Article published in:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 5:1 (2017) ► pp. 5886

Full-text

Balancing content and language in CLIL
References

References

Alejo, R., & Piquer Píriz, A. M.
(2010) CLIL teacher training in Extremadura: A needs analysis perspective. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain. Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 219–42). Newcastel upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bell, N.D., & Lorenzi, D.
(2004) Facilitating second language acquisition in elementary and secondary physical education classes. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 75(6), 46–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Block, B.A.
(2001) Literacy through movement: An organizational approach. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72(1), 39–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, D., Snow, M.A., & Wesche M.B.
(2003) Content-based second language instruction (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2001) Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D.J.
(2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
(2015) Learning through a second or additional language: Content-based instruction and CLIL in the twenty-first century. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
(2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christopher, A.A., Dzakiria, H.B. & Mohamed, A.H.
(2012) Teaching English through sports: A case study. Asian EFL Journal, 59, 20–29.Google Scholar
Clancy, M.E., & Hruska, B.L.
(2005) Developing language objectives for English language learners in physical education lessons. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance JOPERD, 76(4), 30–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cloud, N., Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E.
(2000) Dual language instruction: A handbook for enriched education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Mannion, L., & Morrison, K.
(2000) Research methods in education (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, European
(2013) Physical education and sport at school in Europe Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Eurydice.Google Scholar
Coral, J.
(2010) L’aprenentatge de l’anglès a través de l’educació física: El programa, Mou-te iaprèn. [English language acquisition through physical education].Temps d’Educació, 39, 149–170.Google Scholar
Coyle, D.
(2002) Against all odds: Lesson from content and language integrated learning in English secondary schools. In W.C. Daniel & G.M. Jones (Eds.), Education and society in plurilingual contexts (pp. 37–55). Brussels: Brussels University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543–562.Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
(2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W.
(2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2007) Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U.
(Eds.) (2007) Critical perspectives in CLIL classroom discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U.
(2010) Language use and language learning in CLIL: Current findings and contentious issues. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 279–291). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R.
(2016) Sociocultural theory and content-based foreign language instruction. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 25–51). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Graaff, R., Koopman, G.J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G.
(2007) An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603–624.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Skills
(2005) Beginning to teach: Newly qualified teachers in primary schools. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
(2007) Irish in the primary school: Inspectorate evaluation studies. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
(2011) Literacy and numeracy for learning and life: The national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 2011–2020. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
(2013) Chief Inspector‘s Report 2010–2012. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Devos, N.
(2012) Content and language integrated learning in physical education: Evidence for language and content scaffolding during peer interaction. In P. Lennon (Ed.), Learner uutonomy in the English classroom: Empirical studies and ideas for teachers (pp. 359–381). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.
(2014) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T., & Mandigo, J.
(2012) The primary schoolteacher and physical education: A review of research and implications for Irish physical education. Irish Educational Studies, 31(3), 363–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallardo del Puerto, F., Gómez Lacabex, E., & García Lecumberri, M.L.
(2009) Testing the effectiveness of content and language integrated learning in foreign language contexts: The assessment of English pronunciation. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 63–80). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K.
(2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, C.L., & Jiménez-Silva, M.
(2012) The physical educator as a language teacher for English language learners. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 25(4), 14–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Government of Ireland
(1999a) Primary school curriculum: Introduction. Dublin: The Stationary Office, Government Publications.Google Scholar
(1999b) The primary physical education school curriculum. Dublin: The Stationary Office, Government Publications.Google Scholar
(1999c) The primary physical education curriculum: Teacher guidelines. Dublin: The Stationary Office, Government Publications.Google Scholar
(2010) The 20 year strategy for the Irish language 2010–2030. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
Grin, F.
(2005)  Added value of CLIL . Paper presented at the Changing European Classroom – The Potential of Plurilingual Education Conference , Luxembourg.
Guba, E.
(1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75–91.Google Scholar
Harris, J.
