirk, John M.
2016. The Pragmatic Annotation Scheme of the SPICE-Ireland Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Kytö, Merja
2022. Coordination in the courtroom. In Earlier North American Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G66], ► pp. 37 ff.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Puyu Ning
2019. Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
Mcintyre, Dan
2004. Point of View in Drama: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Dennis Potter’s Brimstone and Treacle. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 13:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
2020. Point of view in drama: a socio-pragmatic analysis of Dennis Potter's Brimstone and Treacle. In The Language and Literature Reader, ► pp. 219 ff.
Petykó, Márton
2017. Discursive (re)construction of “witchcraft” as a community and “witch” as an identity in the eighteenth-century Hungarian witchcraft trial records. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
RISSANEN, MATTI
2003. SALEM WITCHCRAFT PAPERS AS EVIDENCE OF EARLY AMERICAN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 20:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
2012. Power and Changing Roles in Salem Witch Trials: The Case of George Jacobs, Sr.. Studia Neophilologica 84:sup1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann
2009. Tag Questions in English. Journal of English Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.