Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Online-First Articles

Stuck between group and transgression

An analysis of the strategic utilization of stance to navigate in-group condemnations

ORCID logo | Ashkelon Academic College

This study examines how politicians navigate the challenge of publicly condemning transgressions committed by members of their in-group. Examining ten transgressions committed by Israeli political actors which attracted public attention, the study engages in a discourse analysis of politicians’ posts, illustrating eight discursive strategies for coping with this challenge. It utilizes Du Bois’ stance triangle to illustrate how politicians navigate conflicting affiliations to their in-group and to public values. While certain types of in-group condemnations illustrate an adherence to public values at the expense of group cohesion, other types of downgraded condemnations demonstrate how group affiliation trumps value-affiliation. The study illustrates that the prevalence of downgraded in-group condemnations is indicative of extreme polarization at the expense of “statism”–an increasing trend in Israel in recent years.

Keywords: condemnation, stance, evaluation, positioning, alignment, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Stancetaking and condemnations
    • 1.2The complexity of stancetaking in in-group condemnation
    • 1.3X as platform for political speech acts
    • 1.4Research purpose
    • 1.5Case study
  • 2.Method
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Direct condemnation
      • 3.1.1Unequivocal condemnation
      • 3.1.2Unacceptable acts
    • 3.2Adopting an instrumental perspective
      • 3.2.1Prevents the security forces from doing their jobs
      • 3.2.2Gift to opponents
    • 3.3Adopting a responsibility discourse
      • 3.3.1Elected officials have a responsibility
      • 3.3.2Using the transgression as a “teachable moment”
    • 3.4Distinction between illegitimate words and legitimate ideology
      • 3.4.1Arguing the distinction between words and ideology
      • 3.4.2Enacting that ideology properly
    • 3.5Focusing on the transgressor’s route to self-correction
      • 3.5.1The process that the transgressor should take
      • 3.5.2Direct call to the transgressor to apologize
      • 3.5.3The transgressor apologized
    • 3.6Attempts to minimize the transgression
      • 3.6.1Euphemization
      • 3.6.2Bothsidesism
      • 3.6.3Bigger elsewhere
    • 3.7Alignment with or distancing from the transgressors or victims
      • 3.7.1Standing with the victims
      • 3.7.2Disagree with the victim on everything, but…
      • 3.7.3Statement of proximity with transgressor
      • 3.7.4Disassociation with the transgressor
      • 3.7.5Not who we are
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00108.fri
References (51)
Aitchison, Guy, and Saladin Meckled-Garcia
2021 “Against Online Public Shaming: Ethical Problems with Mass Social Media.” Social Theory and Practice 47(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachner, Michael
2023 “Top Rabbi Calls Gay Knesset Speaker Ohana ‘Infected,’ Blames Him for Meron Disaster.” Times of Israel, January 1.Google Scholar
Bareli, Avi, and Nir Kedar
2011 Israeli Republicanism. Policy Paper 87. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.Google Scholar
Bavelas, Janet, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil, and Jennifer Mullett
1990 Equivocal Communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L.
1997 “Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication.” Public Relations Review 23(2): 177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breiner, Josh
2023 “Netanyahu Says Incitement Spiking After Ex-Pilot Calls to Kill Dictatorial Leaders on Social Media.” Haaretz, February 5.Google Scholar
Burnette, Jessie, and Andreea S. Calude
2022 “Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts.” Journal of Pragmatics 1961: 6–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schaffner
2002 “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, edited by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schaffner, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie
2000 “Political Discourse in the News: Democratizing Responsibility or Aestheticizing Politics?” Discourse and Society 11(3): 293–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John M.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 138–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elyakim, Nehorai
2023 “The Racist Film at the Seminary: Included Stereotypes that Damaged the Place of Humor in Education.” Walla, April 16.Google Scholar
Fabian, Emanuel
2022 “Deputy Minister Assails Settlers at Illegal Outpost as ‘Subhuman,’ Sparking Furor.” Times of Israel, January 6.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elie, and Dalia Gavriely-Nuri
2018 Israeli Discourse and the West Bank: Dialectics of Normalization and Estrangement. New York: Routledge Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elie, and Zohar Kampf
2014 “Politically Speaking at Home and Abroad: A Typology of Message Gap Strategies.” Discourse & Society 25(6): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “ ‘To Thine Own Self be True’: The Perceived Meanings and Functions of Political Consistency.” Language in Society 49(1): 89–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elie, Michal Neubauer-Shani, and Paul Scham