(1984) Spoken Irish in primary schools. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
(1988) Spoken Irish in the primary school system. The International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 70, 69–87.Google Scholar
(1991) The contribution of primary schools to the maintainence of Irish. In S. Kroon & Jaspaert, K. (Eds.), Ethnic minority languages and education (pp. 87–105). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
(2007) National trends in achievement in Irish listening at primary level: A challenge for language revitalisation and language policy. In M. Conrick & M. Howard (Eds.), From applied linguistics to linguistics applied: Issues, practices, trends (Vol. 22, pp. 25–42). London: British Association of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Harris, J., Forde, P., Archer, P., Nic Fhearaile, S., & O’ Gorman, M.
(2006) Irish in primary schools – Long term national trends in achievement. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
Harris, J., & Murtagh, L.
(1999) Teaching and learning Irish in primary schools. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
Harris, J., & Ó Duibhir, P.
(2011) Effective language teaching: A synthesis of research. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.Google Scholar
Humphries, C.A., Bidner, S., & Edwards, C.
(2011) Integrated learning with physical education and music. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 174–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, C.C., Irwin, R.L., & Hays, B.
(2011) Integrative curriculum program for physical education: Classroom on the court. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 25(2), 14–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jäppinen, A.K.
(2006) CLIL and future learning. In S. Björklund, K. Mård-Miettinen, M. Bergström, & M. Södergård, (Eds.), Exploring dual-focussed education: Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs (pp. 22–38) Retrieved from http://​www​.uva​.fi​/materiaali​/pdf​/isbn​_952​-476​-149​-1​.pdf Google Scholar
Kirk, D., MacDonald, D., & O’ Sullivan, M.
(Eds.) (2006) The handbook of physical education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lamsfuß-Schenk
(2002) Geschichte und Sprache – Ist der bilinguale Geschichtsunterricht der Königsweg zum Geschichtsbewusstsein? [History and language – Is bilingual teaching and learning of history the best way towards historical awareness?]. In Breidbach, S., G. Bach & D. Wolff (Eds.), Bilingualer Sachfachunterricht: Didaktik, Lehrer-/Lernerforschung und Bildungspolitik zwischen Theorie und Empirie [Bilingual subject instruction: Didactics, research on teachers/learners and educational policies between theory and empiricism] (pp. 191–206). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lieberman, L.J., Columna, L., de la Vega Mansilla, P., & Martinez Taylor, C.
(2010) Infusing sign language and Spanish into physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance (JOPERD), 81(4), 45–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.M.
(2014) Focus on content-based language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
(2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D.
(Ed.) (2002) CLIL/EMILE: The European dimension. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., Hau, K., & Kong, S.
(2000) Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: Achievement growth in language and non-language subjects. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 302–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols, Martín, M.
(2010) The European framework for CLIL teacher education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Martínez Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez Mangado, M.J.
(2009) The acquisition of English syntax by CLIL learners in the Basque country. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 176–196). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C.
(2014) Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualization and evaluation of test tasks. Language Learning Journal, 42, 137–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehisto, P.
(2008) CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 93–119.Google Scholar
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.J.
(2008) Uncovering CLIL. London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Met, M.
(1999) Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. College Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center.Google Scholar
Moreno Espinosa, S.
(2009) Young learners’ L2 word association responses in two different learning contexts. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 93–111). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment
Navés, T.
(2002) Successful CLIL programmes in Navés. In G. Langé & P. Bertaux (Eds.), The CLIL professional development course (pp. 93–102). Milan: Ministero della’ Instruzione della’ Universitá e della Ricerca.Google Scholar
(2009) Effective content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes. In Y. Ruiz Zarobe & R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 22–41). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ní Chróinín, D., Ní Mhurchú, S., & Ó Ceallaigh, T.J.
(2016) Off-balance: The integration of physical education content learning and Irish language learning in English-medium primary schools in Ireland. Education 3–13, International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ó Ceallaigh T.J., & Ní Dhonnabháin, A.
