Cover not available
Article published In:
Critical perspectives on gender, politics and violence
Edited by Eleonora Esposito
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1] 2021
► pp. 47–75

“How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew” [*] *

A multimodal critical discursive approach to online misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube

ORCID logo | University of Navarra , Spain
ORCID logo | University of Napoli Federico II , Italy

On the occasion of the 2017 UK election campaign, Amnesty International conducted a large-scale, sentiment-based analysis of online hate speech against women MPs on Twitter (Dhrodia 2018), identifying the “Top 5” most attacked women MPs as Diane Abbott, Joanna Cherry, Emily Thornberry, Jess Phillips and Anna Soubry.

Taking Amnesty International’s results as a starting point, this paper investigates online misogyny against the “Top 5” women MPs, with a specific focus on the video-sharing platform YouΤube, whose loosely censored cyberspace is known as a breeding ground for antagonism, impunity and disinhibition (Pihlaja 2014), and, therefore, merits investigation.

By collecting and analysing a corpus of YouTube multimodal data we explore, critique and contextualize online misogyny as a techno-social phenomenon applying a Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) approach (KhosraviNik and Esposito 2018). Mapping a vast array of discursive strategies, this study offers an in-depth analysis on how technology-facilitated gender-based violence contributes to discursively constructing the political arena as a fundamentally male-oriented space, and reinforces stereotypical and sexist representation of women in politics and beyond.

