Cover not available
Article published In:
Morality and language aggression
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Vahid Parvaresh
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1] 2019
► pp. 56–78

“Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question”

The impact of quoting members of the public in Prime Minister’s Questions

| University of York, UK | University of Salford, UK
| University of York, UK

Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) in the UK attracts much criticism for the adversarial and occasional aggressive language on display. During his successful campaign for the leadership of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn called for a “new kind of politics” (ITV 2015). One feature of his “new” approach, apparent during his early sessions as Leader of the Opposition, was to include questions to Prime Minister David Cameron sourced from members of the public. Although, subsequently, these “public questions” became less frequent, they provided an opportunity to compare their interactional effects with standard “non-public questions”. Arguably, the aim of this salient feature of corbyn’s approach to questioning Cameron was to redress the moral order of PMQs. We test this proposal via two measures of the PM’s responses: reply rate and personalisation. Results showed that Corbyn’s public questions did not enhance Cameron’s reply rate. However, whereas Cameron used significantly more personal attacks than Corbyn in response to non-public questions, the level of such attacks by the PM for public questions was as low as Corbyn’s, with no significant difference between them. In this latter regard, such an approach showed the potential to mitigate the ritualistic and customary verbal aggression of PMQs.

Keywords: PMQs, personal attacks, personalisation, quotations, reply rate, equivocation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The social frame of PMQs
    • 1.2Academic research on PMQs
    • 1.3Quotations in PMQs
    • 1.4Measures of analysis
    • 1.5Hypotheses
  • 2.Data and methodology
    • 2.1Reply rate
    • 2.2Personalisation
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Reply rates
    • 3.2Personalisation
    • 3.3Illustrative examples
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00019.bul
References
Allen, Beccy, Ruth Fox, Isla Geis-King, Virginia Gibbons, Matt Korris, Petya Pavlova, and Michael Raftery
2014 Tuned in or Turned Off? Public Attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
Bates, Stephen R., Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Liam Stanley
2014 “Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron.” Parliamentary Affairs 67(2):253–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bercow, John
2010 [Online]. Speech to the Centre for Parliamentary Studies. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Blair, Tony
2010 A Journey. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, edited by Esther N. Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter
1994 “On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-replies in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(2):115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Ambiguity. London: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “ ‘Slipperiness, Evasion, and Ambiguity’: Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27(4):333–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Techniques of Political Interview Analysis.” In Discourse and Politics, edited by Gloria Álvarez-Benito, Gabriela Fernández-Díaz, and Isabel Íñigo-Mora, 215–228. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2016 [Online]. “Theresa May Has a Very Special Technique for Avoiding Questions.” The Conversation. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
2017 [Online]. “Who Dodges More Questions, Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn? The Verdict is In.” The Conversation. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Bull, Peter, Judy Elliott, Derrol Palmer, and Libby Walker
1996 “Why Politicians are Three-faced: The Face Model of Political Interviews.” British Journal of Social Psychology 35(2):267–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer
1993 “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews.” Political Psychology 14(4):651–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Pam Wells
2012 “Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(1):30–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob
1960 “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1):37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbyn, Jeremy
2016 [Online]. “Today is my 100th PMQs Question as Labour Leader – But I Still Won’t Get a Straight Answer from David Cameron.” The Independent. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3):349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domenici, Kathy, and Stephen W. Littlejohn
2006 Facework: Bridging Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, G. W. Jones, Jane Burnham, Robert Elgie, and Peter Fysh
1993 “Leaders, Politics and Institutional Change: The Decline of Prime Ministerial Accountability to the House of Commons, 1868–1990.” British Journal of Political Science 23(3):267–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, G. W. Jones, and Brendan O’Leary
1990 “Prime Ministers and the Commons: Patterns of Behaviour, 1868 to 1987.” Public Administration 68(1):123–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
in preparation). “Quoting Ordinary People in Prime Minister’s Questions.” To be submitted to Constructing Ordinariness across Media Genres: Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series edited by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer Amsterdam John Benjamins
