Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Online-First ArticlesStuck between group and transgression
An analysis of the strategic utilization of stance to navigate in-group condemnations
This study examines how politicians navigate the challenge of publicly condemning transgressions committed by
members of their in-group. Examining ten transgressions committed by Israeli political actors which attracted public attention,
the study engages in a discourse analysis of politicians’ posts, illustrating eight discursive strategies for coping with this
challenge. It utilizes Du Bois’ stance triangle to illustrate how politicians navigate conflicting affiliations to their in-group
and to public values. While certain types of in-group condemnations illustrate an adherence to public values at the expense of
group cohesion, other types of downgraded condemnations demonstrate how group affiliation trumps value-affiliation. The study
illustrates that the prevalence of downgraded in-group condemnations is indicative of extreme polarization at the expense of
“statism”–an increasing trend in Israel in recent years.
Keywords: condemnation, stance, evaluation, positioning, alignment, speech acts
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Stancetaking and condemnations
- 1.2The complexity of stancetaking in in-group condemnation
- 1.3X as platform for political speech acts
- 1.4Research purpose
- 1.5Case study
- 2.Method
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1Direct condemnation
- 3.1.1Unequivocal condemnation
- 3.1.2Unacceptable acts
- 3.2Adopting an instrumental perspective
- 3.2.1Prevents the security forces from doing their jobs
- 3.2.2Gift to opponents
- 3.3Adopting a responsibility discourse
- 3.3.1Elected officials have a responsibility
- 3.3.2Using the transgression as a “teachable moment”
- 3.4Distinction between illegitimate words and legitimate ideology
- 3.4.1Arguing the distinction between words and ideology
- 3.4.2Enacting that ideology properly
- 3.5Focusing on the transgressor’s route to self-correction
- 3.5.1The process that the transgressor should take
- 3.5.2Direct call to the transgressor to apologize
- 3.5.3The transgressor apologized
- 3.6Attempts to minimize the transgression
- 3.6.1Euphemization
- 3.6.2Bothsidesism
- 3.6.3Bigger elsewhere
- 3.7Alignment with or distancing from the transgressors or victims
- 3.7.1Standing with the victims
- 3.7.2Disagree with the victim on everything, but…
- 3.7.3Statement of proximity with transgressor
- 3.7.4Disassociation with the transgressor
- 3.7.5Not who we are
- 3.1Direct condemnation
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgment
- Notes
-
References
References (51)
Aitchison, Guy, and Saladin Meckled-Garcia. 2021. “Against
Online Public Shaming: Ethical Problems with Mass Social Media.” Social Theory and
Practice 47(1): 1–31. 

Bachner, Michael. 2023. “Top
Rabbi Calls Gay Knesset Speaker Ohana ‘Infected,’ Blames Him for Meron Disaster.” Times of
Israel, January 1.
Bareli, Avi, and Nir Kedar. 2011. Israeli
Republicanism. Policy Paper
87. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.
Bavelas, Janet, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil, and Jennifer Mullett. 1990. Equivocal
Communication. London: Sage.
Benoit, William L. 1997. “Image Repair Discourse and
Crisis Communication.” Public Relations
Review 23(2): 177–186. 

Breiner, Josh. 2023. “Netanyahu
Says Incitement Spiking After Ex-Pilot Calls to Kill Dictatorial Leaders on Social
Media.” Haaretz, February 5.
Burnette, Jessie, and Andreea S. Calude. 2022. “Wake
up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1961: 6–23. 

Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schaffner. 2002. “Introduction:
Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political
Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to
Political Discourse, edited by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schaffner, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2000. “Political
Discourse in the News: Democratizing Responsibility or Aestheticizing Politics?” Discourse and
Society 11(3): 293–314. 

Du Bois, John M. 2007. “The Stance
Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation,
Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 138–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 

Elyakim, Nehorai. 2023. “The
Racist Film at the Seminary: Included Stereotypes that Damaged the Place of Humor in
Education.” Walla, April 16.
Fabian, Emanuel. 2022. “Deputy
Minister Assails Settlers at Illegal Outpost as ‘Subhuman,’ Sparking Furor.” Times of
Israel, January 6.
Friedman, Elie, and Dalia Gavriely-Nuri. 2018. Israeli
Discourse and the West Bank: Dialectics of Normalization and Estrangement. New York: Routledge Academic Press.
Friedman, Elie, and Zohar Kampf. 2014. “Politically
Speaking at Home and Abroad: A Typology of Message Gap Strategies.” Discourse &
Society 25(6): 1–19. 

. 2019. “‘To
Thine Own Self be True’: The Perceived Meanings and Functions of Political
Consistency.” Language in
Society 49(1): 89–113. 

