References
Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K
(2006) Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 12(1), 75–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso, E., Griselena, J., & Campo, A
(2008) Plurilingual education in secondary schools: Analysis of results. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 36–49.Google Scholar
Baker, C
(2002) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Berns, M., de Bot, K., & Hasenbrink, U
(2006) English, media and youth in Europe. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bonnet, G
(Ed.) (2002) The assessment of pupils’ skills in English in eight European countries. Paris: European Network of Policy Makers for the Evaluation of Education Systems.Google Scholar
Brown, H.D
(2000) Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Bruton, A
(2011a) Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal, and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 236–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 391, 523–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S
(1959) Modern languages aptitude test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C
(2011) Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., & Maljers, A
(2009) De enige echte vernieuwing: Tweetalig onderwijs [The only real innovation: Bilingual education]. In R. De Graaff & D. Tuin (Eds.), De toekomst van het talenonderwijs: Nodig? Anders? Beter? [The future of foreign language education: Useful? Different? Better?] (pp. 131–146). Utrecht: IVLOS.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 101, 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K
(2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language, 1(1), 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huibregtse, I
(2001) Effecten en Didactiek van tweetalig voortgezet onderwijs in Nederland [Effects and teaching methods in bilingual high school education in the Netherlands]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., & Meara, P
(2002) Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: Correction for guessing and response style. Language Testing, 19(3), 227–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D
(2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D
(2008) Foreign language competence in content and language integrated learning. Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 11, 31–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J
(2009) Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N
(1999) How languages are learned (Rev ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R
(2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P
(2005) Orientaciones para la elaboración del currículo integrado de las lengaus en los centros bilingües [Guidelines for the development of an integrated language curriculum in bilingual schools]. Seville, Spain: Consejería de Educación (Junta de Andalucía).Google Scholar
(2010) The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, F., Moore, P., & Casal, S
(2011) On complexity in bilingual research: The causes, effects, and breadth of content and language integrated learning — a reply to Bruton. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R
(1998) Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 481, 83–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D., Hau, K., & Kong, C
(2000) Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: Achievement growth in language and non-language subjects. Harvard Educational Review, 701, 302–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Buxton, B
(1987) An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4(2), 142–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F
(1998) Second language teaching theories. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Porte, G., & Richards, K
(2012) Focus article: Replication in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211, 284–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S
(2001) Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y
(2007) CLIL in a bilingual community: Similarities and differences with learning English as a foreign language. Vienna English Working Papers (Special issue: Current Research on CLIL), 16(3), 47–53., 16(3), 47–52.Google Scholar
(2008) CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque country. International CLIL Research Journal, 11, 60–73.Google Scholar
Schmid, M.S., Verspoor, M., & McWhinney, B
(2011) Coding and extracting data. In M.H. Verspoor, W. Lowie, & K. de Bot (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuitemaker-King, J
(2012) Teachers’ strategies in providing opportunities for second language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen,Groningen, Netherlands.
Seikkula-Leino, J
(2007) Assessing CLIL in primary school: A longitudinal study. Language and Education, 21(4), 328–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smiskova, H., Verspoor, M.H., & Lowie, W
(2012) Conventionalized ways of saying things (CWOSTs) and L2 development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Edelenbos, P
(2009) Tweetalig onderwijs: Beter geschoolde leerlingen in 2024 [Bilingual education: Better educated students in 2024]. In R. De Graaff & D. Tuin (Eds.), De toekomst van het talenonderwijs: Nodig? Anders? Beter? [The future of foreign language education: Useful? Different? Better?] (pp. 147–163). Utrecht: IVLOS.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Xu, X
(2011) The role of input and scholastic aptitude in second language development. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 86(2), 47–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M.S., & Xu, X
(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Learning, 21(3), 239–263.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, F
(2005) English in the Netherlands. A history of foreign language teaching 1800–1920. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Zydatiß, W
(2007) Deutsch-Englische Züge in Berlin (DEZIBEL). Eine Evaluation des bilimgualen Sachfachunterrichts in Gymnasien: Kontext, Kompetenzen, Konsequenzen [German-English Tracks in Berlin (DEZIBEL). An evaluation of bilingual subject teaching in secondary schools: Context, competencies, consequences]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 41 other publications

Baker, Doris Luft, Deni Lee Basaraba & Paul Polanco
2016. Connecting the Present to the Past. Review of Research in Education 40:1  pp. 821 ff. DOI logo
Kim Bower, Do Coyle, Russell Cross & Gary N. Chambers
2020. Curriculum Integrated Language Teaching, DOI logo
Bulté, Bram, Jill Surmont & Liesbeth Martens
2022. The impact of CLIL on the L2 French and L1 Dutch proficiency of Flemish secondary school pupils. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:9  pp. 3151 ff. DOI logo
Châu, Quang Hồng & Bram Bulté
2023. A comparison of automated and manual analyses of syntactic complexity in L2 English writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Dale, Liz, Ron Oostdam & Marjolijn Verspoor
2021. Towards a professional development tool for teachers of English in bilingual streams: the dynamics of beliefs and practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24:9  pp. 1288 ff. DOI logo
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Julia Hüttner & Ana Llinares
