Teaching CLIL?
Yes, but with a pinch of SALT
CLIL (content and language integrated learning) is an educational approach where a classroom subject is taught through a second language. However, its core features are ambiguously interpreted. Research on CLIL teaching has consistently shown that teachers focus their methodological efforts on the teaching of subject matter concepts and take any language related aspects mostly as by-products of such an approach. This has led to only sparsely planned methodological efforts when it comes to the teaching of language. Contrary to this, it is argued in this hermeneutical study that thinking and language acquisition are inextricably intertwined and CLIL teachers are therefore by definition also language teachers. Following this, the author reports on a pedagogical CLIL model, named SALT, that was devised for and successfully implemented in CLIL training courses to support subject teachers on their way to becoming language-aware CLIL teachers. Pedagogical procedures of the model's principles and concepts are also presented.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Four core language aspects
- 2.1Content and language integration
- 2.2CLIL pedagogical language knowledge
- 2.3Language as a tool for academic communication and thinking
- 2.4The power of all languages in the CLIL classroom
- 3.SALT – a pedagogical and language-aware model for the teaching of CLIL
- 3.1SALT and its four dimensions
- 3.2S – learning content through strategic languaging
- 3.2.1Key concepts and principles for languaging strategies
- 3.2.2Languaging procedures for “learning content through languaging strategies”
- 3.3A – learning content through using all language practices
- 3.3.1Key concepts and principles for encouraging all language practices
- 3.3.2Languaging procedures for learning content through using all language practices
- 3.4L – learning content through multimodal and digital literacies
- 3.4.1Key concepts and principles for multi-modal and digital literacies
- 3.4.2Languaging procedures for learning content through multimodal and digital literacies
- 3.5T – learning content through topic relevant languaging
- 3.5.1Key concepts and principles for topic-relevant languaging
- 3.5.2Procedures for learning content through topic relevant languaging
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C.
(
2010)
A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K–12 English Language Learners. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A.
(
2014)
The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction.
Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118–136.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J.
(
2015)
Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barwell, R.
(
2016)
A Bakhtinian perspective on language and content integration: Encountering the alien word in in second language mathematics. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 101–122). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bateman, J.
(
2014)
Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonnet, A.
(
2012)
Language, content and Interaction: How to make CLIL classrooms work. In
D. Marsh, &
O. Meyer (Eds.),
Quality interfaces: Examining evidence and exploring solutions in CLIL (pp. 175–190). Eichstätt, Germany: Eichstaett Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L.
(
2012)
How the languages we speak shape the ways we think. In
M. Spivey,
K. McRae, &
M. Joanisse (Eds.),
Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 615–632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bovellan, E.
(
2014)
Teachers’ beliefs about learning and language as reflected in their views of teaching materials for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Jyväskylä.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brüning, C. I., & Purrmann, M.-S.
(
2014)
CLIL pedagogy in Europe: CLIL teacher education in Germany.
Utrecht Studies in Language & Communication, 271, 315–338.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J.
(
2012)
Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers.
The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cammarata, L., Tedick, D. J., & Osborn, A. T.
(
2016)
Content-based instruction and curricular reforms: Issues and goals. In
L. Cammarata (Ed.),
Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cenoz, J.
(
2015)
Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8–24.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
(
2014)
Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking dorward.
Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
(
2015)
Towards a holistic approach in the study of multilingual education. In
J. Cenoz &
D. Gorter (Eds.),
Multilingual education: Between language learning and translanguaging (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, A. D.
(
2011)
Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, A. D.
(
2012)
Strategies: The interface of styles, strategies, and motivation on tasks. In
S. Mercer &
S. Ryan (Eds.),
Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 136–150). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, A. D., & Griffiths, C.
(
2015)
Revisiting LLS research 40 years later.
TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 414–429.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, V.
(
2011)
Linguistic relativity and language teaching. In
V. Cook &
B. Bassetti (Eds.),
Language and bilingual cognition (pp. 509–518). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C.
(
2008)
Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corcoll López, C., & González-Davies, M.
(
2015)
Switching codes in the plurilingual classroom.
English Language Teaching Journal, 70(1), 67–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coxhead, A.
(
2000)
A new academic word list.
TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
(
2010)
CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(
2011)
Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 182–204.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(
2016)
Cognitive discourse functions: Specifying an integrative interdisciplinary construct. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T.
(
2014)
You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013).
Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.
(Eds.) (
2011)
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Domingo, M.
(
2016)
Multimodality in virtual learning environments: Exploring traces of the page in designs of screens. In
C. Haythornthwaite,
R. Andrews,
J. Fransman, &
E. M. Meyers (Eds.),
The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 152–170). London: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donato, R.
(
2016)
Sociocultural theory and content-based foreign language instruction: theoretical insights on the challenge of integration. In
L. Cammarata (Ed.),
Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 24–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
(
2015)
The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.
(
2013)
Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcia, O., & Li, W.
(
2013)
Translanguaging. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gee, J. P.
(
2015)
Literacy and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gierlinger, E. M.
(
2007)
Modular CLIL in lower secondary education: some insights from a research project in Austria. In
C. Dalton-Puffer &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Empirical perspectives on classroom discourse (pp. 79–118). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gierlinger, E. M.
(
2015)
‘You can speak German, sir’: On the complexity of teachers’ L1 use in CLIL.
Language and Education, 29(4), 347–368.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X.
(
2011)
Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI.
Instructional Science, 39(1), 27–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gottlieb, M., & Ernst-Slavit, G.
(
2014)
Academic language in diverse classrooms: Definitions and contexts. Thousand oaks: Corwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C.
