Article published in:
Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms
Edited by Yuen Yi Lo and Angel M.Y. Lin
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2] 2019
► pp. 233260
References

References

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R.
(2011) Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R.
(2008) Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson, (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 91–114). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bell, J. C.
(2014) Visual literacy skills of students in college-level Biology: Learning outcomes following digital or hand-drawing activities. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, D.
(2011) Multimodal representation contributes to the complex development of science literacy in a college biology class. University of Iowa Iowa Research Online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D.
(1999) Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of research in education, 24, 61–100.Google Scholar
Chapin, S., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N.
(2013) Classroom discussions in Math: A teacher’s guide for using talk moves to support the common core and more, Grades K-6: A Multimedia Professional Learning Resource (third edition). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.Google Scholar
Chia, B. P., Tay, H. M., Ho, C., Ho, J., & Lee, G. B.
(2014) Scaffolding scientific explanation in Chemistry through language-specific support. In Lee, Y.-J., Lim, N. T.-L., Tan, K. S., Chu, H. E., Lim, P. Y., Lim, Y. H., & Tan, I. (Eds)., Proceedings from the International Science Education Conference (ISEC) 2014 (pp. 316–353). Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Chin, C.
(2007) Teacher questioning in Science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of research in Science teaching, 44(6), 815–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A. M., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K.
(2004) Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curriculum Planning and Development Division
(2016) Biology syllabus. Pre-university. Higher 1. Syllabus 8876. Singapore: Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, L.
(2004) Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 677–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Driver, R., & Easley, J.
(1978) Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
English Language Institute of Singapore (ELIS)
(2011) Whole school approach to effective communication in English. Retrieved from http://​www​.elis​.moe​.edu​.sg​/professional​-learning​/subject​-literacy
Esiobu, G. O., & Soyibo, K.
(1995) Effects of concept and vee mappings under three learning modes on students’ cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 971–995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, M., & Forman, E. A.
(2006) Refining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M.
(1983) Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M.
(1997) Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Jaipal, K.
(2009) Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis. Science Education, 94(1), 48–72.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C.
(2001) Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, 53(1), 5–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. K., & Reynolds, S. J.
(2005) Concept sketches – Using student- and instructor-generated, annotated sketches for learning, teaching, and assessment in Geology courses: Journal of Geoscience Education , 53(1), 85–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J.
(2013) Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G.
(2010) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C.
(2001) Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L.
(1990) Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1998) Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1998) Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lin, A. M. Y.
(2016) Language across the curriculum and CLIL in English as an additional language (ELAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.
(2018) Literacy challenges in chemistry: A multimodal analysis of symbolic formulas. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 205–218). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N.
(2013) Interthinking: Putting talk to work. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lo, Y. Y., & Macaro, E.
(2015) Getting used to content and language integrated learning: What can classroom interaction reveal? The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 239–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N.
(1995) The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C.
(2012) Talk science primer. Cambridge, MA: Technical Education Research Centers (TERC).Google Scholar
Michell, M., & Sharpe, T.
(2005) Collective instructional scaffolding in English as a second language classrooms. Prospect, 20(1), 31–58.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Education (MOE) & University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES)
(2015) Biology Higher 2 (2017) (Syllabus 9744). Singapore: Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board, MOE and Cambridge international Examinations.Google Scholar
Moje, E.
(2018) Foreword. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. v–vii). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Novak, J. D.
(1998) Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novak, J. D., & Wandersee, J.
(Eds.) (1991) Concept mapping [Special issue] Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., & Hall, R. H.
(2002) Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prain, V., & Hand, B.
(2016) Learning science through learning to use its languages. In Hand, B. & McDermott, M. (Eds.), Using multimodal representations to support learning in the Science classroom (pp. 1–11). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prinou, L., Halkia, K.
(2003) Images of cell division on the Internet. In Constantinou & Zacharia (Eds.), Computer based learning in science, New technologies and their applications in education (pp. 1103–1113). Nicosia: University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. R., & Tewksbury, B.
(2005) On the cutting edge. Exploring teaching strategies: Concept sketch. Retrieved from https://​serc​.carleton​.edu​/NAGTWorkshops​/coursedesign​/tutorial​/strategies​.html
Roam, D.
(2008) Back of the Napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Roth, W.-M.
(2005) Talking science: Language and learning in science classrooms. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Scwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J.
(2009) Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, P.
(1997) Developing science concepts in secondary classrooms: An analysis of pedagogical interactions from a Vygotskian perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds.Google Scholar
(1998) Teacher talk and meaning making in Science classrooms: A Vygotksyan analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S.
(2013) A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1),101–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamir, P.
(1985) Causality and teleology in high school biology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 3, 19–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, K. S.
(2016) The interplay of representations and patterns of classroom discourse in science teaching sequences. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2069–2095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Temple, S.
(1994) Thought made visible – the value of sketching. Co-Design Journal, 1, 16–25.Google Scholar
The Straits Times
(1983) It’s English for all. Alfred, H. & Tan, J. The Straits Times, p.1. Retrieved from NewspaperSG.Google Scholar
Tytler, R., & Hubber, P.
(2016) Constructing representations to learn Science. In B. Hand & M. McDermott (Eds.), Using multimodal representations to support learning in the Science classroom (pp. 159–181). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, S.
(2013) Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wise, N.
(2006) Making visible. Isis, 97(1), 75–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yip, C.-W.
(2009) Causal and teleological explanations in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 43(4), 149–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwiers, J., & Crawford, M.
(2011) Academic conversations: Classroom talk that fosters critical thinking and content understandings. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.Google Scholar