Article published in:
Discourses of aggression in Greek digitally-mediated communication
Edited by Ourania Hatzidaki and Ioannis E. Saridakis
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2] 2020
► pp. 288–320

Dear friends, traitors and filthy dogs

Vocatives and impoliteness in online discussions of the Greek crisis

| King’s College London, UK
A growing line of research focuses on users’ discussions on social networking sites regarding the causes and consequences of the Greek crisis, as well as on online impoliteness in polarised political debates. Following this trend, I set out to examine how vocatives meant to address non-present interactants (such as politicians or collectivised others) are employed by Greek Facebook and YouTube users to delegitimate their perceived political opponents and attribute blame for the country’s problematic politico-economic situation. I am focusing both on standardly impolite vocatives (personalised negative vocatives) and on superficially polite vocatives (vocatives of mock-endearment and mock-deference), examining their structure and purpose in comments discussing the critical period of the 2015 Greek referendum and subsequent elections. Findings suggest that users exploit norms of standardised politeness and cultural expectations within the Greek interactional context to denigrate their political opponents. Additionally, capitalising on salient discourses on the Greek crisis and on the Greek historical past, on the political content of their discussions, and on the affordances of social media, they take advantage of taboo themes typically associated with impoliteness to name the culprits behind the troublesome everyday Greek reality.
Keywords: personalised negative vocatives, mock-endearment, mock-deference, Greek crisis, online political debates, impoliteness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Vocatives as an impoliteness strategy
    • 2.1Mock-polite vocatives and impoliteness
    • 2.2Personalised negative vocatives and impoliteness
    • 2.3Addressees of vocatives
  • 3.Data and method of analysis
    • 3.1Data collection and selection criteria
    • 3.2Procedure of analysis
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Distribution of mock-polite and personalised negative vocatives in the data
    • 4.2Public impoliteness through mock-endearment and mock-deference
    • 4.3Public impoliteness through personalised negative vocatives
      • 4.3.1Personalised negative vocatives targeting public actors
      • 4.3.2Public impoliteness against collectivised others
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00042.vas
References
Afifi, Walid A., and Judee K. Burgoon
2000 “The Impact of Violations on Uncertainty and the Consequences for Attractiveness.” Human Communication Research 26 (2): 203–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agyekum, Kofi
2010 Akan Verbal Taboos in the Context of Ethnography of Communication. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
2006 Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
2010 “‘you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’ From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in two Online Fora.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 57–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak
2014 “‘They Became Big in the Shadow of the Crisis’: The Greek Success Story and the Rise of the Far Right.” Discourse and Society 25 (4): 540–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apostolidou, Anna
2010 “Inscribing Gendered and National Anxieties on Insulting Language: Linguistic Depictions of Greek Male Homosexuality.” In Language and Sexuality (through and) beyond Gender, ed. by Costas Canakis, Venetia Kantsa, and Kostas Yannopoulos, 43–66. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills, and Nino Rukhadze
2002 “Ethnocentrism, Politeness and Naming Strategies.” Working Papers on the Web https://​extra​.shu​.ac​.uk​/wpw​/politeness​/bargiela​.htm
Boukala, Salomi
2014 “Waiting for Democracy: Political Crisis and the Discursive (Re)invention of the ‘National Enemy’ in Times of ‘Grecovery’.” Discourse and Society 25 (4): 483–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boukala, Salomi, and Dimitra Dimitrakopoulou
2017 “The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek Election and Referendum Campaigns.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (1): 39–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1988 Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Moira, Lada Adamic, and Karyn Marciniak
2013 “Families on Facebook.” In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Massachusetts, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://​research​.fb​.com​/wp​-content​/uploads​/2016​/11​/families​-on​-facebook​.pdf
Chambers, Simone
