Cover not available
Article published In:
Closeness and conflict: The discourse of domestic discord across English and Spanish-speaking communities
Edited by Diana Boxer and María Elena Placencia
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2] 2018
► pp. 320–343

Managing conflict on WhatsApp

A contrastive study of British and Spanish family disputes

 | Universidad de Alcalá de Henares
This study investigates family conflict talk in a computer-mediated environment from a language-in-interaction focus. It is based on two different data sets of six WhatsApp groups that feature arguing British families, and of six WhatsApp groups that feature arguing Spanish families. It looks at the different linguistic strategies that participants deploy when taking up opposing stances on a given issue. Through a detailed discourse analysis of the conflict-based episodes in English and Spanish, the results not only show a differentiated linguistic process in the way(s) in which the study participants managed conflict, but also suggest that smartphone-mediated interpersonal conflict needs to be understood as an attempt to inhabit legitimate subject positions in and through discourse.
Keywords: computer-mediated communication, conflict talk, family disputes, interpersonal communication WhatsApp
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Interpersonal communication and communication technology
    • 2.2Conflict talk as language-in-interaction
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Description of the data
    • 3.2Framework and procedure
    • 3.3Discussion: A pragma-discursive approach to the analysis of attribution biases
  • 4.Maintaining, escalating, and terminating conflict talk
    • 4.1The Spanish data set: Adopting a competing conflict style
    • 4.2The English dataset: Adopting a conflict avoidance style
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00015.gar
References (51)
References
Antaki, Charles. 1994. Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organisation of Accounts. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova. (Eds.). 2017. Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Jennifer, and Glen Stamp. 2005. “Impression Management in Chat Rooms: A Grounded Theory Model.” Communication Studies 561: 243–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billings, Andrew. 1979. “Conflict Resolution in Distressed and Non-distressed Married Couple.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 471: 368–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono. 2015. “Beyond Conflicts. Origin and Types of Issues Leading to Argumentative Discussions during Family Mealtimes.” Journal of Language and Aggression and Conflict 3(2): 263–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonito, Joshep, and Raymond Sanders. 2002. “Speakers’ Footing in a Collaborative Writing Task: A Resource for Addressing Disagreement While Avoiding Conflict.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 351: 481–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana. 2011. The Lost Art of the Good Schmooze: Building Rapport and Defusing Conflict in Everyday Talk. New York: Praeger Publications.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald. 1988. “Language and Disputing.” Annual Review of Anthropology 171: 221–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, Donald, and Laura Lein. 1977. “‘You Fruithead’: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Children’s Dispute Settlement.” In Child Discourse, edited by Susan Ervin-Tripp and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, 49–65. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burleson, Brant. 2003. “The Experience and Effects of Emotional Support: What the Study of Cultural and Gender Differences Can Tell Us about Close Relationships, Emotion, and Interpersonal Communication.” Personal Relationships 101: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Church, Amelia. 2016. Preference Organisation and Peer Disputes: How Young Children Resolve Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, Andrew. 2005. “What Are Communities of Practice? A Comparative Review of Four Seminal Works.” Journal of Information Science 31(6): 527–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diego Vallejo, Raúl de, and Carlos Guillén Gestoso. 2008. Mediación: Proceso, Tácticas y Técnicas. Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Ann, and Catherine Garvey. 1981. “Children’s Use of Verbal Strategies in Resolving Conflicts.” Discourse Processes 4(2): 149–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Susanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
García-Gómez, Antonio. 2002. “A Cognitive Approach to Topic Management in Verbal Duels on American Talkshows.” Studies in English Language and Linguistics 41: 145–170.Google Scholar
. 2007. Habla Conflictiva como Acción Social. Discurso y Cognición. Oviedo: Septem Ediciones.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Perceptions of Assertiveness among Women: Triggering and Managing Conflict in Reality Television.” Discourse & Communication 6(4): 379–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland. 1991. Contexts of Accommodation. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D. 1990. Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamelink, Cees. 2011. Media and Conflict: Escalating Evil. London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Holt, Jennifer, and Cynthia DeVore. 2005. “Culture, Gender, Organizational Role, and Styles of Conflict Resolution: A Meta-analysis.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29(2): 165–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Matwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2001. “‘Witnessing’: The Use of First-hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio.” Discourse Studies 3(4): 481–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janicki, Karol. 