Article published In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language EducationVol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.53–73
Vol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.53–73
Exploring the lexical profile of young CLIL learners
Towards an improvement in lexical use
This paper presents an analysis of the lexical profile of the written assignments completed by a group of young CLIL learners. Participants in the study were attending 4th grade of Primary and had received around 714 hours of exposure to English. Results revealed lexical profiles which are characteristic of young learners of foreign languages with high frequency words being the most common. We also observed that learners show frequent instances of phonetic rendering, but little L1 influence for borrowings and relexifications. This can be a sign of the typical oral approach in CLIL classrooms. The young age, low proficiency, and short CLIL experience of the learners are taken into account in the interpretation of the findings. CLIL instruction revealed a positive effect on the initial development of lexical competence. The paper closes with a section that includes some suggestions for how to enhance lexical development within CLIL tuition.
References (25)
Agustín Llach, M. P. & Terrazas Gallego, M. (2012). Development and gender differences in a second language.
Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada
[Studies of English Applied Linguistics], 121, 45–75.
Celaya, M. L. (2006). Lexical transfer and L2 proficiency: A longitudinal analysis of EFL written production. In A. Alcaraz-Sintes, C. Soto-Palomo & M. C. Zunido-Garrido (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 29th Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos (AEDEAN)
[Spanish Association for Anglo-North American Studies] Conference
(pp. 293–297). Jaén, Spain: Universidad de Jaén.
& Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008, November).
CLIL, age, and L1 influence
. Paper presented at the 32nd AEDEAN Conference. Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
& Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2010). First languages and age in CLIL and non-CLIL contexts.
International CLIL Research Journal,
1(3). Retrieved October 7, 2013 from [URL].
Clark, E. (1980). Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words.
Papers and Reports on Child Language Development,
181. Retrieved December 16, 2012, from [URL].
Dalton-Puffer, D. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.),
Future perspectives for English language teaching
(pp. 139–157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
(2011). Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles?
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,
311, 182–204. 
.
.González Álvarez, E. (2004).
Interlanguage lexical innovation
. München: LincomEuropa.
Graves, M. F., August, D. & Mancilla-Martínez, J. (Eds.). (2012).
Teaching vocabulary to English language learners
. NY: Teachers College Press.
Hyltenstam, K. (1988). Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish.
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
, 91, 67–84. .
.Jiménez Catalán, R. M., Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. & Cenoz, J. (2006). Vocabulary profiles of English foreign language learners in English as a subject and as a vehicular language.
Vienna English Working Papers (VIEWS) ( Special Issue: Current Research on CLIL I
), 15(3), 23–27.
Johansson, V. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: A developmental perspective.
Lund University, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers
, 531, 61–79. .
.Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses.
The Open Applied Linguistics Journal,
11, 31–42.
Matiasek, S. (2005).
English as the language of instruction in Austrian chemistry lessons: Instance of explicit language teaching
. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Vienna, Austria.
Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies.
Pulso,
331, 11–29.
Miralpeix, I. (2006). Age and vocabulary acquisition in English as a foreign language (EFL). In C. Muñoz (Ed.),
Age and the rate of foreign language learning
(pp. 89–106). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Moreno Espinosa, S. (2009). Young learners’ L2 word association responses in two different learning contexts. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.),
Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe
(pp. 93–111). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Morgan, C. (1999). Teaching history in a foreign language: what language? In J. Masih (Ed.),
Learning through a foreign language: Models, Methods and Outcomes
(pp. 30–45). London: Grantham Book Services.
Palapanidi, K. (2012). El efecto del cambio del tema de composición en la interferencia léxica en la producción escrita de los aprendientes griegos de español. [The effect of change of topic on lexical interference in the written production of Greek learners of Spanish as a foreign language.]
Cuadernos de Italia y Grecia. Revista Mediterráneo
[Italian and Greek Notebooks. Mediterranean Journal], 41, 69–76.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. & Celaya, M. L. (2009, April).
CLIL instruction and foreign language competence in two bilingual communities
. Paper presented at the 27th International Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada Conference [Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics]. Ciudad Real, Spain, Universidad de Castilla-LaMancha.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. & Lasagabaster, D. (2010). The emergence of CLIL in Spain: An educational challenge. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (Eds.),
CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results, and teacher training
(pp. 9–17). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
Sylvén, L. K. (2010).
Teaching in English or English teaching? On the effects of content and language integrated learning on Swedish learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition
. (Published thesis.) Gothenburg, Sweden: ActaUniversitatis Gothoburgensis.
Xanthou, M. (2007, December).
Current trends in L2 vocabulary learning and instruction: Is CLIL the right approach?
Paper presented at the Greek Applied Linguistics Association 14th International Conference on Advances in Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching. Thessaloniki, Greece.
(2011). Current trends in L2 vocabulary learning and instruction: Is CLIL the right approach?
Advances in Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching: Selected Papers
(pp. 459–471). Athens, Greece.
Yaqubi, B., Rayati R. A., Gorgi, N. A. (2010). The involvement load hypothesis and vocabulary Learning: The effect of task types and involvement index on L2 vocabulary acquisition.
The Journal of Teaching Language Skills,
2(1),
Ser.
59(4), 145–163.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Fauzan, Rina Wahyu Setyaningrum & Suparto
2023. Pointed polysynchronous interactions in CLIL mathematics class during the COVID-19 pandemic: Translation, translanguaging, and trans-semiotizing. Cogent Education 10:1 
Vraciu, Alexandra & Anna Marsol
2023. Content-specific vocabulary in CLIL: Exploring L2 learning outcomes in a primary education programme in Catalonia. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882311700 ff.
Gallardo-del-Puerto, Francisco & Zeltia Blanco-Suárez
2021. Foreign language motivation in primary education students. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 9:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Rieder-Bünemann, Angelika, Julia Hüttner & Ute Smit
2019. Capturing technical terms in spoken CLIL. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Rieder-Bünemann, Angelika, Julia Hüttner & Ute Smit
2022. ‘Who would have thought that I’d ever know that!’: subject-specific vocabulary in CLIL student interactions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:9 ► pp. 3184 ff.
Jiménez Catalán, Rosa M. & M. Pilar Agustín Llach
2017. CLIL or time? Lexical profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners. System 66 ► pp. 87 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.