Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and ConflictVol. 7:2 (2019) ► pp.269–292
Attending to a possible complaint
Preference for noticings, anticipatory apologies and preemptive accounts to forestall potential conflict
Taking into account that people are reluctant to engage in a conflictual interaction but also that the recognition and interpretation of a complaint is very much contingent on the discourse in which it appears, the present paper adopts a conversation analytic perspective and studies complaints in ordinary conversation. In terms of politeness research, complaints are characterized as ‘face threatening acts’, with the analysis focusing either on the mitigation strategies the complainer may employ or on the description of the acts that are at the complainee’s disposal. From a wider perspective, the most prominent feature of complaints is that they transform an individual’s trouble into an acknowledgeable interpersonal problem. The present research focuses on complaints addressed to participants in the on-going interaction (direct complaints), explicating instances where members themselves reveal their understanding of the complaint. Special attention is given to the mitigation and accounting practices a complainee employs, i.e. noticings, anticipatory apologies and (preemptive) accounts, which all aim to withhold the disaffiliative complaint. Through these practices, not only does the candidate complaint-recipient mitigate the impact of his/her accountability but also third party participants attempt to avoid the delivery of the complaint. The data of the study consist of 20 audio-recorded conversations between friends and relatives and are drawn from the Corpus of Spoken Greek of the Institute of Modern Greek Studies.
Keywords: complaints, noticings, apologies, accounts, conversation analysis, accountability, Corpus of Spoken Greek
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background research on complaints
- 3.The present study: Methodology and data
- 4.Analysis and discussion
- 4.1Complainee accepts no blame for the complaint
- 4.2Complainee admits from the outset the blame for the complaint
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Transcription symbols
-
References
References
Alberts, Jess
1988 “An Analysis of Couples’ Conversational Complaint Interactions.” Communication Monographs 5(2):184–9. 
Atkinson, Maxwell, and Paul Drew
1971 Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Karafoti, Eleni
2015a “Absent Second Pair Parts and their Relevance for (Im)politeness.” In Exploring (Im)politeness in Specialized and General Corpora: Converging Methodologies and Analytic Procedures, ed. by Şukriye, Ruhi, and Yeşim, Aksan, 82–105. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2015b “Politeness, Impoliteness and Speaker’s Face.” Ph.D. Thesis. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Boxer, Diana
1993 “Social Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics 191:103–125.
1995 Complaining and Commiserating: A Speech Act View of Solidarity in Spoken American English. New York: Peter Lang.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christodoulidou, Maria
2010 “Complaints about Misbehaviour.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 101:295–316.
2012 “Conversational Irony: Evaluating Complaints.” In Spaces of Polyphony, ed. by Clara Ubaldina Lorda, and Patrick Zabalbeascoa, 25–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cohen, Andrew, and Elite Olshtain
1993 “The Production of Speech Acts by EFL Learners.” TESOL Quarterly 27(1):33–56.
Curl, Traci, Paul Drew, and Richard Ogden
2002 “Complaining: Affiliation and Disaffiliation in Complaint Sequences in Conversation.” University of York, unpublished manuscript.
Dersley, Ian, and Antony Wootton
2000 “Complaint Sequences within Antagonistic Argument.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4):375–406.
Drew, Paul
1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3):295–325.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth, Holt
1988 “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35(4): 398–417.
Drew, Paul, and Traci, Walker
2009 “Going too far: Complaining, Escalating, and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12):2400–2414.
Edwards, Derek
2005 “Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints.” Discourse Studies 7(1): 5–29.
Emerson, Robert M., and Sheldon L. Messinger
1977 “The Micro-Politics of Trouble.” Social Problems 251:121–34.
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities”. Social Problems 11(3):225–50.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2001 “Arguing about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations”. Journal of Pragmatics 33(12):1881–1900.
Geluykens, Ronald, and Bettina Kraft
2003 “Sociocultural Variation in Native and Interlanguage Complaints.” In Meaning Through Language Contrast, ed. by Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt, and Ken Turner, 251–275, vol. 21, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2007 “Gender Variation in Native and Interlanguage Complaints.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics and Interlanguage English, ed. by Bettina Kraft, and Ronald Geluykens, 143–158. Muenchen: Lincom-Europa.
