CLIL as a balance for female–male differences?
The effect of CLIL on student writing outcomes
This study examines female–male differences in English writing outcomes for Taiwanese primary school learners
enrolled in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) program. Narrative and expository writing samples of 212 primary
school students (Male = 103, Female = 109) in Taiwan were collected and scored using several measures including spelling accuracy,
correct word sequences, lexical diversity, total t-units, and a holistic rubric for ideas. Students’ topic interest was also
measured through a Likert-scale survey. The findings revealed differences between females and males and the two genres of writing.
While there were statistical differences attributed to gender and topic interest variables for some writing measures, further
analysis revealed that these effects were minimal in terms of practical significance. The paper raises questions about the
relationship between female–male writing differences and CLIL and provides suggestions for future research to broaden our
understanding and support diversity in the CLIL classroom.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Defining gender and sex
- 1.2Second language writing outcomes of females and males
- 1.3Content and language integrated learning and female–male differences
- 1.4Investigating writing as a multidimensional product
- 1.5The present study
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Setting and participants
- 2.2Data Collection
- 2.3Writing task scoring
- 2.4Data analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1Narrative writing
- 3.1.1Narrative spelling accuracy
- 3.1.2Narrative correct word sequences
- 3.1.3Narrative lexical diversity
- 3.1.4Narrative total t-units
- 3.1.5Narrative ideas rubric
- 3.2Expository writing
- 3.2.1Expository spelling accuracy
- 3.2.2Expository correct word sequences
- 3.2.3Expository lexical diversity
- 3.2.4Expository total t-units
- 3.2.5Expository ideas rubric
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References (46)
Acar, T.
(
2016)
Measurement of attitudes regarding foreign language skills and its relation with success.
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(4), 310–322.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S.
(
2002, 2002/08/01/).
Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: situational and individual interest.
Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411–428.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Babayiğit, S.
(
2015)
The dimensions of written expression: Language group and gender differences.
Learning and Instruction, 351, 33–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berninger, V. W., & Graham, S.
(
1998)
Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting.
Handwriting Review, 121, 11–25.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L.
(
1994)
Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing.
Advances in cognition and educational practice, 21, 57–81.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bijami, M., Kashef, S. H., & Khaksari, M.
(
2013)
Gender differences and writing performance: A brief review.
International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(2), 8–11.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Camacho, A., & Alves, R. A.
(
2017)
Fostering parental involvement in writing: Development and testing of the program Cultivating Writing.
Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(2), 253–277.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carroll, J. B.
(
1964)
Language and thought. Prentice Hall.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S.
(
2003)
Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cortes, V.
(
2019)
Considering the importance of L2 learners’ writing needs.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 461, 100679.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coyle, D.
(
2007)
Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cumming, A.
(
2016)
Theoretical orientations to L2 writing. In
R. M. Machón &
P. K. Matsuda (Eds.),
Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 65–88). De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Education Northwest
(
2013)
Grades K–2 Traits Rubric for Ideas.
[URL]
Fontecha, A. F., & Alonso, A. C.
(
2014)
A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction.
International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 21–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K.
Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q.
(
2018)
Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review.
Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, S.
(
2008)
Effective writing instruction for all students.
[URL]
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D.
(
2013)
Writing: Importance, development, and instruction.
Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 1–15.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D.
(
2015)
The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning.
Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B.
(
1986)
Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243–255.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kalali, N. N., & Pishkar, K.
(
2015)
Genre analysis and writing skill: Improving Iranian EFL learners writing performance through the tenets of genre analysis.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(6), 119–130.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamari, E., Gorjian, B., & Pazhakh, A.
(
2012)
Examining the effects of gender on second language writing proficiency of Iranian EFL students: Descriptive vs. opinion one-paragraph essay.
Advances in Asian Social Science (AASS), 3(4), 759–763.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, T. Y.
(
2010)
Socio-political influences on EFL motivation and attitudes: Comparative surveys of Korean high school students.
Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 211–222.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kobayashi, Y.
(
2002)
The role of gender in foreign language learning attitudes: Japanese female students’ attitudes towards English learning.
Gender and Education, 14(2), 181–197.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lahuerta, A.
(
2017)
Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL students enrolled on CLIL and non-CLIL programmes: The impact of grade and gender.
The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 121–132.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasagabaster, D.
(
2008)
Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses.
The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 11, 30–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lips, H. M.
(
2019)
Gender: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mady, C., & Seiling, A.
(
2017)
The coupling of second language learning motivation and achievement according to gender [Article].
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(12), 1149–1159.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMaster, K. L., Shin, J., Espin, C. A., Jung, P., Wayman, M. M., & Deno, S. L.
(
2017)
Monitoring elementary students’ writing progress using curriculum-based measures: Grade and gender differences.
Reading and Writing, 30(9), 2069–2091.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merisuo-Storm, T.
(
2007)
Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 226–235.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mori, S., & Gobel, P.
(
2006)
Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom.
System, 34(2), 194–210.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nair, S. M., & Hui, L. L.
(
2018)
An analysis of common errors in ESL descriptive writing among chinese private school students in Malaysia.
International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 28–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nation, I. S. P.
(
2009)
Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ningrum, A. S. B., Latief, M. A., & Sulistyo, G. H.
(
2016)
The effect of mind mapping on EFL students’ idea development in argumentative writing across gender differences and learning styles.
Dinamika Ilmu, 16(1), 149–166.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pae, H. K.
(
2014)
Forced choice or free choice?: the role of question formats in predicting speaking and writing skills of nonnative speakers of English.
Educational Assessment, 19(2), 97–115.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
(
2014)
How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research.
Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polio, C.
(
2019)
Keeping the language in second language writing classes.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 461, 100675.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roquet, H., Llopis, J., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
(
2016)
Does gender have an impact on the potential benefits learners may achieve in two contexts compared: Formal instruction and formal instruction + content and language integrated learning? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(4), 370–386.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Royston, P.
(
2004)
Multiple imputation of missing values.
The Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slattery, P.
(
2012)
Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability (3rd ed.). Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
StataCorp
(
2019)
Stata statistical software (
Release 16) [Computer software]. StataCorp LLC.
[URL]
Steinlen, A. K.
(
2018)
The development of German and English writing skills in a bilingual primary school in Germany.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 391, 42–52.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sunderland, J.
(
2000)
Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education.
Language Teaching, 33(4), 203–223.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tedick, D. J., & Cammarata, L.
(
2012)
Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives.
Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s28–s53.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A.
(
2009)
CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In
Y. Ruiz de Zarobe &
R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.),
Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, W., & Case, R. E.
(
2015)
Age-related differences in motivation in learning English among Mainland Chinese students.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 67–82.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Graham, Keith M.
2024.
Examining the criterion validity of curriculum-based measurement of writing (CBM-W) with young EFL learners.
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:2
► pp. 100108 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.