Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 3:2 (2015) ► pp.194–217

Language attention in content-based instruction

The case of language instructors teaching content in a foreign language in Mexican higher education

 | Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco
Subject-matter specialists teaching content via a foreign/second language in higher education often exhibit a meaning-based pedagogy, unsystematically attending to inaccurate language. This observational study examined whether two foreign-language-teaching-trained instructors teaching content in English in a Mexican undergraduate program would emulate these instructional patterns, or would attend to language favouring language-and-content-integrated pedagogy. In the study, over 400 instructional episodes, video-recorded during 18 hours of regular-classroom teaching, were analyzed using the COLT observation scheme (Spada & Fröhlich, 1995). Results showed that the foreign-language educators favoured content, erratically attending to inaccurate language during communication breakdowns. Language attention occurred reactively through word translations, lexical-gap scaffolding, and isolated explanations for non-target phonological forms. These instructional patterns may result from the language teachers’ newly assumed content-based instructional roles. To favour language attention during subject-matter teaching, language instructors need training and curricular support that helps them draw on their foreign language teaching experience as they deliver content.
Keywords: CLIL, content-based instruction, English as a foreign language, second language pedagogy, Mexican higher education
Published online: 2 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.2.02ari
References (62)
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2008). Bilingual scientific literacy? The use of English in Swedish university science courses. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 71, 145–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Airey, J. (2011). Talking about teaching in English: Swedish university lecturers’ experiences of changing teaching language. Ibérica, 221, 35–54.Google Scholar
ANUIES (2007). Catálogo de carreras de licenciatura y posgrado. Mexico: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior [Catalogue of undergraduate and graduate studies. National Association of Universities and Further Education Institutions: Mexico]. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Ball, P., & Lindsay, D. (2013). Language demands and support for English-medium instruction in tertiary education. Leaning from specific context. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J.M. Sierra (Eds.), English-medium instruction at the university: Global challenges (pp. 44–61). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brinton, D., Snow, M., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, J., & Rodgers, T. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burger, S., & Chrétien, S. (2001). The development of oral production in content-based second language courses at the University of Ottawa. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(1), 84–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burger, S. (1989). Content-based ESL in a sheltered psychology course: Input, output and outcomes. TESL Canada Journal, 6(2), 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burns, A., & Richard, J. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chadran, J., & Esarey, G. (1997). Content-based instruction: An Indonesian example. In S. Stryker & B. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education. (pp. 222–236). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Corin, A. (1997). A course to convert Czech proficiency to proficiency in Croatian and Serbian. In S. Stryker & B. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 78–104). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, K., & Maloof, C. (2009). Evaluating the effects of CBI on an English for medical students program. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(1), 15–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 101, 543–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, A. (2006). Supporting talk? Partnership teachers in classroom interaction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 91, 434–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & I. Volkman (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching. Anglistische Forschungen, Vol. 3881 (pp. 139–157). Heidelberg, Germany: Winter.Google Scholar
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. (2013). Future challenges for English-medium instruction tertiary level. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J.M. Sierra (Eds.), English-medium instruction at the university: Global challenges (pp. 213–221). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Friedenberg, J., & Schneider, M. (2008). An experiment in sheltered sociology at the university level. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (Eds.), Realizing Content and Language Integration in Higher Education (pp. 155–168). Maastricht Netherlands: Maastricht University.Google Scholar
Greere, A., & Räsänen, A. (2008). Redefining ‘CLIL’ – Towards multilingual competence. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Grin, F. (2005, March). The value added of CLIL: A language policy evaluation approach. Paper presented at the conference: The Changing European Classroom — The Potential of Plurilingual Education. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Hernández, J., & Izquierdo, J. (In press). Metacognición y comprensión oral en L2: Estudio en nivel universitario [Metacognition & L2 oral comprehension: An observational study in the university context]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 18(1).
