Cover not available
Article published In:
Morality and language aggression
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Vahid Parvaresh
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1] 2019
► pp. 32–55

Everyday incivility and the urban interaction order

Theorizing moral affordances in ritualized interaction

| University of Guelph, Canada
Treating uncivil encounters as breaches of the ritual contract of civil inattention (Goffman 1963), this article connects ritualized interaction between strangers in everyday life and the production and maintenance of moral order more generally. The ongoing enactment of the ritual of civil inattention maintains and characterizes the particular kind of moral order that strangers collectively produce in urban public spaces.Drawing on select empirical materials – from unsolicited commentary to queue-jumping – gathered under the auspices of the Researching Incivility in Everyday Life (RIEL) Project this article builds upon the ‘everyday incivilities’ approach pioneered by Smith, Phillips and King (2010) to examine moral dimensions of everyday encounters between strangers. Preliminary analysis of the RIEL data indicates that ritual dimensions of interaction between strangers in public space provide interactants with moral affordances, that is, opportunities to align themselves with an idealized moral order through projective moral action.
Keywords: moral order, interaction ritual, strangers, affordances
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What we do and do not know about strangers and uncivil encounters
    • 2.1Strangers and pragmatics: Problems of common ground
    • 2.2Strangers and urban sociology: Idealized sociability
    • 2.3Interaction ritual and the social reproduction of moral order
  • 3.Mutual commitment and moral order
    • 3.1Urban interaction order as moral order
  • 4.Accounting for accounts: From observed behaviours to interpreted experiences
  • 5.Stranger encounters and/as the problem of moral order
    • 5.1Retrospective voicing: Where is the moral order if no bystander intervenes?
  • 6.Outline of a theory of moral affordances: Stranger interaction as moral landscape
    • 6.1Moral order as moral landscape: Aspirational accounts and projective moral action
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00018.hor
References
Alexander, Jeffrey
2006 The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, Bernhard Giesen, and Jason L. Mast
eds. 2006 Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elijah
2011 The Cosmopolitan Canopy: Race and Civility in Everyday Life. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret
1995 Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
2003 “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts).” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1453–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Piia Varis
2015 “The Importance of Unimportant Language.” Multilingual Margins 2(1): 4–9.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert
1954 “What Is Wrong with Social Theory?” American Sociological Review 19(1): 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
2000 Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2007 “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(12): 2185–2216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Sage Graham and Miriam Locher, 101–134. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Jonathan Culpeper
2008 “Impoliteness: Eclecticism and Diaspora.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 161–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chemero, Anthony
2003 “An Outline of a Theory of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 15(2):181–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert
1992 Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall
2005 Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 3232–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Dániel Kádár
eds. 2010 Historical (Im)Politeness. New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dromi, Shai
2012 “Penny for Your Thoughts: Beggars and the Exercise of Morality in Daily Life” Sociological Forum 27(4): 847–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary
2005 Purity and Danger. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duneier, Mitchell, and Harvey Molotch
1999 “Talking City Trouble: Interactional Vandalism, Social Inequality, and the ‘Urban Interaction Problem.’” American Journal of Sociology 104(5): 1263–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile
1964 The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische
1998 “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J.
2006 “Social Consequences of Common Ground.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 399–340. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan
2014 “The Hinge: Civil Society, Group Culture, and the Interaction Order.” Social Psychology Quarterly 77(1): 5–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2013 “Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.“ Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 120–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gibson, James
2011 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
1986 The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1987 Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret
2014 Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
1963 Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
1971 Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
1983a “The Interaction Order” American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving, and Josef Verhoeven
1980 “An Interview with Erving Goffman.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 317–48.Google Scholar
Good, James M. M.
2007 “The Affordances for Social Psychology of the Ecological Approach to Social Knowing.” Theory & Psychology 17(2): 265–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2006 “Human Sociality as Mutual Orientation in a Rich Interactive Environment.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 97–125. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Hanks, William
2006 “Joint Commitment and Common Ground in a Ritual Event.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 299–328. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Bert, and Reuben Baron
1992 “Values as Constraints on Affordances: Perceiving and Acting Properly.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22(3): 263–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Mervyn
2012 “Strangers and Strangership.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 33(6): 607–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Durkheim, Development and the Devil: A Cultural Sociology of Community Conflict.” Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 39(4): 741–63.Google Scholar
2017a “Interaction, Indifference, Injustice: Elements of a Normative Theory of Urban Solidarity.” In Interrogating the Social: A Critical Sociology for the 21st Century, edited by Fuyuki Kurasawa, 61–94. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b “Mundane Mutualities: Solidarity and Strangership in Everyday Urban Life.” In Place, Diversity and Solidarity, edited by Stijn Oosterlynck, Nick Schuermans, and Maarten Loopmans, 19–32. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2008 “Participants’ Orientations to Interruptions, Rudeness and Other Impolite Acts in Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 221–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Michelle O’Reilly