Gruber, Helmut
1998 “Disagreeing: Sequential Placement and Internal Structure of Disagreements in Conflict Episodes.” Text 181:467–503.
Hartford, Beverly, and Ahmar Mahboob
2004 “Models of Discourse in the Letter of Complaint.” World Englishes 23(4):585–600.
Haugh, Michael
2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 421:2106–2119.
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel, Kádár
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine
2009a “Complaining in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12):2381–2384.
2009b “Participation and Exclusion in Third Party Complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2435–2451.
Heritage, John
1984a Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
1984b “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1988 “Explanations as Accounts: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” In Analyzing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, ed. by Charles Antaki, 127–144. London: Sage.
1990 “Interactional Accountability: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Réseaux 8(1):23–49.
1997 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Data.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. by David Silverman, 161–182. London: Sage.
Holt, Elizabeth
2011 “On the Nature of ‘Laughables’: Laughter as a Response to Overdone Figurative Phrases.” Pragmatics 21(3):393–410.
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35(4):418–442.
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kakavá, Christina
2002 “Opposition in Modern Greek Discourse: Cultural and Contextual Constraints.” Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11):1537–1568.
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 221:193–216.
Koshik, Irene
2005 Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Laforest, Marty
2002 “Scenes of Family Life: Complaining in Everyday Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11):1595–1620.
2009 “Complaining in Front of a Witness: Aspects of Blaming Others for their Behaviour in Multi-party Family Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 411:2452–2464.
Makri-Tsilipakou, Marianthi
1991 “Agreement/Disagreement: Affiliative vs. Disaffiliative Display in Cross-Sex Conversation.” Ph.D. Thesis. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Mandelbaum, Jenny
1993 “Assigning Responsibility in Conversational Storytelling: The Interactional Construction of Reality.” Text 131:247–266.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2005 “Complaint Calls to a Caregiver Service Company: The Case of Desahogo
.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2(4):481–514.
Maynard, Douglas
1989 “Perspective-display Sequences in Conversation.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 531:91–113.
McLaughlin, Margaret, Michael Cody, and Dan H. O’Hair
1983 “The Management of Failure Events: Some Contextual Determinants of Accounting Behavior.” Human Communication Research 91:208–224.
Monzoni, Chiara M.
2009 “Direct Complaints in (Italian) Calls to the Ambulance: The Use of Negatively Framed Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2465–2478.
Murphy, Beth, and Joyce Neu
1996 “My Grade’s too Low: The Speech Act Set of Complaining.” In Speech Acts Across Cultures, ed. by Susan M. Gass, and Joyce Neu, 191–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Olshtain, Elite, and Liora Weinbach
1993 “Interlanguage Features of the Speech Act of Complaining.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 108–122. New York: Oxford University Press.
Orthaber, Sara
2017 “(Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre.” Ph.D. Thesis. University of Surrey.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula, Charikleia, Kapellidi, and Eleni, Karafoti
2014 “The Corpus of Spoken Greek.” In Best Practices for Spoken Corpora in Linguistic Research, ed. by Thomas Schmidt, Kai Wörner, Şükriye Ruhi, and Michael Haugh, 56–74. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2004 “Prompting Action: The Stand-alone ‘So’ in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 371:185–218.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
(ed.) 2016 Accountability in Social Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sacks, Harvey
1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John A. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
1992/5 Lectures on Conversation, vol. 11. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8(4):289–327.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50(4):696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1982 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘uh huh ’ and Other Things that Come Between Sentences.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71–93, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
1988 “On an Actual Virtual Servo-Mechanism for Guessing Bad News: A Single Case Conjecture.” Social Problems 35(4):442–45.
1997 “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 231:499–545.
2005 “On Complainability.” Social Problems 52(4):449–476.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail, Jefferson, and Harvey, Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 531: 361–382.
Searle, John R.
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5(1):1–23.
Traverso, Veronique
2009 “The Dilemmas of Third-party Complaints in Conversation between Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12):2385–2399.
Trosborg, Anna
1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trosborg, Anna, and Philip, Saw
1998 “ ‘Sorry Does not Pay my Bills.’ The Handling of Complaints in Everyday Inter-action/Cross-Cultural Business Interaction.” Hermes, Journal of Linguistics 211:67–94.