2015. Language and Conflict. Selected Issues. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karney, Benjamin, and Bradbury, Thomas. 2000. “Attributions in Marriage: State or Trait? A Growth Curve Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 781: 295–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. 1997. “Frame Conflicts and Competing Construals in Family Argument.” Journal of Pragmatics 271: 339–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Alicia. 2008. “Interpersonal Conflict and Resolution Strategies: An Examination of Hong Kong Employees.” Team Performance Management: An International Journal 14(3–4): 165–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Duz, Nuria. 2008. “Real Disorder in the Court: An Investigation of Conflict Talk in US Television Courtroom Shows.” Media, Culture and Society 30(1): 81–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2018. “Emotional Self-presentation on WhatsApp: Analysis of the Profile Status.” Russian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 144–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 1985. “How Children Start Arguments.” Language in Society 141: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Sharon. 2009. Qualitative Case Study Research Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Retrieved from: [URL].
Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia. 1972. “Signifying and Marking: Two African-American Speech Acts.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited by John Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 161–179. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen. 2015. “Discovering Language Variation in WhatsApp Text Interactions.” Onomázein: Revista Semestral de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción 31(1): 113–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. In Structures of Social Action, edited by Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and Jenny Mandelbaum. 2005. “A Conversation Analytic Approach to Relationships.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 149–171. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso, and Olga Cruz-Moya. 2015. “WhatsApp, Textese, and Moral Panics: Discourse Features and Habits across Two Generations.” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 1731: 300–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, Catherine, and Kim Karetsky. 2002. “Intimacy Goals and Strategies of Conflict Resolution in Dating Relationships: A Mediational Analysis.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 19(3): 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society 131: 311–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955 [1908]. Conflict and The Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Denise, and Jennifer Theiss. 2013. Interpersonal Communication. Putting Theory into Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, Ainin, and Muzamil Naqshbandi. 2014. Social Media: Dynamism, Issues and Challenges. Singapore: Partridge Publishing.Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy. 1994. English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena. 2015. “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 5 (3): 355–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Confrontation and Collaboration in the Course of the Election Debate.” Language and Dialogue 6 (3): 370–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Cano, Esteban. 2012. “Mobile Learning with Twitter to Improve Linguistic Competence at Secondary Schools.” The New Educational Review 29(3): 134–147.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel. 1990. “The Sequential Organization of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict”. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversations, edited by Allen Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2017. “Contextual Constraints and Non-propositional Effects in WhatsApp Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 66–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2024. Sharing is caring: An ethnographic approach to Spanish WhatsApp groups. Journal of Pragmatics 226 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Kohne, Julian, Jon D. Elhai & Christian Montag
2023. A Practical Guide to WhatsApp Data in Social Science Research. In Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing [Studies in Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavioral Economics, ], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Kohne, Julian & Christian Montag
2023. ChatDashboard: A Framework to collect, link, and process donated WhatsApp Chat Log Data. Behavior Research Methods 56:4 ► pp. 3658 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Philippa
2023. Online counterspeech and the targeting of digital discourses of racism in New Zealand. In Social Media and Society [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 100], ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
García-Gómez, Antonio
2022. Learning through WhatsApp: students’ beliefs, L2 pragmatic development and interpersonal relationships. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:5-6 ► pp. 1310 ff. DOI logo
Cruz-Moya, Olga & Alfonso Sánchez-Moya
2021. Humour in multimodal times. Internet Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía
2020. Managing conflict originated by feminism. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía
2021. Online disagreement in WhatsApp groups: A comparative study of Spanish family members and work colleagues. Discourse & Communication 15:5 ► pp. 542 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.