Article published in:
Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms
Edited by Yuen Yi Lo and Angel M.Y. Lin
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2] 2019
► pp. 212–232

Teacher language awareness and scaffolded interaction in CLIL science classrooms

| Sun Yat-sen University | University of Tasmania
| The University of Hong Kong
Teacher language awareness (TLA) constitutes the teacher’s self-reflective knowledge about the operation of language systems in pedagogical practices. This study focuses on teachers’ understanding of learning of language and learning through language in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) contexts, exploring how teachers proceduralise their knowledge of language to facilitate science learning in Hong Kong. By analysing the reflective relationship between TLA and scaffolding strategies of two teachers (students n = 31; 32) during a set of lessons in a secondary school, this paper suggests that it is critical to re-orient the TLA focus from teachers to the act of learning and learners’ needs. This expanded conceptual framework of TLA sheds light on how to transform teachers’ implicit knowledge of language into explicit awareness of scaffolding in class. The TLA-filtered, scaffolded interactions can therefore promote the use of language not merely for pedagogical purposes but also as a cognitive learning tool.
Keywords: Teacher language awareness, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), scaffolding strategies, learners’ needs, science classrooms
Published online: 25 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18023.xu
References

References

Andrews, S.
(2007) Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S., & Lin, A. M. Y.
(2018) Language awareness and teacher development. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 57–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., & Svalberg, A. M.-L.
(2017) Teacher language awareness. In J. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism. (pp. 219–231). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Chan, J. Y. H.
(2016) The fine-tuning medium-of-instruction policy in Hong Kong: A case study of the changing school-based test papers in science subjects. Education Journal, 44(1), 159–193.Google Scholar
Choi, P. K.
(2003) “The best students will learn English”: Ultra-utilitarianism and linguistic imperialism in education in post-1997 Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 673–694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
(2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edge, J.
(1988) Applying linguistics in English language teacher training for speakers of other languages. ELT Journal, 42(1), 9–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Education Bureau
(2009) Fine-tuning the medium of instruction for secondary schools. Hong Kong SAR: Education Bureau.Google Scholar
Evans, S.
(2013) The long march to biliteracy and trilingualism: Language policy in Hong Kong education since the handover. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 302–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fung, D., & Yip, V.
(2014) The effects of the medium of instruction in certificate-level physics on achievement and motivation to learn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1219–1245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, O.
(2009) Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibbons, P.
(2003) Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q.
(2018) Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, P.
(2003) Effective teaching of science through English in Hong Kong secondary schools. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holton, D., & Clarke, D.
(2006) Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, G. J., Skeet, J., & de Graaff, R.
(2014) Exploring content teachers’ knowledge of language pedagogy: A report on a small-scale research project in a Dutch CLIL context. The Language Learning Journal, 42 (2), 123–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
(2016) Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, K. M.
(2013) Exploring an invisible medium: Teacher language awareness among preservice educators of English language learners (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
(2016) Teacher language awareness among pre-service K-12 educators of English language learners. In J. Crandall & M. Christison (Eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp. 127–140). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., Baecher, L., & Tomas, Z.
(2013) Teacher language awareness in content-based activity design. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language, 1(2), 198–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., & Watkins, N.
(2015) Creating a culture of language awareness in content-based contexts. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 777–789. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liyanage, I., & Bartlett, B. J.
(2010) From autopsy to biopsy: A metacognitive view of lesson planning and teacher trainees in ELT. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1362–1371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Y. Y.
(2017) Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: Does professional development help? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. London: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D.
(2018) The effect of content and language integrated learning programmes’ intensity on English proficiency: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 18–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T.
(2018) Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regalla, M.
(2012) Language objectives: More than just vocabulary. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 210–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seah, L. H., Clarke, D., & Hart, C.
(2015) Understanding middle school students’ difficulties in explaining density differences from a language perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2386–2409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S.
(1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M.
(1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, M.
(2011) Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3): 325–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornbury, S.
(1997) About language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, T., & Bolitho, R.
(1993) Language awareness: A missing link in language teacher education? ELT Journal, 47(4), 292–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar