References
Adler, J
(1998) A language of teaching dilemmas: Unlocking the complex multilingual secondary mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
Barwell, R
(2005) Integrating language and content: Issues from the mathematics classrooom. Linguistics and Education, 161, 205–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Mathematical word problems and bilingual learners in England. In R. Barwell (Ed.), Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives (pp. 63–77). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauersfeld, H
(1995) ‘Language games’ in the classroom: Their function and their effects. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 271–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berger, A
(2013) Mathematiklernen im bilingualen Diskurs: Ein integriertes Sprache-Mathematik-Modell des Lösens von Textaufgaben mit Englisch als Arbeitssprache. [Learning mathematics bilingually: An Integrated Language and Mathematics Model (ILMM) of word problem solving processes in English as a foreign language.] Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Blum, W., & Leiß, D
(2005) Modellieren im Unterricht mit der ‘Tanken’ - Aufgabe. [Mathematical modelling in the classroom by means of the “filling up“ task] Mathematik Lehren, 1281, 18–21.Google Scholar
(2007) How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics: Proceedings from the Twelfth International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood.Google Scholar
Borromeo Ferri, R
(2006) Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 86–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Wege zur Innenwelt des Mathematischen Modellierens: Kognitive Analysen zu Modellierungsprozessen im Mathematikunterricht. [Paths to the inner world of mathematical modelling: Cognitive analyses of modelling processes in mathematics lessons.] Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Teubner (GWV). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, P
(1992) Language and mathematics: A comparison of bilingual and monolingual students of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(4), 417–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Australian Vietnamese students learning mathematics: High ability bilinguals and their use of their languages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 641, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Mathematics teaching in Australian multilingual classrooms: Developing an approach to the use of classroom languages. In R. Barwell (Ed.), Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives (pp. 145–160). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J
(1976) Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskription (HIAT). [Heuristic Interpretative Auditory Transcription.] Linguistische Berichte, 451, 21–41.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A
(1993) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khisty, L
(1995) Making inequality: Issues of language and meanings in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Byrd Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Effective teachers of second language learners in mathematics. In M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 225–232). Utrecht: The Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J
(1985) Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoblich, G., & Öllinger, M
(2006) Die Methode des lauten Denkens. [The think-aloud method.] In J. Funke (Ed.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie – Kognition (pp. 691–696). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Levelt, W
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, J
(2003) Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson (Ed.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 215–234). Ottawa: Legas.Google Scholar
Liu, K.K
(2015) The influence of the math classroom context on students’ academic English production. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 127–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moschkovich, J.N
(2007) Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.Google Scholar
Novotná, J
(2004) Modelling the word problem solving process. An instrument to determine places suitable for teacher’s intervention. In H.-W. Henn (Ed.), Applications and modelling in mathematics education: Study Conference in Dortmund (Germany), February 13 - 17, 2004; pre-conference volume (ICMI study 14) (pp. 193–198). University of Dortmund, Department of Mathematics IEEM.Google Scholar
Novotná, J., Hadj-Moussová, Z., & Hofmannova, M
(2001) Teacher training for CLIL - Competences of a CLIL teacher. In M. Hejny & J. Novotná (Eds.), Proceedings SEMT 01 (pp. 122–126). Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogicka fakulta. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K.L
(2005) Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pimm, D
(1987) Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T
(1994) First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reusser, K
(1985) From situation to equation. On formulation understanding and solving “situation problems”. Technical Report 143. Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
(1997) Erwerb mathematischer Kompetenzen: Literaturüberblick. Mathematische Textaufgaben als Unterrichts- und Forschungsgegenstand. [Aquisition of mathematical competences: Literature review. Mathematical word problems as an object of teaching and research.] In F.E. Weinert & A. Helmke (Eds.), Entwicklung im Grundschulalter (pp. 141–155). Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie-Verl.-Union.Google Scholar
Setati, M., & Adler, J
(2001) Between languages and discourses: Code switching practices in primary classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 431, 243–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sfard, A
(2001) Learning mathematics as developing a discourse. In R. Speiser, C. Maher, & C. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of 21st Conference of PME-NA (pp. 23–44). Columbus, OH: Clearing House for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
(2008) Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sfard, A., & Lavie, I
(2005) Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different? - Early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 237–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Turnbull, M., Hart, D., & Lapkin, S
(2000) French immersion students’ performance on grade 3 provincial tests: Potential impacts on program design. Final report submitted to the Education Quality and Accountability Office. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Weir, C., & Khalifa, H
(2008) A cognitive processing approach towards defining reading comprehension. Cambridge ESOL: Research notes, 311, 2–10.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Ballinger, Susan, Roy Lyster, Andrea Sterzuk & Fred Genesee
2017. Context-appropriate crosslinguistic pedagogy. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 5:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Jorge, Elvira Fernández-Ahumada & Natividad Adamuz-Povedano
2022. Textbooks for Bilingual Mathematics Classrooms. In Handbook of Research on International Approaches and Practices for Gamifying Mathematics [Advances in Game-Based Learning, ],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Lyster, Roy
2017. Content-Based Language Teaching. In Content-Based Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Cecilia, Raúl, Leopoldo Medina-Sánchez & Antonio-Manuel Rodríguez-García
2023. Teaching and Learning of Mathematics through CLIL, CBI, or EMI—A Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics 11:6  pp. 1347 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.