Edited by Diana Boxer and María Elena Placencia
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2] 2018
► pp. 248–270
Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish
While there is a growing body of research on impoliteness and conflict talk, the role of accusations in interpersonal conflict has been only addressed in passing. In this paper, we focus on accusations in conflict talk amongst interactants who are in a situation demanding the formation of intimate relationships within a relatively short span of time, namely, the television reality show Big Brother. We examine, in particular, accusation sequences arising in multi-party interactions from the Argentinian and Spanish versions of the show. We analyse the ways in which assertions of fault or wrongdoing are construed as accusations through such responses as denials, counter-accusations and challenges, and the ways in which participants explicitly evaluate each other’s behaviour through such sequences. We conclude that accusations are designed primarily to enact moral denunciation or condemnation of another party, and so almost invariably occasion interpersonal disputes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Accusations, blamings and complaints
- 3.Accusations and interpersonal conflict in Spanish-speaking multi-party interactions in Big Brother
- 3.1Accusations and overall sequence organisation
- 3.2Accusation sequences and interpersonal conflict
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00012.hau
References
References
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.