(eds.) 2023 Polarization and Consensus-Building in Israel: ‘The Centre Cannot Hold’. New York: Routledge Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2022 “Moral Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language & Communication 841: 61–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2024 Pragmatics, (Im)Politeness, and Intergroup Communication: A Multilayered, Discursive Analysis of Cancel Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1956 “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology 61(5): 420–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2012 The Normalization of War in Israeli Discourse, 1967–2008. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ghanem, Assad, and Ibrahim Khatib
2017 “The Nationalization of The Israeli Ethnocratic Regime and the Palestinian Minority’s Shrinking Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 21(8): 889–902. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss
2007 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guibernau, Montserrat
2013 Belonging: Solidarity and Division in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hauser, Gerard A.
1999 “Aristotle on Epideictic: The Formation of Public Morality.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 29(1): 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horeck, Tanya and Diane Negra
2022 “Reconsidering Television True Crime and Gendered Authority in Allen V. Farrow.” Feminist Media Studies 22(6): 1564–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joffre, Tzvi
2022 “Otzma Yehudit Candidate Claims Michaeli ‘Bought Child on Amazon’.” JPost, October 9.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., and Puyu Ning
2019 “Ritual Public Humiliation: Using Pragmatics to Model Language Aggression.” Acta Linguistica Academia 66(2): 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kailash, K. K.
2007 “Middle Game in Coalition Politics.” Economics and Political Weekly 42(4): 307–317.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar
2009 “Public (non-) Apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 2267–2270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “ ‘Do you condemn?’ Negotiating Power Relations through (In-) Direct Questions and Answers Design in Ethno-political Interviews.” In The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, Voices and Functions, edited by Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar, and Galia Hirsch, 261–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Political Speech Acts in Contrast: The Case of Calls to Condemn in News Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 1801: 203–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar, and Tamar Katriel
2017 “Political Condemnations: Public Speech Acts and the Moralization of Discourse.” In The Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Donal Carbaugh, 312–326. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar, and Nava Lowenheim
2012 “Rituals of Apology in the Global Arena.” Security Dialogue 43(1): 43–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Chaim
2020 “Israeli Minister Violates Lockdown, Contracts Covid-19 and Tries to Cover it Up.” Haaretz, October 5.Google Scholar
Manosevitch, Idit, and Elie Friedman
2021 “Accounting for Culture in Deliberation through Meta-Discursive Analysis.” Javnost – the Public 28(4): 407–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masroor, Farzana, Qintarah N. Khan, Iman Aib, and Zulfigar Ali
2019 “Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians.” Social Media + Society 5(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCartney, Paul T.
2004 “American Nationalism and U.S. Foreign Policy from September 11 to the Iraq War.” Political Science Quarterly 119(3): 399–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
2010 “Stancetaking and Public Discussion in Blogs.” Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 263–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perterson, Michael B., Rune Slothuus, and Lise Togeby
2010 “Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 74(3): 530–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Barak
2023 “Israeli Settlers Torch Palestinian Homes, Cars after Deadly Attack in West Bank.” Axios, February 27.Google Scholar
Reichertz, Jo
2010 “Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11(1): art. 13.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of ‘Fake News’ and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media+ Society 4(2): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scham, Paul
2023 “The Great Division: The Fateful Polarization of (Jewish) Israeli Society in the 1980s.” In Polarization and Consensus-Building in Israel: ‘The Centre Cannot Hold’, edited by Elie Friedman, Michal Neubauer-Shani, M., and Paul Scham, 22–39. New York: Routledge Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shpigel, Noa
2021 “Israeli Minister Admits Ignoring Anonymous Complaints as Army’s Manpower Chief.” Haaretz, October 10.Google Scholar
Teske, Nathan
1997 Political Activists in America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B.
1990 Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston
2000 “Evaluation: An introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, edited by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TOI staff
2023 “Coalition MK Calls for Arrest Of ‘Treasonous’ Opposition Heads Lapid, Gantz.” Times of Israel, January 10.Google Scholar
Yubovich, Yaniv
2022 “ ‘No Politician to Interfere in Our Decisions,’ Israeli Military Chief Warns Ben-Gvir.” Haaretz, November 30.Google Scholar