(2015) Reawakening the Irish language through the education system: Challenges and priorities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 179–198.Google Scholar
Ó Muimhneacháin, C.
(2010) Lámha in Airde [Hands Up]. Cork: Prisma Print.Google Scholar
Pérez-Cañado, M.L.
(2012) CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., & Juan-Garau, M.
(2010) To CLIL or not to CLIL: From bilingualism to multilingualism in Catalan/Spanish communities. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain:Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 115–38). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Phillips, S.R., & Silverman, S.
(2015) Upper elementary school student attitudes toward physical education. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 34(3), 219–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rottmann, B.
(2007) Sports in English: Learning opportunities through CLIL in physical education. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL discourse (pp. 205–227). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Jiménez Catalán, R.M.
(Eds.) (2009) Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V.
(2015) Reading strategies and CLIL: The effect of training in formal instruction. Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 319–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serra, C.
(2007) Assessing CLIL at primary school: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 582–602.Google Scholar
Shulman, L.S.
(1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skenton, A.K.
(2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sylvén, L.K.
(2004) Teaching in English or English teaching? On the effects of content and language integrated learning on Swedish learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Slyvén, L.K.
(2013) CLIL in Sweden – Why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 301–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, M.A., Met, M., & Genesee, F.
(1989) A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D.J., & Cammarata, L.
(2012) Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 28–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, M.
(1999) History and geography through French: CLIL in a UK secondary school. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a foreign language: Models, methods and outcomes, (pp. 96–105). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Allain, L., & Gao, Y.
(2008) Why and how CLIL works: An outline for a CLIL theory. Vienna English Working Papers, 16(3), 70–78.Google Scholar
Várkuti, A.
(2010) Linguistic benefits of the CLIL approach. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 83–92.Google Scholar
Washburn, L.
(1997) English immersion in Sweden: A case study of Röllingby High School, 1987–1989. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A.
(2011) Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research, 15, 343–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H.
(1999) Language learning in European immersion classes. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a foreign language: Models, methods and outcomes (pp. 16–25). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Wolff, D.
(2003) Integrating language and content in the language classroom: Are transfer of knowledge and of language ensured? Accessed at http://​asp​.revues​.org​/1154
Woods, P., Boyle, M., Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G.
(2000) A research team in ethnography. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(1), 85–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woods, C.B., Tannehill, D., Quinlan, A., Moyna, N. & Walsh, J.
(2010) The children’s sport participation and physical activity study (CSPPA). Research Report No 1. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
Yip, D., Tsang, W., & Cheung, S.
(2003) Evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Performance on the science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(2), 295–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Barrios, Elvira & Irene Acosta-Manzano
2020. Primary students’ satisfaction with CLIL and perceived CLIL linguistic difficulty. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cammarata, Laurent & T.J. Ó Ceallaigh
2020.  In Teacher Development for Immersion and Content-Based Instruction [Benjamins Current Topics, 110],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cammarata, Laurent & T. J. Ó Ceallaigh
2018. Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 6:2  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Huertas-Abril, Cristina A. & Aigerim Shashken
2021. Exploring the Potential of CLIL in Kazakhstan: A Qualitative Study. Revista Complutense de Educación 32:2  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
Krüger, Mirko
2018. Einstellungen von Sportlehramtsstudierenden zur Sprachbildung im Sportunterricht. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research 48:3  pp. 415 ff. Crossref logo
Krüger, Mirko
2019. The development and validation of a self-report instrument to assess attitudes and self-efficacy of preservice teachers toward teaching linguistically and culturally diverse PE classes. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 23:1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Seah, Lay Hoon & Rita Elaine Silver
2020. Attending to science language demands in multilingual classrooms: a case study. International Journal of Science Education 42:14  pp. 2453 ff. Crossref logo
Tagnin, Laura & Máire Ní Ríordáin
2021. Building science through questions in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education 8:1 Crossref logo
Turner, Marianne
2021.  In International Perspectives on CLIL,  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.