(
2014)
An introduction to functional grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hammersley, M.
(
2008)
Questioning qualitative inquiry: Critical essays. London: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L.
(
2012)
The grand design. London: Bantam.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockly, N., Dudeney, G., & Pegrum, M.
(
2013)
Digital literacies. New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoey, M., Mahlberg, M., Stubbs, M., & Teubert, W.
(
2007)
Text, discourse and corpora. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U.
(
2013)
The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerr, P.
(
2014)
Translation and own-language activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kramsch, C., & Huffmaster, M.
(
2015)
Multilingual practices in foreign language study. In
J. Cenoz &
D. Gorter (Eds.),
Multilingual education: Between language learning and translanguaging (pp. 114–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, S.
(
1984)
Immersion: Why it works and what it has taught us.
Language and Society, 121, 61–64.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laufer, B., & Nation, I.
(
2012)
Vocabulary. In
S. M. Gass &
A. Mackey (Eds.),
The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 163–176). Oxon: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levine, G. S.
(
2011)
Code choice in the language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leow, R. P.
(
2015)
Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, W.
(
2013)
Who’s teaching whom? Co-learning in multilingual classrooms. In
S. May (Ed.),
The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp. 167–190). London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lier, L. V.
(
2004)
The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightbown, P. M.
(
2014)
Focus on content-based language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N.
(
2013)
Interthinking: Putting talk to work. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Llinares, A.
(
2015)
Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy.
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Llinares, A., & Nikula, T.
(
2016)
Teacher and student evaluative language in CLIL across contexts: Integrating SFL and pragmatic approaches. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 189–210). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loewen, S.
(
2015)
Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. H.
(
2011)
Methodological principles for language teaching. In
M. H. Long &
C. J. Doughty (Eds.),
The handbook of language teaching (pp. 373–394). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzo, F., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(
2016)
Historical literacy in CLIL: Telling the past in a second language. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 55–72). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Love, K.
(
2010)
Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in the secondary curriculum.
Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(4), 338–355.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S.
(
2011)
Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts.
Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 270–288.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyster, R., Quiroga, J., & Ballinger, S.
Macaro, E.
(
2009)
Teacher use of code switching in the second language classroom: Exploring “optimal” use In
M. Turnbull &
J. Dailey-O’Cain (Eds.),
First language use in second and foreign language learning (pp. 35–49). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macaro, E.
(
2013)
Overview: Where should we be going with classroom code switching research? In
R. Barnard &
J. McLellan (Eds.),
Code switching in university English-medium classes (pp. 10–23). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F.
(
2016)
Academic vocabulary in use edition with answers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDougald, J. S.
(
2015)
Teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language.
Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal, 17(1), 25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J.
(
2008)
Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford: Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mercer, N.
(
2008)
Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding.
Human Development, 51(1), 90–100.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Met, M.
(
1998)
Curriculum decision-making in content-based language teaching. In
J. Cenoz &
F. Genesee (Eds.),
Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education (pp. 35–63). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moate, J.
(
2010)
The integrated nature of CLIL.
International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 38–38. Retrieved from
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morton, T., & Jakonen, T.
(
2016)
Integration of language and content through languaging in CLIL; Classroom interaction: A conversation analysis perspective. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 171–188). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nation, P.
(
2008)
Lexical awareness in second language learning. In
J. Cenoz &
N. Hornberger (Eds.),
Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol 6. Knowledge about language (pp. 167–179). Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Lorenzo, F.
(
2016)
More than content and language: The complexity of integration in CLIL and bilingual education. In
T. Nikula,
E. Dafouz,
P. Moore, &
U. Smit (Eds.),
Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 1–28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikula, T., & Moore, P.
(
2016)
Exploring translanguaging in CLIL.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–13. Advance online publication.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nyikos, M., & May, F.
(
2007)
A review of vocabulary learning strategies: Focus on language proficiency and learner voice. In
A. D. Cohen &
E. Macaro (Eds.),
Language learner strategies (pp. 251–273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L.
(
2014)
Second language learning explained? SLA across 10 contemporary theories. In
B. VanPatten &
J. Williams (Eds.),
Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 245–272). New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Otwinowska, A.
(
2015)
Cognate vocabulary in language acquisition and use: Attitudes, awareness, activation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paquot, M.
(
2010)
Academic vocabulary in learner writing: From extraction to analysis. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paran, A.
(
2013)
Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth.
Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 317–342.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Cañado, M. L.
(
2012)
CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philippakos, Z. A., MacArthur, C. A., & Coker, D. L.
(
2015)
Developing strategic writers through genre instruction: Resources for Grades 3–5. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
(
2012)
Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spada, N.
(
2007)
Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In
J. Cummins &
C. Davison (Eds.),
International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271–288). Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tan, M.
(
2011)
Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning.
Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 325–342.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tyler, A.
(
2012)
Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vygotsky, L. S.
(
2004)
The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In
R. W. Rieber &
D. K. Robinson (Eds.),
The essential Vygotsky (pp. 227–334). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, M., Mercer, S., & Ryan, S.
(
2015)
Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wegner, A.
(
2012)
Seeing the bigger picture: What students and teachers think about CLIL.
International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 29–35.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Aguirregoitia Martinez, Amaia, Kepa Bengoetxea Kortazar & Itziar Gonzalez-Dios
Göpferich, Susanne, Ina Alexandra Machura & Janine T. Murphy
2019.
Supporting English Medium Instruction at German Institutions of Higher Education. In
English in the German-Speaking World,
► pp. 114 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Villabona, Nerea & Jasone Cenoz
2022.
The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers.
Language, Culture and Curriculum 35:1
► pp. 36 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.