Cover not available
Article published In:
Young researchers in action
Edited by Angeliki Tzanne
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1] 2022
► pp. 13–37

“Congratulations! You just won the title for ‘worse Tinder opening line’”

Inappropriate behaviour and impoliteness in online dating

| National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Often preferred to its face-to-face counterpart, online dating has transformed the way we perceive practices relevant to meeting people, mostly because it offers “a wider pool of potential partners” (Heino, Ellison, and Gibbs 2010, 428). Despite its popularity, however, online dating is an under-researched area in general, crucially in linguistics. Looking at (mostly unsuccessful) naturally occurring initial interactions that have taken place on the popular Tinder application, the aim of this study is to gain some insights into the relationship among language aggression, impoliteness and communication failure in the context of flirting on Tinder. Results show that the most common way that users initiate interaction in this dataset is through sexually loaded language, which seems to be understood as a breach of the norms of appropriateness for first-time contact. Although Tinder has no manual to prescribe what should or should not be said in interaction, it transpires from the data that avoiding overstepping in terms of sexual matters (i.e. refraining from using sexually loaded language and/or innuendos) functions as an unwritten law which sparks impoliteness when not followed. Resulting impoliteness manifests itself mostly through the strategies of sarcasm and ignoring/snubbing the other, used to counteract (perceived) inappropriateness. Tracing this escalation of non-cooperative practices, from inappropriateness to impoliteness, also provides the opportunity to examine the emergence of playfulness and creativity as language behaviours interwoven with aggression. Therefore, online dating seems to lend itself well to the study of impoliteness and violation of norms of appropriate behaviour, providing opportunities for an expansion of contexts for linguistic analysis.

Keywords: online dating, Tinder, norms, impoliteness, aggression, playfulness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Online dating and Tinder
    • 2.2Impoliteness in recent theorising
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Aggression on the part of the speaker: ‘Nightmarish’ pick-up lines
    • 4.2Aggression on the part of the hearer: Negative evaluations and impoliteness
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00063.kav
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2011 “Language Change and Digital Media : A Review of Conceptions and Evidence.” In Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, edited by Nikolas Coupland and Tore Kristiansen, 145–161. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Ardington, Angela
2013 “Negotiating Shared Perspectives that Move in and out of Sociability: Play and Aggression in Technologically Mediated Communication.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (2): 165–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayraktaroǧlu, Arın, and Maria Sifianou
2012 “The Iron Fist in a Velvet Glove: How Politeness Can Contribute to Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (2): 143–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, Kirsty, and Sharon Delmege
2012 “The Filtered Encounter: Online Dating and the Problem of Filtering through Excessive Information.” Social Semiotics 22 (3): 237–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bor, Stephanie, and Jan Boehmer
2002 “The Internet.” In Communication Technology Update and Fundamentals, edited by August E. Grant and Jennifer H. Meadows, 275–282. Boston: Focal Press.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 “Impoliteness in the Struggle for Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 127–153. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 101–134. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chayko, Mary
2008 Portable Communities: The Social Dynamics of Online and Mobile Connectedness. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 17–44. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
del-Teso-Craviotto, Marisol
2006 “Language and Sexuality in Spanish and English Dating Chats.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (4): 460–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2015 “The Landscape of Impoliteness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 329–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellison, Nicole B., Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs
2006 “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 415–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiore, Andrew T., Lindsay, Shaw T., Xiaomeng Zhong, G. A. Mendelsohn, and Coye Cheshire
2010 “Who’s Right and Who Writes: People, Profiles, Contacts, and Replies in Online Dating.” In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. Los Alamitos, CA: Computer Society Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990 “Perspectives on Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 219–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/Politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 120–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gatter, Karoline, and Kathleen Hodkinson
2016 “On the Differences between TinderTM versus Online Dating Agencies: Questioning a Myth. An Exploratory Study.” Cogent Psychology 3 (1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gershon, Ilana
2010 “Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Media Switching and Media Ideologies.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20 (2): 389–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jennifer L., Nicole B. Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai
2011 “First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating.” Communication Research 38 (1): 70–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage L.
2007 “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict, (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-Mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 742–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “A Manual for (Im)Politeness?: The Impact of the FAQ in an Electronic Community of Practice.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker
2017 “(Im)politeness in Digital Communication.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Karen
2011 “ ‘First Order’ and ‘Second Order’ Politeness: Institutional and Intercultural Contexts.” In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, edited by LPRG, 167–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Jeffrey A., Steve Carter, Michael J. Cody, and Julie M. Albright
2010 “Individual Differences in the Communication of Romantic Interest: Development of the Flirting Styles Inventory.” Communication Quarterly 58 (4): 365–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “ ‘Uh. … Not to Be Nitpicky,,,,,But…the Past Tense of Drag Is Dragged, Not Drug.’: An Overview of Trolling Strategies.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1): 58–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasinoff, Amy Adele
2013 “Sexting as Media Production: Rethinking Social Media and Sexuality.” New Media and Society 15 (4): 449–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasinoff, Amy Adele, and Tamara Shepherd
2014 “Sexting in Context: Privacy Norms and Expectations.” International Journal of Communication 8 (1): 2932–2955. [URL]
Haugh, Michael
2010 “When Is an Email Really Offensive?: Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (1): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Im/Politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 36–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “ ‘Just Kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-Serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951: 120–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh
2015 “Self-Disclosure in Initial Interactions amongst Speakers of American and Australian English.” Multilingua 34 (4): 461–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore
2018 “Getting to Know You: Teasing as an Invitation to Intimacy in Initial Interactions.” Discourse Studies 20 (2): 246–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills
2013 “Interpersonal Pragmatics: Issues and Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heino, Rebecca D., Nicole B. Ellison, and Jennifer L. Gibbs
2010 “Relationshopping: Investigating the Market Metaphor in Online Dating.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27 (4): 427–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Kirk Job-Sluder, Rebecca Scheckler, and Sasha Barab
2002 Searching for Safety Online: Managing “Trolling” in a Feminist Forum. The Information Society 18 (5): 371–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F.
2011 “The Interactional Construction of Desire as Gender.” Gender and Language 5 (2): 211–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Flirting and ‘Normative’ Sexualities.” Journal of Language and Sexuality 2 (1): 101–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lea, Martin, Russell Spears, and Daphne de Groot
2001 “Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (5): 526–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LPRG – Linguistic Politeness Research Group
2011 “Introduction: The Linguistic Politeness Research Group”. In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, edited by LPRG, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield
2008 “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-Line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2578–2593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Anita K.
2005 “Young Women’s Dating Behavior: Why/Why Not Date a Nice Guy?” Sex Roles 53 (5–6): 347–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristine Køhler
2015 “Informed Consent in the Field of Language and Sexuality: The Case of Online Dating Research.” Journal of Language and Sexuality 4 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Flirting in Online Dating: Giving Empirical Grounds to Flirtatious Implicitness.” Discourse Studies 19 (5): 581–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murnen, Sarah K.
2000 “Gender and the Use of Sexually Degrading Language.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 24 (4): 319–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2019 “Im/Politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives : An Overview of the Field.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pillet-Shore, Danielle
2011 “Doing Introductions: The Work Involved in Meeting Someone New.” Communication Monographs 78 (1): 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reed, Lauren A., Richard M. Tolman, and L. Monique Ward
2016 “Snooping and Sexting: Digital Media as a Context for Dating Aggression and Abuse Among College Students.” Violence Against Women 22 (13): 1556–1576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
1988 Small Talk: Analyzing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Google Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2015 “ ‘There’s Definitely Gonna Be Some Serious Carnage in this House’ or How to be Genuinely Impolite in Big Brother UK.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(2): 317–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Surra, Catherine A., and Jill M. Boelter
2013 “Dating and Mate Selection.” In Handbook of Marriage and the Family, edited by Gary W. Peterson and Kevin R. Bush, 211–32. US: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Surra, Catherine A., Christine R. Gray, Tyfany M. J. Boettcher, Nathan R. Cottle, and Adam R. West
2006 “From Courtship to Universal Properties: Research on Dating and Mate Selection, 1950 to 2003.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited by Anita L. Vangelisti and Daniel Perlman, 113–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teneketzi, Korallia
2022 “Impoliteness across Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Study of Conflict on YouTube and Reddit.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2008 “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Turner, Tammara Combs, Marc A. Smith, Danyel Fisher, and Howard T. Welser
2005 Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyson, Gareth, Vasile C. Perta, Hamed Haddadi, and Michael C. Seto
2016 “A First Look at User Activity on Tinder.” In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 461–466. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Janelle
2017 “What Are You Doing on Tinder? Impression Management on a Matchmaking Mobile App.” Information Communication and Society 20 (11): 1644–1659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

van der Zanden, Tess, Alexander P. Schouten, Maria B. J. Mos, Emiel J. Krahmer & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon
2022. Originality in online dating profile texts: How does perceived originality affect impression formation and what makes a text original?. PLOS ONE 17:10 ► pp. e0274860 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.