Keywords: women MPs, misogyny, YouTube, multimodality, social media, Critical Discourse Studies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gendered violence in a jungle called YouTube
  • 3.Methods and data
    • 3.1A critical multimodal framework for social media data
    • 3.2Data collection and framework operationalization
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Discursive strategies of DTF violence
      • 4.1.1Strategies of body shaming
      • 4.1.2Strategies of gender stereotyping and gatekeeping
      • 4.1.3Strategies of moral degradation
      • 4.1.4Strategies of direct threatening and abuse
    • 4.2Multimodal strategies of DTF violence
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 22 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00053.esp
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Jana Tereick
2015 “YouTube: Language and Discourse Practices in Participatory Culture.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, edited by Alexandra Georgakopoulou and Tereza Spilioti, 354–370. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Diane
1992 Suffragettes in the Purple, White and Green: London 1906–1914. Museum of London.Google Scholar
Bailey, Jane, Valerie Steeves, Jacquelyn Burkell, and Priscilla Regan
2013 “Negotiating with Gender Stereotypes on Social Networking Sites: From ‘Bicycle Face’ to Facebook.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 37(2): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baynes, Chris
2019 “Carl Benjamin: Police Investigating Ukip Candidate’s Rape Comments about Labour MP Jess Phillips.” The Independent, May 7.Google Scholar
Benavides-Vanegas, Farid Samir
2020 “Emoticons, Memes and Cyberbullying: Gender Equality in Colombia.” Social Semiotics 30(3): 328–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benson, Phil
2017 The Discourse of YouTube Multimodal Text in a Global Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green
2009 YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Campus, Donatella
2013 Women Political Leaders and the Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Citron, Danielle K.
2014 Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis
2020 Making Sense. Reference, Agency, and Structure in a Grammar of Multimodal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár
(eds) 2017 “Introduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár, 1–8. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davey, Jennifer
2018 “Women and Politics”. The Oxford Handbook of Modern British Political History, 1800–2000, edited by David Brown, Robert Crowcroft and Gordon Pentland Brown, 417–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dhrodia, Azmina
2018 “Unsocial Media: A Toxic Place for Women.” IPPR Progressive Review 24(4): 380–387.Google Scholar
Döring, Nicola, and M. Rohangis Mohseni
2019 “Fail Videos and Related Video Comments on YouTube: A Case of Sexualization of Women and Gendered Hate Speech?” Communication Research Reports 36(3): 254–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora
2021 “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, James Paul
2005 “Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces: From the Age of Mythology to Today’s Schools.” In Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power and Social Context, edited by David Barton and Karin Tusting, 214–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ging, Debbie, and Eugenia Siapera
2018 “Special Issue on Online Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 515–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harjunen, Hannele
2016 Neoliberal Bodies and the Gendered Fat Body: The Fat Body in Focus. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)
2018 “Sexism, Harassment and Violence Against Women in Parliaments in Europe.” [URL]
Jane, Emma
2014 “ ‘Your a ugly, whorish, slut’ – Understanding E-bile.” Feminist Media Studies 14(4), 531–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism.” Continuum 30(3): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Gendered Cyberhate as Workplace Harassment and Economic Vandalism.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, and Rumiko Oyama
2000 “Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach.” In The Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by Theo van Leeuwen and Carey Jewitt, 134–156. London: Sage.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid
2018 “Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics.” Fundan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (ePub ahead of Print), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito
2018 “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-based Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14(1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Johann Unger
2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 3rd edn, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 205–234. London: Sage.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Mahrou Zia
2014 “Persian Nationalism, Identity and Anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook Discourses: Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media Communication.” Journal of Language and Politics 13(4): 755–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Nadia Sarkhoh
2017 “Arabism and anti-Persian Sentiments on Participatory Web: A Social Media Critical Discourse Study (SM-CDS).” International Journal of Communication 111: 3614–3633.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2002 “Colour as a Semiotic Mode: Notes for a Grammar of Colour.” Visual Communication 1(3): 343–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena
2020 Violence against Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, Rebecca
2021 “Incongruous and Illegitimate: Antisemitic and Islamophobic Semiotic Violence against Women in Politics in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manne, Kate
2017 Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mantilla, Karla
2013 “Gendertrolling: Misogyny Adapts to New Media.” Feminist Studies 39(2): 563–70.Google Scholar
Moor, Peter J., Ard Heuvelman, and Ria Verleur
2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1536–1546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murthy, Dhiraj, and Shubham Sharma
2018 “Visualizing YouTube’s Comment Space: Online Hostility as a Network Phenomena.” New Media & Society 21(1): 191–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha
2010 “Objectification and Internet Misogyny.” In The Offensive Internet, edited by Saul Levmore and Martha C. Nussbaum, 68–87. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan, and Charlotte Taylor
2018 The Language of Persuasion in Politics. An Introduction. London and New York.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen
2014 Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Powell, Anastasia, and Nicola Henry
2017 Sexual Violence in a Digital Age. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasulo, Margaret
2021 “Are Gold Hoop Earrings and a Dab of Red Lipstick enough to get even Democrats on the Offensive? The Case of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rego, Richard
2018 “Changing Forms and Platforms of Misogyny. Sexual Harassment of Women Journalists on Twitter.” Media Watch 9(3): 472–85.Google Scholar
Rotman, Dana, Jennifer Golbeck, and Jennifer Preece
2009 “The Community is where the Rapport is – On Sense and Structure in the YouTube Community.” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarkeesiaan, Anita
2015 “Stop the Trolls. Women Fight Back Online Harassment.” Women in the World. YouTube video.Google Scholar
Scott, Jennifer
2019 “Women MPs Say Abuse Forcing them from Politics.” BBC News. October 31.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laura
2018 “ ‘I Can Be your Tinder Nightmare’: Harassment and Misogyny in the Online Sexual Marketplace.” Feminism & Psychology 28(1): 69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titley, Gavan, Ellie Keen, and László Földi
2012 Starting Points for Combating Hate Speech Online: Three Studies about Online Hate Speech and Ways to Address it. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Van der Pas, Joanna Daphne, and Loes Aaldering
2020 “Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 70(1): 114–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1999 Speech, Music, Sound. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006 “Towards a Semiotics of Typography.” Information Design Journal 14(2): 139–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeiter, Kirsten, Sandra Pepera, Molly Middlehurst, and Derek Ruths
2019 Tweets that Chill: Analyzing Online Violence Against Women in Politics. National Democratic Institute. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Alam, Zainab
2021. Violence against women in politics. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Kopytowska, Monika
2021. Xenophobia, misogyny and rape culture. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Kuperberg, Rebecca
2021. Incongruous and illegitimate. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1 ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.