Subjectification and intersubjectification in Japanese
A comparative-typological perspective
This paper presents a “relativized” assessment of the analyses on subjectification and intersubjectification in Japanese presented in the four case studies (this issue), particularly through a comparison with Korean which shows remarkable similarity to Japanese in terms of morpho-syntactic structures and discursive practices.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2013.
Negotiating common ground in discourse: a diachronic and discourse analysis of maliya in Korean.
Language Sciences 37
► pp. 36 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2009.
What Is and Is not Language-Specific about the Japanese Modal System? A Comparative and Historical Perspective. In
Japanese Modality,
► pp. 87 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.