Giddings, Philip, and Helen Irwin
2005 “Objects and Questions.” In The Future of Parliament, edited by Philip Giddings, 67–77. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gimson, Andrew
2012 “PMQs: That’s the Way to Do It!” British Journalism Review 23(3):11–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 “Where the Action Is.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior by Erving Goffman, 149–270. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1991 “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” In Broadcast Talk edited by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12(4):451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heffer, Greg
2016 [Online]. “Corbyn Claims Cameron is Jealous of His Style as ‘Do Up Your Tie’ Row Rumbles On.” Sunday Express. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 30 December 2018].
House of Commons Information Office
2010a [Online]. Parliamentary Questions (Factsheet P1, Procedure Series). Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 08 May 2018].
2010b [Online]. Some Traditions and Customs of the House (Factsheet G7, General Series). Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 09 May 2018].
Hughes, Laura
2016 [Online]. “One Year into Jeremy Corbyn’s Leadership, Labour Suffers Worst Opinion Poll Ratings the Party Has Ever Experienced in Opposition.” The Telegraph. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Irwin, Helen
1988 “Opportunities for Backbenchers.” In The Commons under Scrutiny edited by Michael Ryle and Peter G. Richards, 76–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irwin, Helen, Andrew Kennon, David Natzler, and Robert Rogers
1993 “Evolving Rules.” In Parliamentary Questions edited by Mark N. Franklin and Philip Norton, 23–72. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
ITV
2015 [Online]. “Jeremy Corbyn Promises ‘New Kind of Politics’ as he Unveils 10-point Policy Plan.” ITV report. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Jucker, Andreas H.
1986 News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lees, Charles
2015 [Online]. “The Saint in the Bear Pit: Reviewing Jeremy Corbyn’s First PMQs.” The Conversation. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Martin, Iain
2013 [Online]. “After a Dire PMQs, MPs Should Get a Pay Cut.” Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 07 May 2018].
Pearce, W. Barnett, and Stephen W. Littlejohn
1997 Moral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Pérez de Ayala, Soledad
2001 “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs? Politeness in Question Time.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(2):143–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rasiah, Parameswary
2010 “A Framework for the Systematic Analysis of Evasion in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(3):664–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sripada, Chandra S., and Stephen Stich
2006 “A Framework for the Psychology of Norms.” In The Innate Mind: Volume 2, Culture and Cognition, edited by Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich, 285–310. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Graham P.
2006 “United Kingdom: The Prime Minister and Parliament.” In Executive Leadership and Legislative Assemblies edited by Nicholas D. J. Baldwin, 4–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tracy, K.
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2):169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waddle, Maurice, and Peter Bull
2016 “Playing the Man, Not the Ball: Personalisation in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35(4):412–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waddle, Maurice, Peter Bull, and Jan R. Böhnke
2019 “‘He is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics’: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38(1):61–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wintour, Patrick
2015 [Online]. “Jeremy Corbyn: It’s Time for a New Kind of Politics.” The Guardian. Available at: [URL]. [Accessed 22 October 2018].
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Bull, Peter
2020. Meeting the media as a political psychologist. History & Philosophy of Psychology 21:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter & Maurice Waddle
2022. Under the Microscope:. In Psychology of Democracy, ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Convery, Alan, Pavielle Haines, James Mitchell & David C. W. Parker
2021. Questioning scrutiny: the effect of Prime Minister’s Questions on citizen efficacy and trust in parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 27:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Vittorio Tantucci
2021. The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics 175 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2023. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 204 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2020. The pragmatics of ritual. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Puyu Ning
2019. Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2020. Visuo-material performances. AILA Review 33 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Sylvia
2020. Women, Language and Politics, DOI logo
Shephard, Mark & Daniel Braby
2020. Questions to the PM versus questions by the PM: an examination of the state and nature of ‘Punch and Judy’ politics during PMQs at Westminster. The Journal of Legislative Studies 26:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Of the People. In Psychology of Democracy, ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.