2001 “Constitutional Referendums and Democratic Deliberation.” In Referendum Democracy, ed. by Matthew Mendelsohn, and Andrew Parkinpp, 231–255. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chamizo, Pedro, and Magdalena Zawislawska
2006 “Animal Names Used as Insults and Derogation in Polish and Spanish.” Philologia hispalensis 20 (2): 137–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, and Stephen A. Rains
2014 “Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments.” Journal of Communication, 64 (4): 658–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Constantinou, Maria
2018 “Resisting Europe, Setting Greece Free: Facebook Political Discussions over the Greek Referendum of the 5th July 2015.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (2): 273–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darma, Rezky Surya, Wennyta Wennyta, and Nurul Fitri
2017 “Swearing Words in ‘Celebrity Read Mean Tweets’ in Jimmy Kimmel Late Night Show: A Sociolinguistic Study.” JELT: Journal of English Language Teaching 1 (1): 76–89.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, Sandi Michele
2013 “Address in Computer-mediated Communication.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics of Computer-Meidated Communication, ed by Susan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen 91: 291–314. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Demjén, Zsófia, and Claire Hardaker
2016 “Metaphor, Impoliteness, and Offence in Online Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, ed. by Elena Semino, and Zofia Demjén, 353–369. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
D’Orazio, Vito, and Idean Salehyan
2018 “Who is a Terrorist? Ethnicity, Group Affiliation, and Understandings of Political Violence.” International Interactions 44 (6): 1017–1039. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunkling, Leslie
1990 A Dictionary of Epithets and Terms of Address. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014 “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estaji, Azam, and Fakhteh Nakhavali
2011 “Contrastive Analysis of “Dog” Expressions in English and Persian.” US-China Foreign Language 9 (4): 213–219.Google Scholar
Felecan, Daiana, and Oliviu Felecan
2016 “Nicknames of Romanian Politicians after 1989.” Philologica Jassyensia 12 (2): 191–207.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. New York: ICL Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2015 “Sharing as Rescripting: Place Manipulations on YouTube between Narrative and Social Media Affordances.” Discourse, Context and Media 91: 64–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Maria Vasilaki
2018 “The Personal and/as the Political: Small Stories and Impoliteness in Online Discussions of the Greek Crisis.” Internet Pragmatics 1 (2): 215–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grząśko, Agnieszka
2015 “On the Semantic History of Selected Terms of Endearment.” Linguistics Beyond and Within 1 (1): 104–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, Nick, Steve Loughnan, and Pamela Sun
2011 “Beastly: What Makes Animal Metaphors Offensive?” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30 (3): 311–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatzidaki, Ourania
2017 “The ‘Theory of the Two Extremes’: A Rhetorical Topography for Self- and Other-Identification across the Greek Political Spectrum.” In Greece in Crisis: Combining Critical Discourse and Corpus Linguistics Perspectives, ed. by Ourania Hatzidaki, and Dionysis Goutsos, 151–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatzidaki, Ourania, and Dionysis Goutsos
2017 “The Discourses of the Greek Crisis.” In Greece in Crisis: Combining Critical Discourse and Corpus Linguistics Perspectives, ed. by Ourania Hatzidaki, and Dionysis Goutsos, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, Elke
2012 “All Men Become Brothers. The Use of Kinship Terms for Non-related Persons as a Sign of Respect or Disrespect.” Linguistik Online 51 (1): 9–42.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley
2016 “Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis.” West European Politics 39 (5): 971–991. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopkinson, Chris
2014 “Face Effects of Verbal Antagonism in Online Discussions.” Brno Studies in English 40 (1): 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karlsen, Rune, Kari Steen-Johnsen, Dag Wollebæk, and Bernard Enjolras
2017 “Echo Chamber and Trench Warfare Dynamics in Online Debates.” European Journal of Communication 32(3): 257–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kietzmann, Jan H., Kristopher Hermkens, Ian P. McCarthy, and Bruno S. Silvestre
2011 “Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media.” Business Horizons 54 (3): 241–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F.
