Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Online-First Articles

‘You are not empowered, you have neither character nor pride’

Assessing aggressive language against Spanish female politicians in high-profile positions

ORCID logo | Universtitat Politècnica de València , Spain

This paper aims to unveil the most frequent discursive practices of aggressive language addressed at three female Spanish politicians on X (formerly Twitter) and the themes around which these practices revolve. Isabel Díaz-Ayuso, Irene Montero, and Yolanda Díaz were selected for analysis. A mixed-methods analysis of 1,500 randomly retrieved posts was conducted. Aggressive language aimed at delegitimizing the politicians was manually coded based on existing taxonomies. A data-driven taxonomy was obtained with the most frequently involved themes to assess gender-based representations. Quantitative findings pointed to interindividual differences that were qualitatively analyzed. Aggression towards Yolanda Díaz was conveyed through insults and negative comments questioning her intelligence, physical appearance, and political affiliation. Replies to Isabel Díaz-Ayuso questioned the morality of her decisions regarding social issues. At the same time, Irene Montero received more insults and sexist negative comments focusing on her sexuality and subordination to male figures.

Keywords: female politicians, online aggression, gendered representations, X (formerly Twitter)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Politics and aggression against women politicians on social media
  • 3.Research design
    • 3.1Datasets: Procedure for the selection of the politicians and the Spanish political spectrum
    • 3.2Data analysis procedure
    • 3.3The data-driven taxonomy and themes of aggression
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1General results of the quantitative analysis
      • 4.1.1A closer look at discursive strategies of aggression per politician
      • 4.1.2A closer look at themes per politician
    • 4.2Results of the qualitative analysis
      • 4.2.1Posts sent to @IreneMontero
      • 4.2.2Posts sent to @IdiazAyuso: ‘And what is your brother’s percentage commission for this collaboration?’
      • 4.2.3Posts sent to @Yolanda_Diaz: What cool things you do!!!’
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00109.del
References (60)
Albelda, Marta
2022 “¿No te das cuenta de que me estás molestando? Las recriminaciones intensificadas mediante preguntas retóricas”. Oralia 25(2):9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Romain Wacziarg
2000 “The economics of civic trust”. In Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, edited by Susan J. Pharr and and Daniel D. Putnam, 149–172. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Kristin L., and Jill Cermele
2014 “Public/Private Language Aggression against Women: Tweeting Rage and Intimate Partner Violence”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(2):274–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19(3):273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1987 [1955] A Theory of Play and Fantasy: Gregory Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New Jersey/London: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Blanco, Ignacio, Leticia Rodríguez, and Sergio Arce
2022 “Polarización y discurso de odio con sesgo de género asociado a la política: análisis de las interacciones en Twitter”. Revista de Comunicación 21(2):33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boasso, Alyssa, Sarah Covert, and Janet B. Ruscher
2012 “Benevolent Sexist Beliefs Predict Perceptions of Speakers and Recipients of a Term of Endearment.” The Journal of Social Psychology 152(5):533–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(2):226–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2022 “Spider Woman Beats Hulk: Baroness Hale and the Prorogation of Parliament.” In Law, Language and the Courtroom. Legal Linguistics and the Discourse of Judges, edited by Stanislaw Gozdz Roszkowski and Gianluca Pontrandolfo, 69–82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burgen, Stephen
(2023, January 15). “‘We Need to Unite: How Yolanda Díaz is Galvanising the Left in Spain.” The Guardian. [URL]
Burnap, Pete, and Matthew L. Williams
2015 “Cyber Hate Speech on Twitter: An Application of Machine Classification and Statistical Modeling for Policy and Decision Making.” Policy & Internet 7(2): 223–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carretero, Rodrigo
(2023, May 30). “‘Der Spiegel’ rebautiza a Ayuso en el titular de un artículo: es muy difícil decir más con menos”. Huffpost. [URL]
Cejka, Mary Ann, and Alice H. Eagly
1999 “Gender-stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(4):413–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cordella, Marisa
1996 “Confrontational Style in Arguments: Pragmatics and Teaching Outlook.” Language, Culture, and Curriculum 91:148–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 421:3232–3245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Saz Rubio, María Milagros
2023 “Assessing Impoliteness-related Language in Response to a Season’s Greeting Posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 2061:31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dhrodia, Azmina
2018 “Unsocial Media: A Toxic Place for Women.” IPPR Progressive Review 24(4):380–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Wendy Wood
1999 “The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions versus Social Roles.” American Psychologist 541:408–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora, and Sole Alba Zollo
2021 “ ‘How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew’: A Multimodal Critical Discursive Approach to Online Misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1):47–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora, and Ruth Breeze
2022 “Gender and Politics in a Digitalised World: Investigating Online Hostility against UK Female MPs.” Discourse & Society 33(3):303–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Final report of the Broadband Commission Working Group on Gender
, September 2015 Combatting Online Violence against Women & Girls: A Worldwide Wake-up Call.Google Scholar
Freelon, Deen, and David Karpf
