Article In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Online-First Articles

Contesting spaces

An examination of the prepositional phrases v/na Ukraine and iz/s Ukraine in Russian X discourse

ORCID logo | Oklahoma State University, USA
ORCID logo | Southeastern Oklahoma State University, USA
In this study, we investigate the use of two pairs of Russian prepositions—v/na (‘in/on’) and iz/s (‘from’) with the noun Ukraine in X discourse. Since Ukrainian independence in 1991, v Ukraine and iz Ukraine have been used to indicate Ukrainian sovereignty and na and s used as their unmarked counterparts as defined by Russian linguistic tradition. Using a web-based set of tools called TWIG, we examine how posts containing the prepositional phrases construct stances toward the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Specifically, we examine the frequency of the prepositional phrases, their collocations, and the semantics conveyed by the collocational patterns. Our findings show notable differences in the collocational patterns of posts using v Ukraine versus na Ukraine. Analysis of these collocations suggests that posts using v Ukraine have a proximation effect to the conflict, while those using na Ukraine have a distancing effect.
Keywords: conflict, social media discourse, stance, prepositions, X
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Russian-Ukrainian language conflict
    • 2.1Prepositions v/na and iz/s
  • 3.X
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Theoretical framework
    • 4.2Procedure
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Frequency
    • 5.2Collocation
      • 5.2.1Prepositions v/na (location) collocation analysis
      • 5.2.2Prepositions v/na (direction) collocation analysis
      • 5.2.3Prepositions iz/s (genitive) collocation analysis
    • 5.3Semantic prosody and stance
      • 5.3.1Proximal positioning
      • 5.3.2Distance positioning
      • 5.3.3Temporal positioning
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (62)
References
Ali, Marwah K., Anne Althea Christopher, and Munif Z. F. B. Nordin. 2017. “Pronouns and Ideology in Newspaper Discourse.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 6(3): 168–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilaniuk, Laada. 2017. “Purism and Pluralism: Language Use Trends in Popular Culture in Ukraine since Independence.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 35(1): 293–309.Google Scholar
Biri, Ylva. 2023. “Affective Stance as Positioning in an English-speaking Online Fan Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 2151: 70–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogetić, Ksenija. 2013. “Normal Straight Gays: Lexical Collocations and Ideologies of Masculinity in Personal Ads of Serbian Gay Teenagers.” Gender and Language 7(3): 333–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnette, Jessie, and Andreea S. Calude. 2022. “Wake Up New Zealand! Directives, Politeness and Stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ Posts.” Journal of Pragmatics 1961: 6–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2008. “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40(1): 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caprolu, Maurantonio, Alireza Sadighian, and Roberto Di Pietro. 2023. “Characterizing the 2022-Russo-Ukrainian Conflict through the Lenses of Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: Dataset, Methodology, and Key Findings.” 32nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Emily, and Emilio Ferrara. 2023. “Posts in Time of Conflict: A Public Dataset Tracking the Twitter Discourse on the War between Ukraine and Russia.” In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 171: 1006–1013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiluwa, Innocent, and Presley Ifukor. 2015. “‘War against our Children’: Stance and Evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls Campaign Discourse on Twitter and Facebook.” Discourse and Society 26(3): 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2019. “Euphemisms and Non-Proximal Manipulation of Discourse Space: The Case of Blue-on-Blue.” Lingua 2251: 50–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CITR Executive Board, Coalition for Independent Technology Research. 2023. Letter: X’s New API Plans Will Devastate Public Interest Research [URL]
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The Social Construction of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devlin, Anne Marie. 2017. “Lard-eaters, Gay-ropeans, Sheeple and Prepositions: Lexical and Syntactic Devices Employed to Position the Other in Russian Online Political Forums.” Russian Journal of Communication 9(1): 53–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enrique-Arias, Andres, and Marina Gomila Albal. 2023. “Testing Twitter Data on a Morphosyntactic Variable: The Expression of the Future in American and Peninsular Spanish.” In Corpus Dialectology, edited by Elissa Pustka, Carmen Quijada Van den Berghe, and Verena Weiland, 176–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas, and Paul Baker. 2008. “Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005.” Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Manuel B., and Armi Cunanan-Yabut. 2022. “Public Sentiment and Emotion Analyses of Twitter Data on the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine.” 9th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE): 242–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geissler, Dominique, Dominik Bär, Nicolas Pröllochs, and Stefan Feuerriegel. 2023. “Russian Propaganda on Social Media during the 2022 Invasion of Ukraine.” EPJ Data Science 12(35). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graber, Kathryn E. 2022. “It’s ‘Ukraine’, not ‘the Ukraine’ — here is why.” The Conversation, March 9.Google Scholar
Grčar, Miha, Darko Cherepnalkoski, Igor Mozetič, and Petra Kralj Novak. 2017. “Stance and Influence of Twitter Users Regarding the Brexit Referendum.” Computational Social Networks 41:6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2022. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Masako Fidler, Václav Cvrček, and Anna Obukhova. 2023. “The Case for Case in Putin’s Speeches.” Russian Linguistics 47(1): 15–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing, Fu. 2020. “Armed Conflicts as a Source of New Formations in the Russian Language (on Material of the Armed Conflict in Donbass).” The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Philology” 871: 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso, and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2020. “The Dynamics of Stance Constructions.” Language Sciences 821: 101330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalyuga, Marika. 2020. Russian Prepositional Phrases: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoblock, Natalia. 2017. “Xenophobic Trumpeters: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of Donald Trump’s Facebook Conversations.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(2): 295–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2020. Language of Conflict: Discourses of the Ukrainian Crisis. New York: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2022. The Grammar of Hate: Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolomiyets, Lada. 2020. “Manipulative Mistranslations in Official Documents and Media Discourses on Contemporary Ukraine.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 37(3): 367–406.Google Scholar
