Article published in:
10th Anniversary Celebration
Edited by Pádraig Ó Duibhir and Laurent Cammarata
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:2] 2022
► pp. 230264
References
Airey, J.
(2016) EAP, EMI or CLIL? In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 95–107). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ball, P.
(2009) Does CLIL work? In D. Hill & P. Alan (Eds.), The Best of Both Worlds?: International Perspectives on CLIL (pp. 32–43). Norwich Institute for Language Education, Norwich.Google Scholar
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D.
(2003) Assessment for Learning: Putting it into practice. OUP.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 216–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Postscriptum: Research pathways in CLIL/Immersion instructional practices and teacher development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21 (3), 384–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Li, W.
(2014) Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, P., & Lin, A. M. Y.
(2019) Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept+ Language Mapping”. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7 (2), 261–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority [HKEAA]
(2014) Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) Biology Examination Report. Hong Kong Government Printer.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L.
(1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lin, A. M. Y.
(2016) Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22 (1), 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, A. M. Y., & Lo, Y. Y.
(2017) Trans/Languaging and the Triadic Dialogue in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Language and Education, 31 (1), 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, A. M., & Wu, Y.
(2015) ‘May I speak Cantonese?’–Co-constructing a scientific proof in an EFL junior secondary science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18 (3), 289–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, A. M. Y., & Wu, Y.
(2021) Leveraging on L1 content knowledge in CLIL assessment: Thematic patterns, cognitive discourse functions & genres. Keynote paper presented in the CLIL and Multilingual Research Forum, 11 December 2021, Beijing Normal University, China.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(2008) Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.Google Scholar
Morton, T.
(2020) Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3 (1), 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U.
(Eds.) (2016) Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
(2012) Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.Google Scholar
Tang, K. S.
(2020) Discourse strategies for science teaching and learning: Research and practice. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, K. S., Tan, S. C., & Yeo, J.
(2011) Students’ multimodal construction of Work Energy Concept. International Journal of Science Education, 331, 1775–1804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y.
(2021) Translanguaging/Trans-semiotizing in the flow of dialogic knowledge co-making in a CLIL biology class: A classroom discourse analytic study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
(2022) Towards an Integrative Model for CLIL: Implications of an analysis of a CLIL biology assessment task. Research notes presented at the Pokfulam Circle Study Group, University of Hong Kong, 9 April 2022.
Wu, Y., & Lin, A. M. Y.
(2019) Translanguaging and trans-semiotizing in a CLIL biology class in Hong Kong: Whole-body sense-making in the flows of knowledge co-making. Classroom Discourse, 10 (3–4): 252–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, D. Y., Tsang, W. K., & Cheung, S. P.
(2003) Evaluation of the effects of the medium of instruction on science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Performance on the science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27 (2), 295–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar