References

References

Agarwal, Amit
. n.d. Google Addons. Accessed January 30, 2018. https://​ctrlq​.org/
Albelda Marco, Marta
2007La intensificación como categoría pragmática: Revisión y propuesta. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Amón, Rubén
2019 “La campaña de la vergüenza.” El País, April 26.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2010Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bax, Stephen
2011Discourse and Genre: Using Language in Context. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, María
2007 “Categorización sociopragmática de la cortesía y de la descortesía: Un estudio de la conversación coloquial española.” Ph.D. Diss., Stockholm University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “El test de hábitos sociales aplicado a la descortesía.” In Cortesía y conversación: De lo escrito a lo oral. III Coloquio internacional Programa EDICE, edited by Antonio Briz, Antonio Hidalgo, Marta Albelda, Josefa Contreras and Nieves Hernández Flores, 623–41. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2001 “ ‘No diga chorradas…’ La descortesía en el debate político cara a cara. Una aproximación pragma-variacionista.” Oralia 1: 9–15.Google Scholar
2010 “Niveles en la caracterización de las estrategias discursivas. Aplicaciones al estudio de la descortesía en un corpus mediático.” Español Actual 94: 47–76.Google Scholar
2013 “ ‘No eres inteligente ni para tener amigos …Pues anda que tú! [You’re not even clever enough to have any friends …Look who’s talking!]’: A quantitative analysis of the production and reception of impoliteness in present-day Spanish reality television.” In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action, edited by Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 218–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Factores condicionantes en la producción y recepción de la descortesía en un reality show. Una aproximación variacionista.” Revista de Filología 32: 17–43.Google Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana
2008 “Perceptions of (Im)politeness in Venezuelan Spanish: The Role of Evaluation in Interaction.” Pragmatics 18: 605–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boretti, Susan
2003 “Test de hábitos sociales y la investigación de la cortesía.” In Actas del 1er Coloquio del Programa EDICE, edited by Diana Bravo, 198–202. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 19–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio
2004 “Cortesía verbal codificada y cortesía verbal interpretada en la conversación.” In Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español, edited by Diana Bravo, and Antonio Briz, 67–93. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
2017 “Otra vez sobre las funciones de la intensificación en la conversación coloquial.” Boletín de Filología 52(2): 37–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludvig, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coesemans, Roel, and Barbara De Cock
2017 “Self-reference by Politicians on Twitter: Strategies to Adapt to 140 Characters.” Journal of Pragmatics 116: 37–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Contreras Fernández, Josefa
2008 “Test de hábitos sociales en un análisis contrastivo sobre el uso y la interpretación de la cortesía lingüística. In Cortesía y conversación: De lo escrito a lo oral. III Coloquio internacional Programa EDICE, edited by Antonio Briz, Antonio Hidalgo, Marta Albelda, Josefa Contreras, and Nieves Hernández Flores, 642–56. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “The Metalanguage of Impoliteness: Using Sketch Engine to Explore the Oxford English Corpus .” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, edited by Paul Baker, 64–86. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Claire Hardaker
2016 “Pragmatics.” In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, edited by Paul Baker, and Jesse Egbert, 124–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll, and Claire Hardaker
2019 “Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 176–200. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Barbara, and Andrea Pizarro Pedraza
2018 “From Expressing Solidarity to Mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic Functions of Hashtags Starting with #jesuis across Languages.” Language in Society 47(2): 197–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela, and Phillipe Locke
2006English Grammar: A University Course. Oxon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Fernández García, Francisco
2016 “Mecanismos interaccionales al servicio de la descortesía en el debate político.” Spanish in Context 13(2): 263–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2009 “Descortesía y agresividad bajo el anonimato: Internet.” In Manifestaciones textuales de la descortesía y agresividad verbal en distintos ámbitos comunicativos, edited by Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez, and Esperanza Alcaide Lara, 188–2010. Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.Google Scholar
Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz, and Salvador Enguix Oliver
2016Pseudopolítica: El discurso político en las redes sociales. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2013 “El modelo del género y la des/cortesía clasificatoria de primer orden en las valoraciones de Sálvame por parte de la audiencia.” In (Des)cortesía para el espectáculo: Estudios de pragmática variacionista, edited by Catalina Fuentes, 167–96. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 134: 120–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2010 “A Genre Approach to Impoliteness in a Spanish Television Talkshow: Evidence from Corpus-Based Analysis, Questionnaires and Focus Groups.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4): 689–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Corpus-Based Metapragmatics.” In Methods in Pragmatics, edited by Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider, and Wolfram Bublitz, 619–43. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “The Metapragmatics of Consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 221–25. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández Flores, Nieves
