Cover not available
Article published In:
Critical perspectives on gender, politics and violence
Edited by Eleonora Esposito
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1] 2021
► pp. 127–154

Twitter and abortion

Online hate against pro-choice female politicians in Chile

ORCID logo | Universidad Andrés Bello Chile
ORCID logo | Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) Spain
This paper explores the misogynistic abuse against female Chilean politicians who openly supported a pro-choice bill that allowed the access to abortion in limited circumstances. We analysed the verbal abuse targeted at these politicians during the legislation of the abortion bill (2015–2017) and the linguistic and discursive patterns of online abuse. To that end, we collected tweets from this legislation period and created a subset with specific milestones of the parliamentary debate. Further, we undertook a corpus-assisted analysis of the data, focusing on collocations and keywords, which were then analysed in the light of van Leeuwen’s (2008) framework on the representation of social actors and legitimation strategies. Results evidence that violence against women in power can take forms other than the explicit sexual, physical, and psychological threats that are commonly identified. Violence targets these women as it is claimed that they are unsuitable to legislate for allegedly having tolerated and protected crime. Therefore, the corrective function of abuse takes the form of legal actions against their crimes.
Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, abortion, corpus-assisted methods, Twitter, online misogyny, Chile
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Abortion and violence against women
  • 3.Gendered hate and harassment online
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Collocations
  • 7.Keywords
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00056.per
References
Alam, Zainab
2021 “Violence against Women in Politics: The Case of Pakistani Women’s Activism.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alvares, Claudia
2018 “Online Staging of Femininity: Disciplining through Public Exposure in Brazilian Social Media.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 657–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International
2019 “Abortion Laws in the US – 10 Things You Need to Know.” August 31 2019 [URL]
Anderson, Kristin. L., and Jill Cermele
2014 “Public/Private Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 274–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
. AntConc (version 3.5.8). Windows. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University 2019.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2004 “Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency, and Sense in Keywords Analysis.” Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4): 346–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery
2005 “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michael Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
1986 “On Pedagogic Discourse.” In Handbook for Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, ed. by John Richardson, 205–290. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike
2006 The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette
1994 “Welfare State Regimes, Women’s Interests and the EC.” In Gendering Welfare States, ed. by Diane Sainsbury, 26–44. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1997 Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caneva, Hernán A.
2019 “Disputas por el Aborto en Argentina: Análisis Crítico de Discursos en Dos Organizaciones (2014–2016).” Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar
Centre for Reproductive Rights
2019 “The World’s Abortion Laws.” Accessed August 30, 2019. [URL]
Cohen, Stanley
2011 Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone
2017 El Segundo Sexo (15th ed.). Buenos Aires: Debolsillo.Google Scholar
Drange, Eli-Marie D.
2019 “No me banco la gente así. Un estudio comparativo del uso de palabras coloquiales y malsonantes en conversaciones informales en tres comunidades de habla hispanohablantes (‘I don’t like people like that.’ A comparative study of the use of colloquial and coarse language in informal conversations in three Spanish-speaking communities).” Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 10 (1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drange, Eli-Marie D., Ingrid Kristine Hasund, and Anna-Brita Stenström
2014 “ ‘Your mum!’ Teenagers’ Swearing by Mother in English, Spanish and Norwegian.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19 (1): 29–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Desconcierto
2016 “Informe de DD.HH. alerta que médicos chilenos dificultan la esterilización voluntaria de mujeres (Human Rights report warn Chilean doctors hinder voluntary sterilization for women).” El Desconcierto, November 7 2016 [URL]
Esposito, Eleonora
2021 “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagetti, Antonella
1986 “La moral cristiana y el aborto (Christian morality and abortion).” MA diss., Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michael
1977 Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez Molina, José Ramón
2003 “El insulto: una aproximación sociolingüística (Insults: A Sociolinguistic Approach).” In Lengua, variación y contexto: estudios dedicados a Humberto López Morales, ed. by Francisco Moreno Fernández, 639–653. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Mounia Lalmas, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates
2016 “Encouraging Diversity- and Representation-Awareness in Geographically Centralized Content.” In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM New York, March 2016, 7–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Mounia Lalmas
2020 “Every Colour you are: Stance Prediction and Turnaround in Controversial Issues.” In Proceedings of the WebSci ’20: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, ACM New York, July 2020, 174–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
2016 “ ‘Real Men don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández Campoy, Juan Manuel
1993 “Dialectología tradicional, sociolingüística laboviana y geolingüística trudgilliana: Tres aproximaciones al estudio de la variación (Traditional dialectology, Labovian sociolinguistics and Trudgillian geolinguistics: Three approaches to the study of variation).” ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante 91: 151–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jane, Emma A.
2014 “ ‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum – Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 28 (4): 558–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jane, Emma
2016 “Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism.” Continuum 30 (3): 284–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (1): 6–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito
2018 “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Biased Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissling, Elizabeth A.
1991 “Street Harassment: The Language of Sexual Terrorism.” Discourse and Society 2 (4): 451–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika
2021 “Xenophobia, Misogyny and Rape Culture: Targeting Women in Cyberspace.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lagarde, Marcela
2005 Los cautiverios de las mujeres: Madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas (Women’s captivity: Mother-wives, nuns, whores, prisoners and insane). Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.Google Scholar
Lycarião, Diógenes, and Marcelo Alves dos Santos
2017 “Bridging Semantic and Social Network Analyses: The Case of the Hashtag #precisamosfalarsobreaborto (‘we need to talk about abortion’) on Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (3): 368–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministerio de Salud
, Fija directrices para los servicios de salud sobre esterilización femenina y masculina, Res. 2326 exenta, November 30 2000, [URL]
, Regula la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales, Ley Número 21.030, September 23 2017, [URL]
Morán Faúndes, José. M.
2017 De vida o muerte. Patriarcado, heteronormatividad y el discurso de la vida del activismo “pro-vida” en la Argentina (On life and death. patriarchy, heteronormativity and the discourse of life in pro-life activism in Argentina). Córdoba: Centro de Estudios Avanzados.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura
1989 “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” In Visual and Other Pleasures, ed. by Laura Mulvey, 14–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, Camila
2014 “¿Por qué algunos políticos ‘juran’ y otros ‘prometen’? (Why do some politicians ‘swear in’ and others ‘promise’)”. Bio Bio, March 11 2014 [URL]
Nussbaum, Martha C.
1995 “Objectification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 24 (4): 249–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Objectification and Internet Misogyny.” The Offensive Internet, ed. by Saul Levmore, and Martha C. Nussbaum, 68–87. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Ciara, and Christina Zampas
2018 “The Human Rights Impact of Gender Stereotyping in the Context of Reproductive Health Care.” Gynecology & Obstetrics 144 (1): 116–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann Unger, and Michele Zappavigna
2014 Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2006 “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 267–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor
2013 Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlinger, Deana
2006 “Friends and Foes: Media, Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War.” Social Problems 53 (4): 537–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas, Darío
2012 “ Huevón como marcador del discurso en el español de Chile: Huellas de un proceso de gramaticalización ( Huevón as a discourse marker in Chilean Spanish: Traces of a grammaticalization process).” Revista de Humanidades (25): 145–164.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, Jason
2001 “Judgment on ‘Nuremberg’: An Analysis of Free Speech and Anti-Abortion Threats Made on the Internet.” Journal of Science & Technology Law – Boston University 52 (7): 52–80.Google Scholar
Sepúlveda, Raquel
2017 “Un análisis histórico sobre los modelos mentales que entregan los políticos en el debate sobre la ley de la despenalización del aborto en Chile (A historical analysis of politicians’ mental models on the debate about the de-criminalization of abortion in Chile).” MA diss., University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Simon, Roberto
2019 “From Scandal to Reforms: Chile’s Unusual Breakthrough.” Americas Quarterly July 22 2019 [URL]
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2006 “Taboo Words in Teenage Talk: London and Madrid Girls’ Conversations Compared.” Spanish in Context 3 (1): 115–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2001 Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sundén, Jenny, and Susanna Paasonen
2018 “Shameless Hags and Tolerance Whores: Feminist Resistance and the Affective Circuits of Online Hate.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 643–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte, and Anna Marchi
2018 Corpus Approaches to Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laura
2018 “ ‘I Can Be your Tinder Nightmare’: Harassment and Misogyny in the Online Sexual Marketplace.” Feminism & Psychology 28 (1): 69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaggione, Juan M.
2005 “Reactive Politicization and Religious Dissidence: The Political Mutations of the Religious.” Social Theory and Practice 31 (2): 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivanco, José. M.
2018 “A Backward Step for Reproductive Rights in Chile.” Human Rights Watch, April 16 2018 Accessed September 3, 2019. [URL]
Williams, Timothy, and Alan Blinder
2019 “Lawmakers Vote to Effectively Ban Abortion in Alabama.” The New York Times, May 14 2019 [URL]
Zappavigna, Michele
2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar