Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices
This paper studies rhetorical questions containing cognitive verbs that function as reproaches in Spanish. Its two
main goals are to determine the degree of specialization of rhetorical questions as reproaches and to examine the characterization
of reproaching as a speech act, indicating the distinctive features that distinguish it from other similar speech acts.
Based on a contextual analysis of approximately 500 instances of reproaches in conflict talk drawn from the
Spanish Royal Academy’s Corpes XXI corpus, I identify and describe the most commonly used cognitive verbs and syntactic structures used
in rhetorical questions. The results show that reproach is a reactive-provocative speech act in which the speaker reacts to a
contradiction perceived in their interlocutor’s words, actions or thoughts. The speaker appeals to their interlocutor’s moral
conscience, making them think about this inconsistency; finally, the speaker creates the expectation of a duty that should have
been carried out by the interlocutor.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1The reproach as a hostile act
- 2.2The illocutionary force of the reproach
- 2.3Features that characterize rhetorical questions in relation to reproaching
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Preliminary data: Cognitive perception verbs in RQ reproaches
- 3.2Final corpus and data retrieval
- 4.Analysis and results
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1RQs with cognitive verbs as reproaches
- 5.2Reproaching as a speech act
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
Albelda Marco, Marta
. forth.
2022 “
¿No te das cuenta de que me estás molestando? Las recriminaciones intensificadas mediante preguntas
retóricas” (‘Can’t you see you’re hassling me? Intensified reproaches
expressed by rhetorical questions’).
Lingüística Española
Actual.
Albelda Marco, Marta, and Maria Estellés
2021 “
De nuevo sobre la intensificación pragmática: revisión y propuesta” (‘Revisiting pragmatic intensification: revision and definition proposal’).
Estudios
Románicos 301: 15–37.
Alcaide Lara, Esperanza. R.
2019 “
Imagen social y
contextos socioculturales en el discurso publicitario institucional español con fines
sociales (‘Social face and sociocultural contexts in the discourse of
official advertising for social purposes’)”.
Sociocultural
Pragmatics 7(3): 297–334.
Anzilotti, Gloria
1982 “
The
Rhetorical Question as an Indirect Speech Device in English and Italian.”
Canadian Modern
Language Review 381: 290–302.
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979 Linguistic
Communication and Speech Acts. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Ballmer, Thomas T., and Waltrau Brennenstuhl
1981 Speech
Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity
Verbs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Bertomeu, Pau
2022 Peticiones en alemán y español: un estudio contrastivo a partir de Gran Hermano (‘
Requests in German and Spanish: a contrastive study based on Big Brother’). Bern: Peter Lang.
Blanco, Antonio
2008 “
Cómo hacer cosas malas con las palabras: actos ilocucionarios hostiles y los fundamentos de la teoría actos de
habla (‘How to do bad things with words: hostile illocutionary acts and the
basics of speech act theory’).”
CRÍTICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de
Filosofía 40(118): 3–27.
Bosque Muñoz, Ignacio
1980 Sobre la negación (‘
On
negation’). Madrid: Cátedra.
Bousfield, Derek
2013 “
Face
in Conflict.”
Journal of Language Aggression and
Conflict 1(1): 37–57.
Boxer, Diana
1993 “
Social
Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 191: 103–125.
Boxer, Diana
2002 “
Nagging:
The Familial Conflict Arena.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 341: 49–61.
Boxer, Diana, and Joseph Radice
Briz Gómez, Antonio
2017 “
Una propuesta funcional para el análisis de la estrategia pragmática intensificadora en la conversación
coloquial (‘A functional proposal for analysing intensifying pragmatic
strategies in colloquial conversation’).” In
Atenuación e
intensificación en géneros discursivos (‘
Mitigation and intensification in
discourse genres’)”, ed. by
Marta Albelda, and
Wiltrud Mihatsch, 43–67. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burguera Serra, Joan
2009 Gramática y pragmática de la interrogación retórica en español. Una aplicación al debate
parlamentario (‘
Grammar and pragmatics of rhetorical questions in Spanish. An
application to parliamentary
debate’). Barcelona: University of Barcelona.
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002 “
Questioning
Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and
Reagan.”
Journal of
Communication 52(4): 749–75.
Cresti, Emanuela
2005 “
Per una nuova classificazione dell’illocuzione a partire da un corpus di parlato
(LABLITA) (‘Towards a new classification of illocution based on a spoken
corpus’)”. In
Tradizione e innovazione: il
parlato (‘
Tradition and innovation: speech’), ed.
by
Elisabeth Burr, 233–246. Pisa: Cesati.
D’Amico-Reissner, Lynne
1985 “
An
Ethnolinguistic Study of Disapproval Exchanges.” Ph.D.
dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Escandell, María Victoria
1987 La interrogación
en español: semántica y pragmática (‘
Questions in Spanish: semantics and
pragmatics’) Madrid: Universidad Complutense.
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
1998 “
Regularity
and Idiomacity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let
Alone
”.
Language 84/31: 501–538.
