Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.96–118

Language ideologies and Cherokee revitalization

Impracticality, legitimacy, and hope

| University of Kansas
Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma has enacted a revitalization plan to promote Cherokee language in a variety of settings, and many tribal citizens have begun to confront how language factors into their identities as Cherokees. In particular, Tsalagi Dideloquasdi, the Cherokee immersion school, has become an important sociolinguistic site for the articulation of deeply seated beliefs and attitudes about issues such as the practicality of the language in contemporary times and who has a legitimate right to learn and speak the language. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate these attitudes and beliefs as well as the ideologies that inform them. Assuming a critical ethnographic stance, I examine the hegemonic discourses and structures that have led to the loss of Cherokee over generations as well as to three ideologies — impracticality, legitimacy, and hope — that influence the current efforts of the immersion school stakeholders.
Keywords: critical ethnography, language immersion, language ideologies, indigenous language revitalization
Published online: 17 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.1.05pet
References
Bender, M.
(2009) Visibility, authenticity, and insiderness in Cherokee language ideologies. In P. V. Kroskrity & M. C. Field (Eds.), Native American language ideologies: Beliefs, practices, and struggles in Indian country (pp. 123–147). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, B. J.
(1992) Language maintenance and language renewal among Cherokee people in Oklahoma. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics , 171, 109–124. Google Scholar
Cherokee Nation
(2003)  Ga-du-gi: A vision for working together to preserve the Cherokee language. Report of a needs assessment survey and a 10-year language revitalization plan. Final report submitted in fulfillment of fy 2001 dhs ana grant #90-nl-0189.
(2006) Cherokee Nation passes record budget for new fiscal year. Cherokee Nation News Release . Retrieved January 19 2014, from [URL].
Dauenhauer, N. M., & Dauenhauer, R.
(1998) Technical, emotional, and ideological issues in reversing language shift: Examples from Southeast Alaska. In L. A. Grenoble & L. J. Whaley (Eds.), Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects (pp. 57–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N. C.
(1998) Western language ideologies and small-language prospects. In L. A. Grenoble & L. J. Whaley (Eds.), Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enduring Voices
(2014) Disappearing languages. Retrieved January 19 2014 from [URL].
Fairclough, N.
(1989)  Language and power . Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Field, M. C., & Kroskrity, P. V.
(2009) Introduction: Revealing native American language ideologies. In P. V. Kroskrity & M. C. Field (Eds.), Native American language ideologies (pp. 3–28). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A.
(2001)  Can threatened languages be saved? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freire, P.
(1994)  Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (R. R. Barr, Trans.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
(1998)  Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S.
(1989)  Fourth generation evaluation . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Heller, M., & Duchêne, A.
(2007) Discourses of endangerment: Sociolinguistics, globalization and social order. In A. Duchêne & M. Heller (Eds.), Discourses of endangerment (pp. 1–13). NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hill, R., & May, S.
(2011) Exploring biliteracy in Māori-medium education: An ethnographic perspective. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 161–183). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinton, L.
(1994)  Flutes of fire: Essays on California Indian languages . Berkeley: Heyday Books.Google Scholar
(2001) Teaching methods. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 179–189). San Diego: Academic Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H.
(2006) Nichols to NCLB: Local and global perspectives on US language education policy. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and globalization (pp. 223–237). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A.
(1999)  Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica . NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2013) Minority language learning and communicative competence: Models of identity and participation in Corsican adult language courses. Language and Communication . [URL]
Krauss, M.
(1992) The world’s languages in crisis. Language , 68(1), 4–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Status of Native American language endangerment In G. Cantoni (Ed.), Stabilizing indigenous languages . Flagstaff: Center for Excellence in Education, Northern Arizona University. Retrieved January 19 2014 from: [URL].
(2007) Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.), Language diversity endangered (pp. 1–8). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G.
(1985)  Naturalistic inquiry . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, S.
(2013) Indigenous immersion education: International developments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education , 1(1), 34–69. DOI logo.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L.
(2002)  A place to be Navajo: Rough Rock and the struggle for self-determination in indigenous schooling . Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarty, T. L., Romero-Little, M. E., Warhol, L., & Zepeda, O.
(2011) Critical ethnography and indigenous language survival: Some new directions in language policy research and praxis. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 30–51). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L., Romero-Little, M. E., & Zepeda, O.
(2006) Native American youth discourses on language shift and retention: Ideological cross-currents and their implications for language planning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism , 9(5), 659–677. DOI logo.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L., & Watahomigie, L. J.
(1999) Indigenous education and grassroots language planning in the USA. Practicing Anthropology , 21(2), 5–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perdue, T., & Green, M. D.
(Eds.). (1995)  The Cherokee removal: A brief history with documents . Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Peter, L.
(2003)  A naturalistic study of the Cherokee language immersion preschool project . (PhD dissertation), University of Kansas. Google Scholar
Peter, L., Hirata-Edds, T., & Montgomery-Anderson, B.
(2008) Verb development by children in the Cherokee language immersion program, with implications for teaching. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 18(2), 166–187. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Peter, L., Sly, G., & Hirata-Edds, T.
(2011) Using language assessment to inform instruction in indigenous language immersion. In D. J. Tedick, D. Christian & T. W. Fortune (Eds.), Immersion education: Practices, policies, possibilities (pp. 187–208). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
S. 2167-101
(1990) Senate bill 2167--101st congress: Native American languages act. H.R. 5518–101. Retrieved January 19 2014, from [URL].
Smith, L. T.
(2012)  Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sturm, C.
(2002)  Race, culture, and identity in the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R.
(1990)  The Cherokees: A population history . Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B.
(1994) Language ideologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 231, 55–82. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Ballinger, Susan
2021. Oral Corrective Feedback in Content-Based Contexts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Hirata-Edds, Tracy & Lizette Peter
2016. Multi-competence and endangered language revitalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-Competence, ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Nassaji, Hossein & Eva Kartchava
2019. Content-Based L2 Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 597 ff. DOI logo
Palmer, Deborah K., Susan Ballinger & Lizette Peter
2014. Classroom interaction in one-way, two-way, and indigenous immersion contexts. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 2:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.