Friedman, Elie, Michal Neubauer-Shani, and Paul Scham (eds.). 2023. Polarization
and Consensus-Building in Israel: ‘The Centre Cannot Hold’. New York: Routledge Academic Press. 

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2022. “Moral
Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language &
Communication 841: 61–75. 

. 2024. Pragmatics,
(Im)Politeness, and Intergroup Communication: A Multilayered, Discursive Analysis of Cancel
Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Garfinkel, Harold. 1956. “Conditions
of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” American Journal of
Sociology 61(5): 420–424. 

Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2012. The
Normalization of War in Israeli Discourse, 1967–2008. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
Ghanem, Assad, and Ibrahim Khatib. 2017. “The
Nationalization of The Israeli Ethnocratic Regime and the Palestinian Minority’s Shrinking
Citizenship.” Citizenship
Studies 21(8): 889–902. 

Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 2007. The
Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and
Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an
Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guibernau, Montserrat. 2013. Belonging:
Solidarity and Division in Modern
Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
Hauser, Gerard A. 1999. “Aristotle on Epideictic: The
Formation of Public Morality.” Rhetoric Society
Quarterly 29(1): 5–23. 

Horeck, Tanya and Diane Negra. 2022. “Reconsidering
Television True Crime and Gendered Authority in Allen V. Farrow.” Feminist Media
Studies 22(6): 1564–1569. 

Joffre, Tzvi. 2022. “Otzma
Yehudit Candidate Claims Michaeli ‘Bought Child on
Amazon’.” JPost, October 9.
Kádár, Daniel Z., and Puyu Ning. 2019. “Ritual
Public Humiliation: Using Pragmatics to Model Language Aggression.” Acta Linguistica
Academia 66(2): 189–208. 

Kailash, K. K. 2007. “Middle
Game in Coalition Politics.” Economics and Political
Weekly 42(4): 307–317.
Kampf, Zohar. 2009. “Public
(non-) Apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of
Pragmatics 411: 2267–2270. 

. 2020. “‘Do
you condemn?’ Negotiating Power Relations through (In-) Direct Questions and Answers Design in Ethno-political
Interviews.” In The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, Voices and
Functions, edited by Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar, and Galia Hirsch, 261–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

. 2021. “Political
Speech Acts in Contrast: The Case of Calls to Condemn in News Interviews.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1801: 203–218. 

Kampf, Zohar, and Tamar Katriel. 2017. “Political
Condemnations: Public Speech Acts and the Moralization of
Discourse.” In The Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural
Perspective, edited by Donal Carbaugh, 312–326. New York: Routledge.
Kampf, Zohar, and Nava Lowenheim. 2012. “Rituals
of Apology in the Global Arena.” Security
Dialogue 43(1): 43–60. 

Levinson, Chaim. 2020. “Israeli
Minister Violates Lockdown, Contracts Covid-19 and Tries to Cover it
Up.” Haaretz, October 5.
Manosevitch, Idit, and Elie Friedman. 2021. “Accounting
for Culture in Deliberation through Meta-Discursive Analysis.” Javnost – the
Public 28(4): 407–425. 

Masroor, Farzana, Qintarah N. Khan, Iman Aib, and Zulfigar Ali. 2019. “Polarization
and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians.” Social Media +
Society 5(4). 

McCartney, Paul T. 2004. “American Nationalism and U.S.
Foreign Policy from September 11 to the Iraq War.” Political Science
Quarterly 119(3): 399–423. 

Myers, Greg. 2010. “Stancetaking
and Public Discussion in Blogs.” Critical Discourse
Studies 7(4): 263–275. 

Perterson, Michael B., Rune Slothuus, and Lise Togeby. 2010. “Political
Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation.” The Public Opinion
Quarterly 74(3): 530–550. 

Ravid, Barak. 2023. “Israeli
Settlers Torch Palestinian Homes, Cars after Deadly Attack in West
Bank.” Axios, February 27.
Reichertz, Jo. 2010. “Abduction:
The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory.” Forum: Qualitative Social
Research 11(1): art.
13.
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers. 2018. “Discursive
Deflection: Accusation of ‘Fake News’ and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President
Trump.” Social Media+
Society 4(2): 1–12. 

Scham, Paul. 2023. “The
Great Division: The Fateful Polarization of (Jewish) Israeli Society in the
1980s.” In Polarization and Consensus-Building in Israel: ‘The Centre
Cannot Hold’, edited by Elie Friedman, Michal Neubauer-Shani, M., and Paul Scham, 22–39. New York: Routledge Academic Press. 

Shpigel, Noa. 2021. “Israeli
Minister Admits Ignoring Anonymous Complaints as Army’s Manpower
Chief.” Haaretz, October 10.
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation:
An introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the
Construction of Discourse, edited by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