Hincks, R. (2010). Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca oral presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 291, 4–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hynninen, N. (2012). ICL at the micro level: L2 speakers taking on the role of language experts. AILA Review, 251, 13–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J. (2014). Multimedia instruction in foreign language classrooms: Effects on the acquisition of the French perfective and imperfective distinction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 188–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J., Simard, D., & Garza, G. (2015). Multimedia instruction and language learning attitudes: A study with university students. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 17(2), 101–115. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Izquierdo, J., & Collins, L. (2008). The facilitative effects of L1 influence on L2 tense-aspect marking: Hispanophones and Anglophones learning French. The Modern Language Journal, 93(iii), 350–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jochems, W. (1991). Effects of learning and teaching in a foreign language. European Journal of Engineering Education, 16(4), 309–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, L. (1997). The impact of content-based instructional programs on the academic progress of ESL students. English for Specific Purposes, 161, 309–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klee, C., & Tedick, D. (1997). The undergraduate foreign language immersion program in Spanish at the University of Minnesota. In S. Stryker & B. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 141–173). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kömür, S. (2010). Teaching knowledge and teacher competencies: A case study of Turkish preservice English teachers. Teaching Education, 211, 279–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kong, E. (2009). Content-based instruction: What can we learn from content-trained teachers’ and language-trained teachers’ pedagogies? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 661, 233–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Lyster, R. (2014). The influence of context on patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake: A comparison of CLIL and immersion classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 421, 181–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research methodology and design. NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Madrid, D., & García, E. (2001). Content-based second language teaching. In E. García Sánchez (Ed.), Present and future trends in TEFL (pp. 101–134). Almería, Spain: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Met, M. (1999). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. Washington, DC: The National Foreign Language Center.Google Scholar
Morales, D., & Izquierdo, J. (2011). L2 phonology learning among young adult learners of English: Effects of regular classroom-based instruction and L2 proficiency. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 13(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Myers, M. (2008). Code-switching in content learning. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (Eds.), Realizing content and language integration in higher education (pp.43–52). Maastricht Netherlands: Maastricht University.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). CLIL classroom discourse. Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the international and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R., & Bohlke, D. (2011). Creating effective language lessons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, D. (2006). Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 373–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 11, 60–73.Google Scholar
Smit, U. (2010). English as a lingua franca in higher education: A longitudinal study of classroom discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, B. (2006). Content-based ESL instruction: Long-term effects and outcomes. English for Specific Purposes, 251, 420–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). The communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme (COLT). Sydney, Australia: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lyster, R. (1997). Approaches to observation in classroom research: Macroscopic and microscopic views of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 311, 787–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stryker, S., & Leaver, B. (1997). Content-based instruction: From theory to practice. In S. Stryker & B. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 2–29). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Stryker, S. (1997). The Mexico experiment at the foreign service institute. In S. Stryker & B. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 177–202). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tatzl, D. (2011). English-medium masters’ programmes at an Austrian university of applied sciences: Attitudes, experiences and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101, 250–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Walt, C., & Kidd, M. (2013). Acknowledging academic biliteracy in higher education assessment strategies: A tale of two trials. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J.M. Sierra (Ed.), English-medium instruction at the university: Global challenges (pp. 27–43). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Vines, L. (1997). Content-based instruction in French for journalism students at Ohio University. In S. Stryker & B. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 119–140). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Vinke, A., Snippe, J., & Jochems, W. (2008). English-medium content courses in non-English higher education: A study of lecturer experiences and teaching behaviours. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(3), 383–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2013). English-medium instruction at a Dutch university: Challenges and pitfalls. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J.M. Sierra (Ed.), English-medium instruction at the university: Global challenges (pp. 3–24). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Dauzón-Ledesma, Leonor & Jesús Izquierdo
2023. Language Learning Investment in Higher Education: Validation and Implementation of a Likert-Scale Questionnaire in the Context of Compulsory EFL Learning. Education Sciences 13:4 ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Arias de la Cruz, Andres
2021. EFL Teachers’ Challenges to Write Content and Language Objectives for CBI Lesson Plans at a Mexican University. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 13:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Izquierdo, Jesús, Verónica García Martínez, María Guadalupe Garza Pulido & Silvia Patricia Aquino Zúñiga
2016. First and target language use in public language education for young learners: Longitudinal evidence from Mexican secondary-school classrooms. System 61 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. The COLT Observation Scheme [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 60], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.