2015 “Of big birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter Interactivity in the 2012 Presidential Debates.” Information, Communication & Society 18(4):390–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frenda, Simona, Ghanem, Bilal, and Manuel Montes-y-Gómez
2018 “Exploration of Misogyny in Spanish and English Tweets.” In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Language (IberEval 2018), 260–267.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Tamara, and Fabian Schäfer
2020 “Normalizing Misogyny: Hate Speech and Verbal Abuse of Female Politicians on Japanese Twitter”. Japan Forum 33(4):553–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, Catalina, and Ester Brenes
2022 “La formulación del insulto: variantes del discurso parlamentario”. Revista Signos: Estudios De Lingüística 55(108):61–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2021 “Morality in Sociopragmatics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, edited by Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 385-407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1956 “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology 61(5):420–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Maria Vasilaki
2018 “The Personal and/as the Political: Small Stories and Impoliteness in Online Discussions of the Greek Crisis.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2):215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gulati, Jeff, and Christine B. Williams
2010 “Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress.” (available at [URL]).
Hardaker, Claire
2013 ‘What is turning so many young men into trolls?’ The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL] [7th April 2021].
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
2016 “ ‘Real Men Don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911:80–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HateAid: Poll on digital violence
2022 [URL]Google Scholar
Himelboim, Tim, Stephen McCreery and Marc Smith
2013 “Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 181:154–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leoni, and Nayda Terkildsen
1993 “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 461:503–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez Reiter
2015 “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2):239–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim F.
1996 The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonara Esposito
2018 “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-based Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14(1):45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koleva, Ruth
(2021, July 22). “Inspiring Thursday: Irene Montero”. Women against Violence Europe. [URL]
Krook, Mona L.
2020 Violence against Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Priya, Anatoly Gruzd, and Philip Mai
2021 “Mapping out Violence against Women of Influence on Twitter Using the Cyber-Lifestyle Routine Activity Theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 65(5):689–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwak, Haewoon, Jeremy Blackburn, and Seungyeop Han
2015 “Exploring Cyberbullying and Other Toxic Behavior in Team Competition Online Games.” [URL]. DOI logo
Lakoff, George
2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. Vermont: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Lavezzolo, Sebastián
2017 “¿Por qué podemos y ciudadanos se vetan mutuamente?” El Diario, 14th June [URL]Google Scholar
Lewis, Ruth, Michael Rowe, and Clare Wiper
2016 “Online Abuse of Feminists as an Emerging Form of Violence against Women and Girls.” The British Journal of Criminology 57(6):1462–1481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Tae-Seop, and John Waite Bowers
1991 “Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact”. Human Communication Research 17(3):415–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manne, Kate
2017 ‘Down Girl’: The Logic of Mysogyny. Oxfrod: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha
2010 “Objectification and Internet Misogyny.” In The Offensive Internet, edited by Saul Levmore and Martha C. Nussbaum, 68–87. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi
2004 “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6(2):259–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piñeiro, Teresa, and Xabier Martínez
2021 “Eso no me lo dices en la calle. Análisis del discurso del odio contra las mujeres en Twitter”. Profesional De La Información 30(5):1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasulo, Margaret
2021 “Are Gold Hoop Earrings and a Dab of Red Lipstick enough to Get even Democrats on the Offensive? The Case of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1):155–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rheault, Ludovic, Erica Rayment, and Andreea Musulan
2019 “Politicians in the Line of Fire: Incivility and the Treatment of Women on Social Media.” Research and Politics, January-March: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump”. Social Media+ Society 4(2):1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shantz, Carolyn U., and Willard W. Hartup
1992 Conflict in Child and Adolescent Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale
1980 Man-made Language. Boston and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Teneketzi, Korallia
2022 “Impoliteness across Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Study of Conflict on YouTube and Reddit.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10(1):38–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unión Interparlamentaria
2018 “Sexism, Harassment and Violence against Women in Parliaments in Europe.” ipu.org. [URL]
Van der Pas, Daphne J., and Loes Aaldering
2020 “Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Metaanalysis.” Journal of Communication 70(1):114–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vogels, Emily A.
2021 “The State of Online Harassment.” Pew Research Center 13 January. [URL]
Wolfson, Nessa, and Joan Manes
1980 “ ‘Don’t dear me!’ In Women and Language in Literature and Society, edited by Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman, 79–92. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar