Commentary published in:
Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms
Edited by Yuen Yi Lo and Angel M.Y. Lin
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2] 2019
► pp. 315328


Bernstein, B.
(1999) Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology Education, 20(2), 157–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B.
(1988) Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (1st ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Chapin, S., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N.
(2013) Classroom discussions in Math: A teacher’s guide for using talk moves to support the common core and more, Grades K-6: A Multimedia Professional Learning Resource (third edition). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.Google Scholar
Gibbons, P.
(2003) Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Holton, D., & Clarke, D.
(2006) Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L.
(1990) Talking science: Language, learning and values: Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Lin, A. M. Y.
(2016) Language across the curriculum: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
(2007) Genre, ideology and intertextuality: A systemic functional perspective. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2(2), 275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, M. C.
(2012) Reading for evidence through hybrid adapted primary literature. In S. P. Norris (Ed.), Reading for evidence and interpreting visualizations in mathematics and science education (pp. 41–63). Rotterdam: SensePublishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M.
(1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, K. S.
(2011) Reassembling curricular concepts: A multimodal approach to the study of curriculum and instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Constructing scientific explanations through premise–reasoning–outcome (PRO): An exploratory study to scaffold students in structuring written explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1415–1440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S. J., Mensah, F. M., & Tang, K. S.
(2018) The content-language tension for English language learners in two secondary science classrooms. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Tang, Kok-Sing & Natasha Anne Rappa
2020. The Role of Metalanguage in an Explicit Literacy Instruction on Scientific Explanation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.