Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 11:2 (2023) ► pp.176199
References
Albelda Marco, Marta
Albelda Marco, Marta
. forth. 2022 “¿No te das cuenta de que me estás molestando? Las recriminaciones intensificadas mediante preguntas retóricas” (‘Can’t you see you’re hassling me? Intensified reproaches expressed by rhetorical questions’). Lingüística Española Actual. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albelda Marco, Marta, and Maria Estellés
2021 “De nuevo sobre la intensificación pragmática: revisión y propuesta” (‘Revisiting pragmatic intensification: revision and definition proposal’). Estudios Románicos 301: 15–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcaide Lara, Esperanza. R.
2019 “Imagen social y contextos socioculturales en el discurso publicitario institucional español con fines sociales (‘Social face and sociocultural contexts in the discourse of official advertising for social purposes’)”. Sociocultural Pragmatics 7(3): 297–334.Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Gloria
1982 “The Rhetorical Question as an Indirect Speech Device in English and Italian.” Canadian Modern Language Review 381: 290–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ballmer, Thomas T., and Waltrau Brennenstuhl
1981Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertomeu, Pau
2022Peticiones en alemán y español: un estudio contrastivo a partir de Gran Hermano (‘Requests in German and Spanish: a contrastive study based on Big Brother’). Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanco, Antonio
2008 “Cómo hacer cosas malas con las palabras: actos ilocucionarios hostiles y los fundamentos de la teoría actos de habla (‘How to do bad things with words: hostile illocutionary acts and the basics of speech act theory’).” CRÍTICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 40(118): 3–27.Google Scholar
Bosque Muñoz, Ignacio
1980Sobre la negación (‘On negation’). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Face in Conflict.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 37–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana
1993 “Social Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 103–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Nagging: The Familial Conflict Arena.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 49–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana, and Joseph Radice
2018 “Bickering. A Conflict Speech Behavior of Close Social Distance.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6(2): 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz Gómez, Antonio
2017 “Una propuesta funcional para el análisis de la estrategia pragmática intensificadora en la conversación coloquial (‘A functional proposal for analysing intensifying pragmatic strategies in colloquial conversation’).” In Atenuación e intensificación en géneros discursivos (‘Mitigation and intensification in discourse genres’)”, ed. by Marta Albelda, and Wiltrud Mihatsch, 43–67. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burguera Serra, Joan
2009Gramática y pragmática de la interrogación retórica en español. Una aplicación al debate parlamentario (‘Grammar and pragmatics of rhetorical questions in Spanish. An application to parliamentary debate’). Barcelona: University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002 “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication 52(4): 749–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2005 “Per una nuova classificazione dell’illocuzione a partire da un corpus di parlato (LABLITA) (‘Towards a new classification of illocution based on a spoken corpus’)”. In Tradizione e innovazione: il parlato (‘Tradition and innovation: speech’), ed. by Elisabeth Burr, 233–246. Pisa: Cesati.Google Scholar
D’Amico-Reissner, Lynne
1985 “An Ethnolinguistic Study of Disapproval Exchanges.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Escandell, María Victoria
1987La interrogación en español: semántica y pragmática (‘Questions in Spanish: semantics and pragmatics’) Madrid: Universidad Complutense.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
1998 “Regularity and Idiomacity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone ”. Language 84/31: 501–538.Google Scholar
Furuta, Yumie
2017Clasificación de los verbos del español atendiendo a la configuración de sus argumentos oracionales (‘Classification of Spanish verbs according to the configuration of their sentence-level arguments’). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gancedo, Marta
2019Evolución de la imagen de rol familiar en el teatro de finales del siglo XIX a mitad del XX. Su manifestación en la atenuación e intensificación de los actos directivos (‘Evolution of the image of the role of the family in the theatre from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. As shown in mitigation and intensification of directive acts’). Valencia: University of Valencia.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2013 “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Impoliteness and Conflict in Spanish”. In The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics, ed. by Dale Koike, and César Félix-Brasdefer, 371–386. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
García-Miguel, José María, and Susana Comesaña
2004 “Verbs of Cognition in Spanish: Constructional Schemas and Reference Points.” In Linguagem, Cultura e Cognição. Estudios de Lingüistica Cognitiva (‘Language, Culture and Cognition. Cognitive Linguistics Studies’), ed. by Augusto Soares, Amadeu Torres, and Miguel Gonçalves, 399–419. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
García-Ramón, Amparo
2018Epistemicidad en interacción: (a)simetrías epistémicas en secuencias de acuerdo y su relación con la construcción de roles funcionales en conversaciones y entrevistas (‘Epistemicity in interaction: epistemic (a)symmetries in agreement sequences and their relation to the construction of functional roles in conversations and interviews’). Valencia: University of ValenciaGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D.
(ed.) 1990Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael
1979 “The Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 8(1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
2006 “Aspectos pragmalingüísticos de la interrogación en español con atención especial a las secuencias de preguntas (‘Pragmalinguistic aspects of questions in Spanish with particular attention to question sequences’).” Cultura, lenguaje y representación 31: 27–40.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilgizovna, Ikhsanova
2018 “The Pragmatic Potential of Rhetorical Questions in English Informal Speech.” Paper presented at 78º Eurasian Scientific Association, Moscow.
Ilie, Cornelia
1994What else can I tell you? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell International.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
1988 “Variation in Interlanguage Speech Act Realization.” University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL 7(2): 117–142.Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene
2005Beyond Rhetorical Questions. Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, Choon-Kyu, and David A. Dinneen
(eds.) 1979Syntax & Semantics. Vol. 111: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Olshtain, Elite, and Liora Weinbach
1987 “Complaints: A Study of Speech Act Behavior among Native and Nonnative Speakers of Hebrew. In The Pragmatic Perspective, ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi), 195–208. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena
2001Illocution and Cognition: A Constructional Approach. Logroño: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Rioja.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian
2005L’argumentation: histoire, théories et perspectives. París: Presses universitaires. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Radefeldt, Jürgen
1977 “On So-called Rhetorical Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 375–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neilson
(ed.) 1982Mutual Knowledge. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Soler, Amparo
2021Semántica de creo. Análisis cognitivo de la polisemia de una forma verbal doxástica en la interacción oral en español. (‘Semantics of creo: Cognitive analysis of the polysemy of a doxastic verb form in oral interaction in Spanish’). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Spanish Royal Academy: Databank (CORPES) [online database]
Corpus del español del siglo XXI [URL] Last accessed: August 2021.
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew
2008 “Introduction: Questioning and Affiliation/ Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 10(1): 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1986 “The Dynamics of Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction.” Doctoral Dissertation. University of Lancaster.
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uclés, Gloria
2021Atenuación y actividades de imagen en México y España a través de marcadores de control del contacto (‘Mitigation and face activities in Mexico and Spain through phatic markers’). Valencia: University of Valencia.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Robert
2003 “Negative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance.” Journal of Semantics 201: 239–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Ake
1983 “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study.” Linguistics 211: 123–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1987English Speech Act Verbs. A Semantic Dictionary. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Carvalho, Paula, Danielle Caled, Cláudia Silva, Fernando Batista & Ricardo Ribeiro
Linares-Bernabéu, Esther
2023. Mediating through question-asking: A sociopragmatic analysis of epistemic stance negotiation in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 213  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Silva, Cláudia & Paula Carvalho
2023. When Can Compliments and Humour Be Considered Hate Speech? A Perspective From Target Groups in Portugal. Comunicação e Sociedade 43  pp. e023006 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.