Article published in:
Young researchers in actionEdited by Angeliki Tzanne
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1] 2022
► pp. 13–37
“Congratulations! You just won the title for ‘worse Tinder opening line’”
Inappropriate behaviour and impoliteness in online dating
Evanthia Kavroulaki | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Often preferred to its face-to-face counterpart, online dating has transformed the way we perceive practices
relevant to meeting people, mostly because it offers “a wider pool of potential partners” (Heino, Ellison, and Gibbs 2010, 428). Despite its popularity, however, online dating is an under-researched area in
general, crucially in linguistics. Looking at (mostly unsuccessful) naturally occurring initial interactions that have taken place
on the popular Tinder application, the aim of this study is to gain some insights into the relationship among language aggression,
impoliteness and communication failure in the context of flirting on Tinder. Results show that the most common way that users
initiate interaction in this dataset is through sexually loaded language, which seems to be understood as a breach of the norms of
appropriateness for first-time contact. Although Tinder has no manual to prescribe what should or should not be said in
interaction, it transpires from the data that avoiding overstepping in terms of sexual matters (i.e. refraining from using
sexually loaded language and/or innuendos) functions as an unwritten law which sparks impoliteness when not followed. Resulting
impoliteness manifests itself mostly through the strategies of sarcasm and ignoring/snubbing the other, used to counteract
(perceived) inappropriateness. Tracing this escalation of non-cooperative practices, from inappropriateness to impoliteness, also
provides the opportunity to examine the emergence of playfulness and creativity as language behaviours interwoven with aggression.
Therefore, online dating seems to lend itself well to the study of impoliteness and violation of norms of appropriate behaviour,
providing opportunities for an expansion of contexts for linguistic analysis.
Keywords: online dating, Tinder, norms, impoliteness, aggression, playfulness
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Online dating and Tinder
- 2.2Impoliteness in recent theorising
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Aggression on the part of the speaker: ‘Nightmarish’ pick-up lines
- 4.2Aggression on the part of the hearer: Negative evaluations and impoliteness
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 25 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00063.kav
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00063.kav
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
Ardington, Angela
Bayraktaroǧlu, Arın, and Maria Sifianou
Best, Kirsty, and Sharon Delmege
Bor, Stephanie, and Jan Boehmer
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés Conejos Blitvich
Bousfield, Derek
Chayko, Mary
Culpeper, Jonathan
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
del-Teso-Craviotto, Marisol
Dynel, Marta
Ellison, Nicole B., Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs
Fiore, Andrew T., Lindsay, Shaw T., Xiaomeng Zhong, G. A. Mendelsohn, and Coye Cheshire
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
Gatter, Karoline, and Kathleen Hodkinson
Gershon, Ilana
Gibbs, Jennifer L., Nicole B. Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai
Graham, Sage L.
Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker
Grainger, Karen
Hall, Jeffrey A., Steve Carter, Michael J. Cody, and Julie M. Albright
Hardaker, Claire
Hasinoff, Amy Adele
Hasinoff, Amy Adele, and Tamara Shepherd
2014 “Sexting
in Context: Privacy Norms and Expectations.” International Journal of
Communication 8 (1): 2932–2955. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2264
Haugh, Michael
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh
Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills
Heino, Rebecca D., Nicole B. Ellison, and Jennifer L. Gibbs
Herring, Susan C., Kirk Job-Sluder, Rebecca Scheckler, and Sasha Barab
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
Kiesling, Scott F.
Lea, Martin, Russell Spears, and Daphne de Groot
LPRG – Linguistic Politeness Research
Group
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
McDaniel, Anita K.
Mortensen, Kristine Køhler
Murnen, Sarah K.
Ogiermann, Eva, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2019 “Im/Politeness
between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives : An Overview of the
Field.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness:
Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Pillet-Shore, Danielle
Reed, Lauren A., Richard M. Tolman, and L. Monique Ward
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
Surra, Catherine A., and Jill M. Boelter
Surra, Catherine A., Christine R. Gray, Tyfany M. J. Boettcher, Nathan R. Cottle, and Adam R. West
Teneketzi, Korallia
Terkourafi, Marina
Turner, Tammara Combs, Marc A. Smith, Danyel Fisher, and Howard T. Welser
Tyson, Gareth, Vasile C. Perta, Hamed Haddadi, and Michael C. Seto
Ward, Janelle