2022. CLIL in the 21st Century. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:2  pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Denman, Jenny, Erik van Schooten & Rick de Graaff
2022. Inclusive CLIL. AILA Review 35:2  pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Denman, Jenny, Erik van Schooten & Rick de Graaff
Esposito, Alena G. & Sangmi Park
2023. Chapter 9. Learning through bilingual education. In Understanding Language and Cognition through Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 64],  pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Feddermann, Maja, Jürgen Baumert & Jens Möller
2022. Just selection and preparation? CLIL effects on second language learning. Learning and Instruction 80  pp. 101578 ff. DOI logo
Feddermann, Maja, Jens Möller & Jürgen Baumert
2021. Effects of CLIL on second language learning: Disentangling selection, preparation, and CLIL-effects. Learning and Instruction 74  pp. 101459 ff. DOI logo
Goris, JA, EJPG Denessen & LTW Verhoeven
2019. Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal 18:6  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Goris, José, Eddie Denessen & Ludo Verhoeven
2019. The contribution of CLIL to learners’ international orientation and EFL confidence. The Language Learning Journal 47:2  pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Goris, José, Eddie Denessen & Ludo Verhoeven
2022. Determinants of EFL learning success in content and language integrated learning. The Language Learning Journal 50:1  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Hammou , Salah Ben & Abdelaziz Kesbi
2023. English medium instruction (EMI) in Moroccan secondary schools: Science teachers’ perception. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:2  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Hemmi, Chantal & Darío Luis Banegas
2021. CLIL: An Overview. In International Perspectives on CLIL [International Perspectives on English Language Teaching, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Jeffery, Jill V. & Catherine van Beuningen
2020. Language education in the EU and the US: Paradoxes and parallels. PROSPECTS 48:3-4  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Kemsies, Ronald & Georg Hellmayr
2023. Content and Language Integrated Learning. In Language Education Programs [Language Policy, 34],  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Kyle, Kristopher, Scott Crossley & Marjolijn Verspoor
2021. MEASURING LONGITUDINAL WRITING DEVELOPMENT USING INDICES OF SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY AND SOPHISTICATION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:4  pp. 781 ff. DOI logo
Lasagabaster, David
2019. Motivation in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Research. In The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning,  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Lee , Jang Ho, Hansol Lee & Yuen Yi Lo
2023. Effects of EMI-CLIL on secondary-level students’ English learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:2  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Mearns, Tessa, Rick de Graaff & Do Coyle
2020. Motivationfororfrombilingual education? A comparative study of learner views in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23:6  pp. 724 ff. DOI logo
Mearns, Tessa & Nivja de Jong
2021. Sketching a motivational landscape. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 9:1  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Mearns, Tessa & Rick de Graaff
2018. Bucking the trend?. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 6:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Oattes, Huub, Ruben Fukkink, Ron Oostdam, Rick de Graaff & Arie Wilschut
2022. A showdown between bilingual and mainstream education: the impact of language of instruction on learning subject content knowledge. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:2  pp. 756 ff. DOI logo
Oattes, Huub, Ron Oostdam, Rick de Graaff & Arie Wilschut
2018. The challenge of balancing content and language: Perceptions of Dutch bilingual education history teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 70  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Oattes, Huub, Arie Wilschut, Ron Oostdam, Ruben Fukkink & Rick de Graaff
2022. Practical solution or missed opportunity? The impact of language of instruction on Dutch history teachers’ application of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Teaching and Teacher Education 115  pp. 103721 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Cañado, María Luisa & Nina Karen Lancaster
2017. The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: a longitudinal case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum 30:3  pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Rousse-Malpat, Audrey, Lise Koote, Rasmus Steinkrauss & Marjolijn Verspoor
2021. Parlez-vous francais?Effects of structure-based versus dynamic-usage-based approaches on oral proficiency. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110402 ff. DOI logo
Rousse-Malpat, Audrey, Rasmus Steinkrauss, Martijn Wieling & Marjolijn Verspoor
2022. Communicative language teaching: Structure-Based or Dynamic Usage-Based?. Journal of the European Second Language Association 6:1  pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Roussel, Stéphanie
2019. Apprendre un contenu disciplinaire en langue étrangère : enjeux politiques, théoriques et pratiques pour l'internationalisation des formations dans l'enseignement supérieur. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l APLIUT :Vol. 38 N°2 DOI logo
Roussel, Stéphanie
2021. 2019 - « Apprendre un contenu disciplinaire en langue étrangère : enjeux politiques, théoriques et pratiques pour l'internationalisation des formations dans l'enseignement supérieur ». Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l APLIUT :Vol. 40 N°2 DOI logo
Roussel, Stéphanie, Danielle Joulia, André Tricot & John Sweller
2017. Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: A cognitive load theory approach. Learning and Instruction 52  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Smit, Nienke, Wim van de Grift, Kees de Bot & Ellen Jansen
2017. A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System 65  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Soroka, Olha, Ruslan Symchak & Nataliia Zakordonets
2023. PROSPECTS OF IMPLEMENTING BILINGUAL EDUCATION FOR THE TRAINING OF FUTURE SCIENCE TEACHERS. Grail of Science :27  pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Tedick, Diane J.
2020. Foreword. In Curriculum Integrated Language Teaching,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
van der Ploeg, Mara, Merel Keijzer & Wander Lowie
2023. Language pedagogies and late-life language learning proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
van der Ploeg, Mara, Wander Lowie & Merel Keijzer
2023. The Effects of Language Teaching Pedagogy on Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults. Behavioral Sciences 13:3  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Verspoor, Marjolijn
2017. Chapter 7. Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 pedagogy. In Complexity Theory and Language Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 48],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Wilgenburg, Onno van & Bas van Rooijen
2018. Expanding the field. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2  pp. 274 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.