Furuta, Yumie
2017 Clasificación de los verbos del español atendiendo a la configuración de sus argumentos
oracionales (‘
Classification of Spanish verbs according to the configuration of
their sentence-level
arguments’). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Gancedo, Marta
2019 Evolución de la imagen de rol familiar en el teatro de finales del siglo XIX a mitad del XX. Su manifestación en
la atenuación e intensificación de los actos directivos (‘
Evolution of the image
of the role of the family in the theatre from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. As shown in mitigation and
intensification of directive
acts’). Valencia: University of Valencia.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2013 “
Introduction:
Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice
Theory.”
Journal of Politeness
Research 9(1): 1–33.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2021 “
Impoliteness
and Conflict in Spanish”. In
The Routledge Handbook of Spanish
Pragmatics, ed. by
Dale Koike, and
César Félix-Brasdefer, 371–386. London: Routledge.
García-Miguel, José María, and Susana Comesaña
2004 “
Verbs
of Cognition in Spanish: Constructional Schemas and Reference
Points.” In
Linguagem, Cultura e Cognição. Estudios de
Lingüistica Cognitiva (‘
Language, Culture and Cognition. Cognitive Linguistics
Studies’), ed. by
Augusto Soares,
Amadeu Torres, and
Miguel Gonçalves, 399–419. Coimbra: Almedina.
García-Ramón, Amparo
2018 Epistemicidad en interacción: (a)simetrías epistémicas en secuencias de acuerdo y su relación con la
construcción de roles funcionales en conversaciones y entrevistas (‘
Epistemicity
in interaction: epistemic (a)symmetries in agreement sequences and their relation to the construction of functional roles in
conversations and
interviews’). Valencia: University of Valencia
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions
at Work: The Nature of Generalization in
Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grimshaw, Allen D.
(ed.) 1990 Conflict
Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in
Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hancher, Michael
1979 “
The
Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”.
Language in
Society 8(1): 1–14.
Haverkate, Henk
2006 “
Aspectos pragmalingüísticos de la interrogación en español con atención especial a las secuencias de
preguntas (‘Pragmalinguistic aspects of questions in Spanish with particular
attention to question sequences’).”
Cultura, lenguaje y
representación 31: 27–40.
Heritage, John
2011 “
Territories
of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in
Interaction.” In
The Morality of Knowledge in
Conversation, ed. by
Tanya Stivers,
Lorenza Mondada, and
Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ilgizovna, Ikhsanova
2018 “
The
Pragmatic Potential of Rhetorical Questions in English Informal Speech.” Paper presented
at 78º Eurasian Scientific
Association, Moscow.
Ilie, Cornelia
1994 What
else can I tell you? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative
Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell International.
Kasper, Gabriele
1988 “
Variation
in Interlanguage Speech Act Realization.”
University of Hawai’i Working Papers in
ESL 7(2): 117–142.
Oh, Choon-Kyu, and David A. Dinneen
(eds.) 1979 Syntax
&
Semantics. Vol. 111:
Presupposition. New York: Academic Press.
Olshtain, Elite, and Liora Weinbach
Pérez Hernández, Lorena
2001 Illocution
and Cognition: A Constructional
Approach. Logroño: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Rioja.
Plantin, Christian
2005 L’argumentation:
histoire, théories et perspectives. París: Presses universitaires.
Schmidt-Radefeldt, Jürgen
1977 “
On
So-called Rhetorical Questions.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 11: 375–392.
Searle, John
1969 Speech
Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Neilson
(ed.) 1982 Mutual
Knowledge. New York: Academic Press.
Soler, Amparo
2021 Semántica de creo. Análisis cognitivo de la polisemia de una forma verbal doxástica en la interacción oral en
español. (‘
Semantics of creo: Cognitive analysis of the polysemy of a doxastic
verb form in oral interaction in
Spanish’). Bern: Peter Lang.
Spanish Royal Academy: Databank (CORPES) [online database]
Corpus del español del siglo XXI [URL] Last accessed: August 2021.
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew
2008 “
Introduction:
Questioning and Affiliation/ Disaffiliation in Interaction.”
Discourse
Studies 10(1): 5–15.
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “
Stance,
Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of
Affiliation.”
Research on Language & Social
Interaction 41(1): 31–57.
Thomas, Jenny
1986 “
The
Dynamics of Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction.” Doctoral
Dissertation. University of Lancaster.
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Graeme Trousdale
2013 Constructionalization
and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uclés, Gloria
2021 Atenuación y actividades de imagen en México y España a través de marcadores de control del
contacto (‘
Mitigation and face activities in Mexico and Spain through phatic
markers’). Valencia: University of Valencia.
Van Rooy, Robert
2003 “
Negative
Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance.”
Journal of
Semantics 201: 239–273.
Viberg, Ake
1983 “
The
Verbs of Perception: A Typological
Study.”
Linguistics 211: 123–162.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1987 English
Speech Act Verbs. A Semantic
Dictionary. London: Academic Press.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Carvalho, Paula, Danielle Caled, Cláudia Silva, Fernando Batista & Ricardo Ribeiro
Linares-Bernabéu, Esther
2023.
Mediating through question-asking: A sociopragmatic analysis of epistemic stance negotiation in everyday conversation.
Journal of Pragmatics 213
► pp. 49 ff.
Silva, Cláudia & Paula Carvalho
2023.
When Can Compliments and Humour Be Considered Hate Speech? A Perspective From Target Groups in Portugal.
Comunicação e Sociedade 43
► pp. e023006 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.