2010 “Children’s Participation and the Familial Moral Order in Family Therapy.” Discourse Studies 12(1): 49–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Risako
1996 “ ‘Friendly but Strangers’: Self-Disclosure and the Creation of Solidarity at Service Encounters in America.” In SALSA IV: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium about Language and Society 371: 143–52.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8(2–3): 223–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Lucy, Catherine Harris, and Gill Valentine
2017 “Rethinking Concepts of the Strange and the Stranger.” Social & Cultural Geography 18(1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy
2018 “Swearing, Moral Order, and Online Communication.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6(1): 107–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayawickreme, Eranda, and Anthony Chemero
2008 “Ecological Moral Realism: An Alternative Theoretical Framework for Studying Moral Psychology.” Review of General Psychology 12(2): 118–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas
2009 “Speech Act Research between Armchair, Field and Laboratory.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(8): 1611–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel
2014 “Heckling: A Mimetic-Interpersonal Perspective.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Marcel Bax
2013 “In-Group Ritual and Relational Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 73–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Siân Robinson Davies
2016 “Ritual, Aggression, and Participatory Ambiguity: A Case Study of Heckling.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4(2): 202–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
2015 “(Im)Politeness and (Im)Morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 239–60.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Danny
2018 The Nation and the Promise of Friendship: Building Solidarity through Sociability. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keane, Webb
2016 Ethical Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin, and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2006 “On the Human ‘Interaction Engine.’” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts
2005 Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lofland, Lyn
1973 A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maines, David
1982 “In Search of Mesostructure: Studies in the Negotiated Order.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 11(3): 267–79.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas, and Don Zimmerman
1984 “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly 47(4): 301–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaels, Claire
2003 “Affordances: Four Points of Debate.” Ecological Psychology 15(2): 135–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim
2017 Face and (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár, 89–118. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Jun, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2017 “(Im)Politeness and Relationality.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár, 257–85. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Tim, and Philip Smith
2003 “Everyday Incivility: Towards a Benchmark.” The Sociological Review 51(1): 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne Warfield
1990 “Emergent Sociality: A Dialectic of Commitment and Order.” Symbolic Interaction 13(1): 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Social Order as Moral Order.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, edited by Steven Hitlin and Stephen Vaisey, 95–121. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, Erik, and Julian Kiverstein
2014 “A Rich Landscape of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 26(4): 325–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1992 “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. C.
2007 “Scaffolds for Social Meaning.” Ecological Psychology 19(2): 137–51.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred
1975 On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Helmut Wagner, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barry
1975 Queuing and Waiting: Studies in the Social Organization of Access and Delay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman
1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33(1): 46–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg
1971 On Individuality and Social Forms. D. Levine, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip, and Ryan D. King
2013 “From Road Rage to Everyday Automotive Incivility: A Routine Activities Approach to Low-Level Deviance.” The Sociological Quarterly 54(3):476–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Philip, Timothy L. Phillips, and Ryan D. King
2010 Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2016 “The Bases of (Im)Politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002 “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 701–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, R.
1970 “Words, Utterances, Activities.” In Understanding Everyday Life, edited by Jack Douglas, 169–187. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W.
1995 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Valentine, Gill
2008 “Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter.” Progress in Human Geography 32(3): 323–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walum, Lauren Richardson
1974 “The Changing Door Ceremony: Notes on the Operation of Sex Roles in Everyday Life.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2 (4): 506–15.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert
1989 Meaning and Moral Order. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. (Online) public denunciation, public incivilities and offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2022. Offence and morality: Pragmatic perspectives. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2020. Urban interaction ritual. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2021. Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn, Saara Liinamaa, Amanda Dakin, Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu
2020. A Shared Everyday Ethic of Public Sociability: Outdoor Public Ice Rinks as Spaces for Encounter. Urban Planning 5:4 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held & Annick Paternoster
2023. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2020. The pragmatics of ritual. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Puyu Ning
2019. Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Andrea Szalai
2020. The socialisation of interactional rituals. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid
2022. On the morality of taking offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
2021. Taking offence at the (un)said:Towards a more radical contextualist approach. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Weenink, Don, Raheel Dhattiwala & David van der Duin
2022. Circles of Peace. A Video Analysis of Situational Group Formation and Collective Third-Party Intervention in Violent Incidents. The British Journal of Criminology 62:1 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.