Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 11:1 (2023) ► pp.109–136

From EFL teacher to CLIL teacher in Estonia

Designing and implementing an in-service CLIL teacher training course for EFL teachers

ORCID logo | Narva College of the University of Tartu
 | Narva College of the University of Tartu
Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) has been adopted in many countries as an attractive methodology to enhance both subject and language teaching. Successful implementation of CLIL is preconditioned by the availability of qualified CLIL teachers, which can be ensured through both pre-service and in-service teacher training. The article introduces a case of designing and implementing an in-service training course of CLIL methodology for English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers in Estonia. The results of a one year-long longitudinal study of EFL teachers’ professional development in CLIL methodology (2018–2019) have been used to develop and implement a needs-analysis-based CLIL in-service training course for a wider community of teachers of English in Estonia (2019–2020). The approach to designing such a tailored in-service training course of CLIL methodology can be applied by teacher educators in other educational contexts and countries.
Keywords: content and language integrated learning, CLIL teacher training, continuing professional development, curriculum design, in-service teacher training
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.CLIL in-service teacher training: Research evidence
  • 3.CLIL-ing EFL teachers in Estonia: An in-service training model
  • 4.Research methodology
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Self-evaluation
    • 5.2SWOT analysis
    • 5.3Programme evaluation
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21009.rau
References (33)
References
Aiello, J., Di Martino, E., & Di Sabato, B. (2017). Preparing teachers in Italy for CLIL: Reflections on assessment, language proficiency and willingness to communicate. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20 (1), 69–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: Teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. LACLIL, 11 (1), 39–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. OUP.Google Scholar
Banegas, D. L., Poole, P. M., & Corrales, K. A. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in Latin America 2008–2018: Ten years of research and practice. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10 (2), 283–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT course: CLIL module. CUP.Google Scholar
Bertaux, P., Coonan, C. M., Frigols Martin, M. J., & Mehisto, P. (2010). CLIL Competence Grid. CLIL Cascade Network. [URL]
Brüning, C. I., & Purrmann, M.-S. (2014). CLIL pedagogy in Europe: CLIL teacher education in Germany. Utrecht Studies in Language & Communication, 27 1, 315–338.Google Scholar
Cinganotto, L. (2016). CLIL in Italy: A general overview. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9 (2), 374–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D. (2018). The place of CLIL in (bilingual) education. Theory Into Practice, 57 (3), 166–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, L., & Tanner, R. (2012). CLIL activities. CUP.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 216–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz Pérez, W., Fields, D. L., & Marsh, D. (2018). Innovations and challenges: Conceptualizing CLIL practice. Theory Into Practice, 57 (3), 177–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dvorjaninova, A., & Alas, E. (2018). Implementing content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in Estonia: Subject and language teacher perspective. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 14 1, 41–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francomacaro, M. R. (2020). The added value of teaching CLIL for ESP and subject teachers. International Journal of Language Studies, 13 (4), 55–72.Google Scholar
Karabassova, L. (2020). Is top-down CLIL justified? A grounded theory exploration of secondary school Science teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25 (4), 1530–1545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, N. K. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL program evaluation. Theory Into Practice, 57 (3), 250–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopriore, L. (2020). Reframing teaching knowledge in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A European perspective. Language Teaching Research, 24 (1), 94–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols Martín, M. J. (2011). European framework for CLIL teacher education. The European Centre for Modern Languages. [URL]
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2020). Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3 (1), 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavón Vázquez, V., Lancaster, N., & Bretones Callejas, C. (2020). Key issues in developing teachers’ competences for CLIL in Andalusia: training, mobility and coordination. The Language Learning Journal, 48 (1), 81–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Agustín, M. (2019). Meeting CLIL teachers’ training and professional development needs. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 9 (3–4), 119–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2016a). Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (2), 202–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: in-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19 (3), 266–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018a). CLIL and pedagogical innovation: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28 (3), 369–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b). Innovations and challenges in CLIL teacher training. Theory Into Practice, 57 (3), 212–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Personal Data Protection Act of the Republic of Estonia. (2018). [URL]
Pimentel Siqueira, D. S., Landau, J., & Albuquerque Parana, R. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL implementation in South America. Theory Into Practice, 57 (3), 196–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raud, N., & Orehhova, O. (2017). In-service training of teachers of English as a foreign language in Estonia: Mapping of trends and opportunities. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 75 (2), 194–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D. J. (2013, October 15–16). Immersion teacher education and professional development in the U.S. [Unpublished expert seminar paper]. Educational systems and immersion teacher education, Vaasa, Finland.
Tedick, D. J., & Lyster, R. (2020). Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Birman, Dina & Anastassia Zabrodskaja
2024. The relationship of the three “As” of adaptation: Acculturation, adjustment, and academic engagement of Ukrainian war refugees in Estonia’s schools. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 102 ► pp. 102034 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.