Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 8:1 (2020) ► pp.118–145

Angry tweets

A corpus-assisted study of anger in populist political discourse

ORCID logo | Universidad de Navarra, Spain
The rise of populism has turned researchers’ attention to the importance of affect in politics. This is a corpus-assisted study investigating lexis in the semantic domain of anger and violence in tweets by radical-right campaigner Nigel Farage in comparison with four other prominent British politicians. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses of discourse show that Farage cultivates a particular set of affective-discursive practices, which bring anger into the public sphere and offer a channel to redirect frustrations. Rather than expressing his own emotions, he presents anger as generalised throughout society, and then performs the role of defending ‘ordinary people’ who are the victims of the elites. This enables him to legitimise violent emotions and actions by appealing to the need for self-assertion and self-defence.
Keywords: populism, political discourse, emotion, anger, social media
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Affective-discursive practices and emotional regimes
    • 2.1Affect and emotion in discourse
    • 2.2Anger in politics
    • 2.3The social media environment
  • 3.Materials and methods
    • 3.1Methodological approach
    • 3.2Corpus description
    • 3.3Quantitative analysis
    • 3.4Qualitative analysis
  • 4.Quantitative analysis
    • 4.1Overview of emotion-related lexis
    • 4.2Positive emotion-related lexis
    • 4.3Negative emotion-related lexis
    • 4.4Locus of anger/violence
  • 5.Qualitative analysis
    • 5.1Attacks and attackers
    • 5.2Violence/violent
    • 5.3Anger/angry
    • 5.4Bullies and bullying
    • 5.5Anger/violence and agency
    • 5.6Comparison with other negative emotions: Fear and worry
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Software
Published online: 25 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00033.bre
References (46)
References
Bale, Tim. 2018. “Who Leads and who Follows? The Symbiotic Relationship between UKIP and the Conservatives – and Populism and Euroscepticism.” Politics 38 (3): 263–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2009. “Dimensions of Evaluation: Cognitive and Linguistic Perspectives.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17(1): 146–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ben Moussa, Mohamed. 2013. “From Arab Street to Social Movements: Re-theorizing Collective Action and the Role of Social Media in the Arab Spring.” Westminster Papers 9(2): 45–68.Google Scholar
Berrocal, Martina. 2017. “‘Victim Playing’ as a Form of Verbal Aggression in the Czech Parliament.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 81–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2017. “Tired of Nice People? An Appraisal-based Approach to Trump’s Dichotomies.” Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación 181: 7–25.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Emotion in Politics: Affective-discursive Practices in UKIP and Labour.” Discourse & Society 30(1): 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brindle, Andrew, and Corrie Macmillan. 2017. “Like & Share if you Agree. A Study of Discourses and Cyber Activism of the Far-right British Nationalist Party Britain First.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 108–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clough, Patricia. 2012. “War by Other Means: What Difference do(es) the Graphic(s) Make?” In Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion, ed. by Athina Karatzogianni, and Adi Kuntsman, 21–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deakin, Michael. 2019. “Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party is Tearing itself apart.” Daily Telegraph, 6 December.Google Scholar
Eatwell, Roger, and Matthew Goodwin. 2018. National Populism. The Revolt against Liberal Democracy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ekström, Mats, Patrona, Marianna, and Thornborrow, Joanna. 2018. “Right-wing Populism and the Dynamics of Style: A Discourse-analytic Perspective on Mediated Political Performances. Palgrave Communications 4 (83). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Nicole, Sven Engesser, Florin Büchel, Sina Blassnig, and Frank Esser. 2017. “Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter across Six Countries.” Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1347–1364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gammerl, Benno. 2012. “Emotional Styles – Concepts and Challenges.” Rethinking History 16(2): 161–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillioz, Christelle, Johnny Fontaine, Cristina Soriano, and Klaus R. Scherer. 2016. “Mapping Emotion Terms into Affective Space.” Swiss Journal of Psychology 75(3): 141–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Matthew, and Caitlin Milazzo. 2015. UKIP: Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito. 2018. “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-based Hostility.” Łodz Papers in Pragmatics 14(1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krapp, Claudia. 2019. “Das ‘Phänomen Johnson’.” Forschung und Lehre, 1 August 2019.Google Scholar
Leezenberg, Michiel. 2017. “Discursive Violence and Responsibility: Notes on the Pragmatics of Dutch Populism.” In Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, ed. by Monika Kopytowska, 243–270. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsh, David, Paul ’t Hart, and Karen Tindall. 2010. “Celebrity Politics: The Politics of the Late Modernity?” Political Studies Review 3(1): 17–33.Google Scholar
Martell, Luke. 2018. “Corbyn, Populism and Power.” Hard Times 1011: 1–11.Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 1981. Longman Lexicon of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mishra, Pankaj. 2017. Age of Anger. A History of the Present. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Europe’s Populist Surge.” Foreign Affairs 95(6): 25–30.Google Scholar