2002La cortesía en la conversación española de familiares y amigos: La búsqueda del equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario, Aalborg: Institut for Sprog Internationale Kurturstudier. Aalborg Universitet, vol. 37.Google Scholar
2008 “El test de hábitos sociales en el análisis de debates televisivos.” In Cortesía y conversación: De lo escrito a lo oral. III Coloquio internacional Programa EDICE, edited by Antonio Briz, Antonio Hidalgo, Marta Albelda, Josefa Contreras, and Nieves Hernández Flores, 657–68. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut
2019 “Digital and Written Quotations in a News Text: The Hybrid Genre of Political Opinion Review.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, edited by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 133–62. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Taavitsainen, Irma, and Gerold Schneider
2012 “Semantic Corpus Trawling: Expressions of ‘Courtesy’ and ‘Politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus.” In Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics, edited by Carla Suhr, and Irma Taavitsainen. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/11​/jucker​_taavitsainen​_schneider/
Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaul de Marganleon, Silvia
2005 “Descortesía de fustigación por afiliación exacerbada o refractariedad. El discurso tanguero de la década del ‘20’.” In Estudios de la (des)cortesía en español. Categorías conceptuales y aplicaciones a corpora orales y escritos, edited by Diana Bravo, 299–318. Buenos Aires: Dunken.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vit Suchomel
2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on.” Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2578–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mancera Rueda, Ana
2014 “Cortesía en 140 caracteres: Interacciones en Twitter entre periodistas y prosumidores .” Revista de Filología 32: 163–80.Google Scholar
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán
2013El discurso político en Twitter. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moulinou, Iphigenia
2014 “Striving to Make a Difference: Linguistic Devices of Moral Indignation.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(1): 74–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mugford, Gerrard
2014 “Examining First-Order Localised Politeness: Mexican Positive Impoliteness Practices.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(1): 99–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Critical Intercultural Impoliteness: ‘Where Are you Located? Can you Please Transfer me to Someone Who is American?’” Journal of Pragmatics 134: 173–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murillo Medrano, Jorge
2006 “Significado de la cortesía lingüística a partir de la aplicación de un test de hábitos sociales en Costa Rica.” In Actas del II Coloquio del Programa EDICE, edited by Jorge Murillo Medrano, 116–36. San José: Universidad de Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Tertu, and Heli Tissari
2010 “Contextualizing Eighteenth-Century Politeness: Social Distinction and Metaphorical Levelling.” In Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and Change, edited by Raymond Hickey, 133–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2019 “Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 1–24. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pano Alamán, Ana
2015 “Ironía verbal y actividad de imagen en el discurso de políticos y ciudadanos españoles en Twitter.” Pragmática Sociocultural 3(1): 59–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Placencia, María Elena
2001 “Percepciones y manifestaciones de la (des)cortesía en la atención al público: El caso de una institución pública ecuatoriana.” Oralia 1: 177–212.Google Scholar
2008 “(Non)compliance with Directives among Family and Friends: Responding to Social Pressure and Individual Wants.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5(3): 315–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
1992Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2015 “Conceptualizing Politeness in Greek: Evidence from Twitter Corpora.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 25–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Conflict, Disagreement, and (Im)politeness.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, edited by Matthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 176–95. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria, and Spiridoula Bella
2019 “Twitter, Politeness, Self-presentation.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, edited by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 341–65. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria, and Angeliki Tzanne
2010 “Conceptualizations of Politeness and Impoliteness in Greek.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4): 661–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte
2015 “Beyond Sarcasm: The Metalanguage and Structures of Mock Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 87: 127–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-Appropriate Face-Attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 169–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, edited by Allan Bell, and Peter Garret, 21–63. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jeff
2000 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use.” Pragmatics 10(4): 463–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Sophia
2012 “ ‘It’s Rude to VP’: The Cultural Semantics of Rudeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1051–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
1992Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011 “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media and Society 13(5): 788–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017a “Evaluation.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, edited by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 435–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “Twitter.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, edited by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 201–224. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar