References
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S.
(1997) The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. C.
(2008) Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogden, R., & Biklin, S. K.
(2011) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Borko, H.
(2004) Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J.
(1981) The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles, CA: California State University, National Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L.
(1999) Educating teachers for the next century: Rethinking practice and policy. In G. A. Griffith (Ed.), The education of teachers: The ninety-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 221–256). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., Gardner, M., & Espinoza, D.
(2017) Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Deussen, T., Autio, E., Roccograndi, A., Hanita, M.
(2014) The impact of Project GLAD on students’ literacy and science learning: Year 1 results from a cluster-randomized trial of sheltered instruction. SREE Spring 2014 Conference Abstract. Retrieved from [URL].
Fortune, T. W., Tedick, D. J., & Walker, C.
(2008) Integrated language and content teaching: Insights from the immersion classroom. In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 71–96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Full Option Science System (FOSS)
(2015) Water and climate. Retrieved from [URL].
Gibbons, P.
(2003) Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37 (2), 247–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.
(1988) Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York, NY: Alemany Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, O., & Luykx, A.
(2006) Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Jacks, L., & Thaddeus, E.
(2006) Water: Third-grade curriculum. Albuquerque, NM: Project GLAD, Dual Language of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Migration Policy Institute
(2017) Children in U.S. immigrant families. Retrieved from [URL].
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N.
(1992) Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31 (2), 132–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, T.
(2016) Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content Based Language Education, 4 (2), 144–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics
(1997) America’s teachers: Profile of a profession. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
National Research Council
(2012) A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA)
(2004) National Science Teachers Association position statement. Retrieved from [URL].
Oliveira, A. & Weinburg, M. H.
(2017) Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orange County Department of Education (OCDE)
(2015) OCDE Project GLAD learning guide (2nd ed.). Costa Mesa, CA: Orange County Department of Education.Google Scholar
Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G.
(2012) Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science standards for English Language Learners: What teachers need to know. (Understanding Language Initiative) Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R.
(2003) Academic English: A conceptual framework. Irvine, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.Google Scholar
Shulman, L.
(1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57 (1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, M., Met, & Genesse, F.
(1989) A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (2), 201–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1996) Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 4 1, 529–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tong, F., Luo, W., Irby, B., Lara-Alecio, R., & Rivera, H.
(2015) Investigating the impact of professional development on teachers’ instructional time and English learners’ language development: a multilevel cross-classified approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20 (3), 292–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, C., Ranney, S., & Fortune, T.
(2005) Preparing preservice teachers for English language learners: A content-based approach. In D. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 313–333). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walqui, A., & van Lier, L.
(2010) Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. M.
(2011) Dual language programs on the rise. Harvard Graduate School of Education, 27 (2), 1–4.Google Scholar