Nadeem, Nahla. 2019. “Politicizing Collective Identities: Online News Commentaries in the Arab Spring.” In Populist Discourse across Modes and Media, ed. by Ruth Breeze, and Ana M. Fernández Vallejo, 239–256. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ng, Kwai Hang, and Jeffrey L. Kidder. 2010. “Toward a Theory of Emotive Performance: With Lessons from how Politicians Do Anger.” Sociological Theory 28(2): 193–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2016. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L. 2017. “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(1): 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, and Anna Marchi. 2015. “Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis.” In Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, 216–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2008. “From Key words to Key Semantic Domains.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment.” Computing Department, Lancaster University. [URL]
Reddy, William M. 2001. The Navigation of Feeling. A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rone, Julia. 2012. “The Seducer’s Net: Internet, Politics and Seduction.” In Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion, ed. by Athina Karatzogianni, and Adi Kuntsman, 214–229. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. 2005. “What are Emotions? And How Can They Be Measured?” Social Science Information 44(4): 695–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media-sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior.” Journal of Management Information Systems 29(4): 217–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper, and Frank Esser. 2014. “Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework.” In Mediatization of Politics. Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, ed. by Frank Esser, and Jesper Strömbäck, 3–27. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Maarten. 2019. “Measuring People-centrism in Populist Political Discourse: A Linguistic Approach.” In Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist Discourses across the Political Spectrum, ed. by Jan Zienkowski, and Ruth Breeze, 315–340. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Markus. 2014. “Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis.” Political Behavior 361: 683–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2019. Emotions, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Jake, and Tim Bale. 2019. “Populism as an Intra-party Phenomenon: The British Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21(1): 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Iain S., Hywel Williams, Iulia Cioroianu, Matthew Williams, Travis Coan, and Susan Banducci. 2018. “Dynamic Social Media Affiliations among UK Politicians.” Social Networks 541: 132–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret, Tim McCreanor, Alex McConville, Helen Moewaka Barnes, and Jade le Grice. 2015. “Settling Space and Covering the Nation: Some Conceptual Considerations in Analysing Affect and Discourse.” Emotion, Space and Society 161: 56–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Mark. 2011. Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Political Discourses Mean. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Software
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Akkaraca Kose, Melike & Ruth Breeze
2024. Displays of anger in Turkish political discourse: a hard choice between cultural norms and political performance of anger. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2024. Emotion in Populism. In Encyclopedia of New Populism and Responses in the 21st Century, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni, Kate Macfarlane & Mamoun Alazab
2024. A cyberterrorist behind the keyboard. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Galochkin, A. E.
2024. The syntactic position of the “people” in the political discourse of left and right populism (NLP-based syntactic analysis experience). Linguistics & Polyglot Studies 10:2 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Guardamagna, Caterina, Jessica Hampton, Mariana Roccia & Djordje Sredanovic
2024. Microaggressions and impoliteness at the crossroads. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth & Sarali Gintsburg
2023. Exploiting the crisis. In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102], ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
2023. In Quest for Discursive Legitimation of Ongoing Policy Processes: Constructing Brexit as a Success Story. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 61:3 ► pp. 815 ff. DOI logo
Kosman, Marcin
2023. New Polish Right – politeness and radicalism. A corpus analysis of Krzysztof Bosak’s (de)legitimation strategies on twitter. New Perspectives 31:3 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
2023. Representation of gender violence in appeal proceedings in Spain. Revista de Llengua i Dret :79 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Napolitano, Antonella
2023. “A Pandemic within the Pandemic”: A CDA of Social Media Comments on Domestic Violence during COVID-19. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 10:2 DOI logo
Esposito, Eleonora & Ruth Breeze
2022. Gender and politics in a digitalised world: Investigating online hostility against UK female MPs. Discourse & Society 33:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Mitkovska, Liljana & Fevzudina Saračević
2022. Chapter 14. Expressing stance towards COVID-19 conspiracy theories in Macedonian online forum discussions. In Conspiracy Theory Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 98], ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Upadhyaya, Apoorva & Joydeep Chandra
2022. Spotting Flares: The Vital Signs of the Viral Spread of Tweets Made During Communal Incidents. ACM Transactions on the Web 16:4 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers & Elly A. Konijn
2021. When Figurative Frames Decrease Political Persuasion: The Case of Right-Wing Anti-Immigration Rhetoric. Discourse Processes 58:3 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Lipiński, Artur
2020. Populizm a medialne struktury możliwości. Przypadek nowych mediów. Władza Sądzenia :19 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Voices of Supporters [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 101], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.