2019 Language, Gender, and Sexuality: An Introduction. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koutsoulelou, Stamatia
2017 “‘Crisis is Written all over me.’ Greek Songs in Times of Crisis.” In Greece in Crisis: Combining Critical Discourse and Corpus Linguistics Perspectives, ed. by Ourania Hatzidaki, and Dionysis Goutsos, 263–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, K. Hazel, and Anatoliy Gruzd
2017 “Is Aggression Contagious Online? A Case of Swearing on Donald Trump’s Campaign Videos on YouTube.” In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1999 “The Distribution and Function of Vocatives in American and British English Conversation.” Language and Computers 261: 107–120.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, and Jan Svartvik
2013 A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ljung, Magnus
2011 Swearing: A Cross-cultural Linguistic Study. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2578–2593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maras, Konstantinos
2016 “Discursive Constitutions: Constructing Selves and Others in the Framework of Parliamentary Debates on Crisis in Germany and Greece.” In FRAGMEX Report (Deliverable 6) Fragmentation and Exclusion: Understanding and Overcoming the Multiple Impacts of the European Crisis, Athens, Greece. http://​www​.fragmex​.eu​/myfiles​/d6​-Discursive​-constitutions​-Constructing​-selves​-and​-others​-in​-the​-framework​-of​-parliamentary​-debates​-on​-crisis​-in​-Germany​-and​-Greece​.pdf. Last accessed September 17, 2019.
Mazzon, Gabriella
2010 “Terms of Address.” Historical Pragmatics 81: 351–371.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2003 “What’s in a Name?’ Social Labeling and Gender Practices.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 69–97. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ofori, Emmanuel Amo
2017 “The Use of Insults to Challenge Political Authority: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Language 5 (1): 129–143.Google Scholar
Oz, Mustafa, Pei Zheng, and Gina Masullo Chen
2018 “Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing Incivility, Impoliteness, and Deliberative Attributes.” New Media and Society 20 (9): 3400–3419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubini, Monica, Alessandra Roncarati, Marcella Ravenna, Flavia Albarello, Silvia Moscatelli, and Gün R. Semin
2017 “Denying Psychological Properties of Girls and Prostitutes: The Role of Verbal Insults.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36 (2): 226–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
1992 Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown
2017 Taking Offence on Social Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte
2016 Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell
1991 The Fanatics: A Behavioural Approach to Political Violence. Sydney, Australia: Brassey’s.Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy
2017 “‘This is not a Political Party, this is Facebook!’: Political Jokes and Political (Mis)trust in Crisis-ridden Greece.” The European Journal of Humour Research 5 (4): 136–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1987 “Fallacies in Pragma-dialectical Perspective.” Argumentation 1 (3): 283–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasilopoulou, Sofia, Daphne Halikiopoulou, and Theofanis Exadaktylos
2014 “Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (2): 388–402.Google Scholar
Vladimirou, Dimitra, and Juliane House
2018 “Ludic Impoliteness and Globalisation on Twitter: ‘I Speak England very best’ #agglika_Tsipra, #Tsipras, #Clinton.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 149–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waddle, Maurice, and Peter Bull
2016 “Playing the Man, not the Ball: Personalisation in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (4): 412–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westling, Mike
2007 “Expanding the Public Sphere: The Impact of Facebook on Political Communication.” The New Vernacular 281: 1–13.Google Scholar
Xydopoulos, George J.
2009 “ ‘Psilo-’: Exploring the Case of a ‘Diminutive’ in Modern Greek.” In Selected Papers from the 18th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, ed. by Anastasios Tsangalidis, 397–405. Thessaloniki: Monochromia.Google Scholar
Yetkin, Nihal
2006 “A Pragmatic Analysis of Derogation in the Discourse of Political Criticism in the Turkish Grand National Assembly.” Modern Türklük Araştirmalari Dergisi 3 (1): 48–59.Google Scholar
Zago, Rafaele
2015 “‘That’s none of your business, Sy”: The Pragmatics of Vocatives in Film Dialogue.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, ed. by Marta Dynel, and Jan Chovanec, 183–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar