Article published in:
10th Anniversary Celebration
Edited by Pádraig Ó Duibhir and Laurent Cammarata
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:2] 2022
► pp. 207–229

A continuum of teacher collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of bilingual education programmes

| The University of Hong Kong
| The University of Hong Kong
| The University of Hong Kong

Bilingual education programmes are characterised by the use of students’ second/foreign/additional language (L2) as the medium of instruction for content subjects. In many educational contexts, such programmes are implemented by content subject specialists who have not received sufficient training in helping students master content and L2 simultaneously. Professional development is therefore necessary for this group of teachers. One potential professional development model is promoting collaboration between content and L2 teachers in the same school. Previous studies have explored different forms of cross-curricular collaboration, teachers’ attitudes and factors affecting its effectiveness. This paper seeks to extend the current discussion by investigating different models of teacher collaboration, based on a multi-case study of secondary schools adopting English (L2) as the medium of instruction for some or all subjects in Hong Kong. With various sources of data and cross-case comparison, this paper conceptualises a continuum of teacher collaboration in bilingual education programmes.

Keywords: bilingual education, teacher collaboration, professional development
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Teacher collaboration in bilingual education
    • 1.2Factors influencing teacher collaboration
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Overall research design
    • 2.2Research setting, selection of cases and informants
    • 2.3Data collection
    • 2.4Data analysis
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • 3.1Formal collaboration
      • 3.1.1Co-planning curriculum and teaching materials
      • 3.1.2Conducting lesson observations
      • 3.1.3Professional development (PD) opportunities
      • 3.1.4Informal collaboration among teachers
      • 3.1.5An English-rich environment with LAC/ English-related activities
      • 3.1.6The developmental stages of teacher collaboration
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21022.lo
References
Cammarata, L., & Haley, C.
(2018) Integrated content, language, and literacy instruction in a Canadian French immersion context: A professional development journey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21 (3), 332–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J.
(Eds.) (2018) Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators [Special issue]. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, A.
(2005) Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual classrooms. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davison, C.
(2006) Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9 (4), 454–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, C., & Lo, Y. Y.
(2016) Interdisciplinary collaboration to promote L2 science literacy in Hong Kong. In A. Tajino, T. Stewart and D. Dalsky (Eds.), Team teaching and team learning in the language classroom: Collaboration for innovation in ELT (pp. 94–111). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A.
(1994) Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Redwood Books.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T.
(2018) Leading collaborative professionalism. http://​www​.andyhargreaves​.com​/uploads​/5​/2​/9​/2​/5292616​/seminar​_series​_274​-april2018​.pdf
Lasagabaster, D.
(2018) Fostering team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level. Language Teaching, 51 (3), 400–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
(2010) Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT journal, 64 (4), 367–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N.
(2013) How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, D. C. S.
(2017) Multilingual Hong Kong: Languages, Literacies and Identities. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Little, J. W.
(1990) The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91 (4), 509–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo, Y. Y.
(2014) Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45 (2), 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) A glimpse into the effectiveness of L2-content cross-curricular collaboration in content-based instruction programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18 (4), 443–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Professional development of CLIL teachers. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
(2018) Introduction: Instructional practices and teacher development in CLIL and immersion school settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21 (3), 273–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinnari, K., & Bovellan, E.
(2016) CLIL teachers’ beliefs about integration and about their professional roles: Perspectives from a European context. In Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 145–168). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F.
(1989) A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (2), 201–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, M.
(2011) Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15 (3), 325–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D. J., & Cammarata, L.
(2012) Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45 (s1), s28–s53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trent, J.
(2010) Teacher identity construction across the curriculum: Promoting cross-curriculum collaboration in English-medium schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30 (2), 167–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E.
(2015) Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15 1, 17–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar