The pen is mightier than the sword
Malala Yousafzai’s reaction to verbal and nonverbal aggression in her 2013 UN-speech
On October 9, 2012 Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani schoolgirl, was severely wounded by a Taliban assassin’s bullet.
This was the culmination of a history of conflict in the Swat valley region of north-western Pakistan. The historical, ethnic,
political and religious reasons for this conflict are manifold. After several surgeries in Pakistan and Great Britain, Malala
Yousafzai miraculously recovered from her serious injuries and was even able to give a speech at the United Nations Youth Assembly
on her 16th birthday on July 12,
2013.In this paper, Malala Yousafzai’s speech will be analysed in some detail regarding her main arguments and verbal
presentation strategies. Furthermore, I will focus on the way Malala Yousafzai deals with both the verbal and non-verbal
aggression of the Taliban. I would also like to show how determined she is to argue against the Taliban’s escalation of the
conflict without letting herself getting entangled in a spiral of verbal violence.The theoretical framework for this analysis and the critical evaluation of the speech will be the concept of
“strategic maneuvering” as developed by van Eemeren (
2010,
2018) within his framework of Pragma-Dialectics. This concept has frequently been applied to the analysis
of political discourse (see e.g.
Kienpointner 2013,
2017).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Historical background – Overview of the life of Malala Yousafzai
- 3.Theoretical background
- 4.The speech of Malala Yousafzai
- 5.On the evaluation of the speech delivered by Malala Yousafzai
- 6.Conclusion
-
Source texts
-
References
References
Source texts
1. Malala Yousafzai: Speech at the
United Nations Youth Assembly
(
12.
72013) [
[URL]; last seen on January 8, 2020; my own text is based on the transcription of the British newspaper
The Guardian, which has been modified and corrected according to the video (
[URL]; length of the video (within the ABC News Special Report): 19:35; length of Malala Yousafzai’s speech: 00:40 – 17:36, that is, 17 minutes; last seen on January 8, 2020)]
2.
Yousafzai, Malala and
Lamb, Christina (
2013):
Ich bin Malala. München: Droemer (Engl. Original: M. Yousafzai and Chr. Lamb (2013):
I am Malala. New York: Little, Brown and Company).

3.
Yousafzai, Malala and
McCormick, Patricia (
2014):
I am Malala. Teen Edition Retold by Malala for Her Own Generation. London: Indigo.

4.
Yousafzai, Malala (
2017):
Malala’s Magic Pencil. London: Puffin Books, Penguin/Random House.

Aristotle
2006 On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Das, Runa
2017 “
He Named Me Malala: Connecting the Historical, the Local, and the Global.”
Social Identities. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture. 23(2): 195–211.


Eemeren, Frans H. van
2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer.


Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels
2009 Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. Amsterdam: Benjamins.


Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.


Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
1992 Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “
Strategic Manoeuvring with the Burden of Proof.” In
Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited by
Frans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam: SicSat.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser
2006 “
Strategic Manoeuvring with the Burden of Proof.”
Argumentation 20(4): 381–392.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007 Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.


Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

Garssen, Bart
1997 Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Amsterdam: IFOTT.

Gilligan, Carol
1985 Die andere Stimme. München: Piper.

Habermas, Jürgen
1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. 11. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
Kienpointner, Manfred
1986 “
Topische Sequenzen in argumentativen Dialogen.”
Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 14(3): 321–355.


Kienpointner, Manfred
1992 Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann/Holzboog.

Kienpointner, Manfred, and Anna Orlandini
2005 “
La doxa de la justice à travers les langues et les époques.”
Revue Internationale des droits de l’antiquité 521: 181–206.

Kienpointner, Manfred, and Maria Stopfner
2017 “
Ideologies and (Im)politeness.” In
The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by
Culpeper, Jonathan,
Michael Haugh, and
Dániel Z. Kádár, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.


Kohlberg, Lawrence
1974 Zur kognitiven Entwicklung des Kindes. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Khoja-Moolji, Shenila
2018 “
Why is Malala such a Polarising Figure in Pakistan.”
April 1 2018
[URL]
Lakoff, George
2006 Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Larivée, Serge, Carole Sénéchal and Geneviève Chénard
2013 “
Les côtés ténébreux de Mère Teresa.”
Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 42(3): 319–345.


Mazza, Viviana
2013 Die Geschichte von Malala. München: dtv.

Montefiore, Simon Sebag
2015 Speeches that Changed the World. London: Quercus.

Olesen, Thomas
2016 “
Malala and the Politics of Global Iconicity.”
The British Journal of Sociology 67(2): 307–327.


Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1983 Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

Piaget, Jean, and Bärbel Inhelder
1980 Die Psychologie des Kindes. Stuttgart: Klett.

Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.