Kompaniiets, Olesia. 2017. “A Preposition as a Marker of Identity: Ukraine Case.” White Paper on the Key Role of Human Geography, Culture and Language in Effective Communication. A Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA), Periodic Publication: 22–26.Google Scholar
Koschalka, Ben. 2022. “War in Ukraine Revives Linguistic Debate in Poland over how to Say ‘in Ukraine’”. Notes from Poland, March 4.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire. 2020. Language as Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranert, Michael. 2017. “‘Today I Offer you, and we Offer the Country a New Vision’: The Strategic Use of First Person Pronouns in Party Conference Speeches of the Third Way.” Discourse & Society 28(2): 182–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krivoruchko, Julia. 2008. “Prepositional Wars: When Ideology Defines Prepositions”. In Adpositions: Pragmatic, Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives, edited by Dennis Kurzon, and Silvia Adler, 191–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. 1998. “Ukraine: Coming to Terms with the Soviet Legacy.” The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 14(4): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Daria. 2023. “Broadcasting Messages via Telegram: Pro-Government Social Media Control During the 2020 Protests in Belarus and 2022 Anti-War Protests in Russia.” Political Communication: 1–22.Google Scholar
Lapychak, Chrystyna. 1991. “Over 90% Vote Yes in Referendum; Kravchuk Elected President of Ukraine.” The Ukrainian Weekly (49).Google Scholar
Louw, Bill. 1993. “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.” In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, edited by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 157–176. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Kristen, and Jeremy P. Fyke. 2014. “Euphemisms and Ethics: A Language-Centered Analysis of Penn State’s Sexual Abuse Scandal.” Journal of Business Ethics 122(4): 551–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makhortykh, Mykola, and Yehor Lyebyedyev. 2015. “# SaveDonbassPeople: Twitter, Propaganda, and Conflict in Eastern Ukraine.” The Communication Review 18(4): 239–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellon, Jonathan, and Christopher Prosser. 2017. “Twitter and Facebook are not Representative of the General Population: Political Attitudes and Demographics of British Social Media Users.” Research and Politics 4(3): 053168017720008. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2020. “Greece, the Netherlands and (the) Ukraine: A Corpus-based Study of Definite Article Use with Country Names.” Names 68(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2004. “‘Utterly Content in Each Other’s Company’: Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 131–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Evaluative Prosody.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, edited by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 279–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily I-Wen Su. 2011. “The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse—American Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(13): 3251–3266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redmon, Robert. 2022. On the Development of a Twig: a Suite of Tools for the Analysis of Discourse on Twitter. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Rumyantsev, Oleg. 2019. “Tra Grammatica e Politica: L’uso delle Preposizioni v е na Davanti al Termine Ucraina.” EURASIATICA 141: 95–108.Google Scholar
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Sofie Decock, and Ilse Depraetere. 2023. “The Impact of Linguistic Choices and (Para-)Linguistic Markers on the Perception of Twitter Complaints by Other Customers: An Experimental Approach.” Journal of Politeness Research 19(1): 87–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabatovych, Iana. 2019. “Do Social Media Create Revolutions? Using Twitter Sentiment Analysis for Predicting the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine.” Global Media and Communication 15(3): 275–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salama, Amir Hamza Youssef. 2011. Ideological Collocation in Meta-Wahhabi Discourse Post-911: A Symbiosis of Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University.
Scott, Kate. 2015. “The Pragmatics of Hashtags: Inference and Conversational Style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 811: 8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, and Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solopova, Veronika, Christoph Benzmüller, and Tim Landgraf. 2023. “The Evolution of Pro-Kremlin Propaganda from a Machine Learning and Linguistics Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Second Ukrainian Natural Language Processing Workshop (UNLP): 40–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steblyna, Nataliia. 2020. “Selling Insecurity via Twitter: Ukrainian President’s Posts and Modern Political Discourse.” Przegląd Strategiczny 10(13): 317–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1995. “Collocations and Semantic Profiles: On the Cause of the Trouble with Quantitative Studies.” Functions of Language 2(1): 23–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte. 2020. “Representing the Windrush Generation: Metaphor in Discourses Then and Now.” Critical Discourse Studies 17(1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, Dror, Yotam Ophir, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2020. “Russian Twitter Accounts and the Partisan Polarization of Vaccine Discourse, 2015–2017.” American Journal of Public Health 110(5): 718–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanner, Catherine. 2014. “‘Fraternal’ Nations and Challenges to Sovereignty in Ukraine: The Politics of Linguistic and Religious Ties.” American Ethnologist 41(3): 427–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. “Enacting Identity in Microblogging through Ambient Affiliation.” Discourse and Communication 8(2): 209–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zia, Haris Bin, Ehsan Ul Haq, Ignacio Castro, Pan Hui, and Gareth Tyson. 2023. “An Analysis of Twitter Discourse on the War Between Russia and Ukraine.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11390.Google Scholar