Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.1–35

Heckling — A mimetic-interpersonal perspective

The present paper aims to model the interactional operation of heckling, which has received little attention in impoliteness and interaction studies, despite the fact that studying this phenomenon has various advantages for the analyst. In order to fill this knowledge gap, I approach heckling by combining Turner’s (1982) anthropological framework with my interaction-based relational ritual theory (e.g. Kádár 2012, 2013; Kádár and Bax 2013). Following Turner, I define heckling as a ‘social drama’, which is evaluated by its watchers as ‘judges’. In accordance with my relational ritual framework I argue that heckling is a mimetic ritualistic mini-performance, which is inherently interactional as it operates in the adjacent action pair of the heckler’s performance and the public speaker/performer’s counter-performance. Adopting Turner’s terminology, heckling is a ritualistic performance of ‘anti-structure’, i.e. it upsets the regular social — and consequently interactional — structure of a setting. Successful counter-performance is a ritual of ‘structure’, which restores the normal social structure of the event, as the public speaker/performer regains control over the interaction. Through the social actions of performance and counter-performance the heckled and the heckler aim to affiliate themselves with the audience, who are ‘metaparticipants’ of the ritualistic interaction, and with the watchers/listeners in the case of video/audio-recorded interactions, who can be defined as ‘lay observers’ (cf. Kádár and Haugh 2013). Approaching heckling as a theatrical type of relational ritual helps us capture various complexities of this phenomenon, such as its relationship with certain interactional settings and metaparticipant expectations/evaluations, and its interface with related phenomena such as impoliteness.

Keywords: (dis)affiliation, ritual, heckling, aggression, disruption, interruption
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 21 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.1.01kad
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C
2004 “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy.” Sociological Theory 22(4):527–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B
2010 “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 421:2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Michael J
1999 Argumentation and Constructive Interaction. In Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing, edited by Pierre Coirier and Jerry Andriessen, 179–202. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
2000 “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts).” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10/11):1453–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bax, Marcel
2010 Rituals. In Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 8: Historical Pragmatics, edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 483–519. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baxter, Judith
2002 “Competing Discourses in the Classroom: A Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis of Girls’ and Boys’ Speech in Public Contexts.” Language in Society 13(6):827–842.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M., and Tomoko Takahashi
1989 Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-Threatening Speech Acts. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in School Language Variation, edited by Miriam R. Eisenstein, 199–218. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Adrian
1981 “Interruptions and the Interpretation of Conversation.” Discourse Processes 4(2):171–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Douglas, and Peggy Wright Nash
2005 Essentials of Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Björkman, Beyza
2011 “Pragmatic Strategies in English as an Academic Lingua Franca: Ways of Achieving Communicative Effectiveness?” Journal of Pragmatics 43(4):950–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bond, Peter
2013 Off-side. Keynote talk presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 13.Google Scholar
Borden, R.J
1980 Audience Influence. In Psychology of Group Influence, edited by P.B. Paulus, 91–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruff, Ian
2013 The Materiality of the Body and the Viscerality of Protest. Keynote talk presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 13.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2010 “Face, Facework and Political Discourse.” Revue internationale de psychologie sociale23 (2/3):155–183.Google Scholar
Chapman, Dennis
1948 “The Combination of Hecklers in the East of Scotland, 1822 and 1827.” The Scottish Historical Review 27(104):156–164.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H
2006 “Pragmatics of Language Performance.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence L. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 365–382. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(2):349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1999 “The Emergence of Thought.” Erkenntnis 51(1):511–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Arthur A
1958 “Speech Blocks – How to Deal with Them.” Today’s Speech 6(3):13–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Own M
1986 “Free Speech and Social Structure.” [Online] Faculty Scholarship Series. Available at: [URL], accessed on May 22, 2013.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The ‘Culture Wars’.” Journal of Politeness Research 5(2):273–303.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
1974 Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1986 “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 62(1-2):29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grush, Joseph E
1978 “Audience can Inhibit or Facilitate Aggressive Behaviour.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4(1):119–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haberkorn, Gideon
2009 The Muppets as a Metaphor for the Self . In Kermit Culture: Critical Perspectives in Jim Henson’s Muppets, edited by Jennifer C. Garlen and Anissa M. Graham, 25–39. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Disentangling Face, Facework and Im/Politeness.” Sociocultural Pragmatics 1(1):46–73.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Mark
1991 “Restructuring, Reconstruction, Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical Interaction Theory”. Millenium 20(2):169–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H
1983 Essays in the History of Linguistic Anthropology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Madelene E
1941 “Teaching Students to Teach.” The American Journal of Nursing 41(10):1189–1192.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
1982 The Rhetoric of Witnessing and Heckling: A Case Study in Ethnorhetoric. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson
1993 Failures in Higher Order Conditions in the Organization of Witnessing and Heckling Episodes. In Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Scott Jacobs, and Sally Jackson, 140–169. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Mel
2011 “Heckle, Hiss, Howl and Holler.” Arts & The Public Sphere 1(2):117–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Mel, and Lee Campbell
2013 Heckler: Tactics How to Heckle, Hiss, Howl and Holler. [online] Available at: [URL].Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z
2011 “A Graphic-Semiotic Analysis of the Chinese Multimodal Elevation and Denigration Phenomenon.” US-China Foreign Language 9(2):77–88.Google Scholar
2012 Relational ritual. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–48. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. Ritual Notions in Cross-Cultural Contact: A Case Study of Heckling.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Marcel Bax
2013 “In-Group Ritual and Relational Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 581:73–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
1997 “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language 4(2):251–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kochman, Thomas
1983 “The Boundary Between Play and Nonplay in Black Verbal Duelling.” Language in Society 12(3):329–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korey Lefteroff, Lindsay M
2005 “Excessive Heckling and Violent Behaviour at Sporting Events: A Legal Solution?” University of Miami Business Law Review 1191:134–135.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
2003 “Ritual Performance and the Politics of Identity. On the Functions and Uses of Ritual.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4(2):211–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul
1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Discourse.” Language in Society 271:27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikhaylova, Yevgeniya
2011 “Does Copyright Law Sit Down on Stand-up Comedy?” St . John’s Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Journal 1(31):41–57.Google Scholar
Miles, Tim
2013 ‘I’m Kirk Douglas’ Son’: A Phenomenological Model of the Role of the Heckler in Stand-up Comedy. Paper presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 13.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal
1987 “Functions of Repetition in Conversation.” Text 7(3):245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pashler, Harold E
1999 The Psychology of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, Giovanni, Martin V. Butz, Olivier Sigaud, and Gianluca Baldassarre
2009 Anticipatory Behaviour in Adaptive Learning Systems: From Psychological Theories to Artificial Cognitive System. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Planken, Brigitte
2005 “Managing Rapport in Lingua Franca Sales Negotiations: A Comparison of Professional and Aspiring Negotiators.” English for Specific Purposes 24(4):381–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, Sameer
2011 “Joke’s on You!”: Stand-up Comedy Performance and the Management of Hecklers. Masters thesis, [online] Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Rutter, Jason
2000 “The Stand-up Introduction Sequence: Comparing Comedy Compères.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(4):463–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1999 “Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(4):405–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1984 “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language and Society 13(3):311–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverthorne, Collin P., and Lee Mazmanian
1975 “The Effects of Heckling and Media of Presentation on the Impact of a Persuasive Communication.” The Journal of Social Psychology 96(2):229–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sonia
2006 Where Do Hecklers Come From? The Origins of Booing. [online] Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J
1999 “Genres of Discourse and the Definition of Literature.” Discourse Processes 28(2):109–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1):31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stopfner, Maria
2013 Streitkultur im Parlament. Linguistische Analyse der Zwischenrufe im österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Templin, Charlotte
1999 “Hillary Clinton as Threat to Gender Norms: Cartoon Images of the First Lady.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 23(1):20–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna
2002 Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph H
2001 Role Theory. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan H. Turner, 233–254. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor
1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New Brunswick and London: Transactions.Google Scholar
1982 From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Ware, Dale P., and Raymond K. Tucker
1974 “Heckling as Distraction: An Experimental Study of its Effect on Source Credibility.” Speech Monographs 41(2):185–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Linguistic Politeness Theory and Its Aftermath: Recent Research Trails. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage Graham Lambert, 43–70. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wood, Linda A., and Rolf O. Kroger
2000 Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zeman, Zbynĕk
1984 Heckling Hitler: Caricatures of the Third Reich. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2019. Everyday incivility and the urban interaction order. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Janicki, Karol
2017. What is conflict? What is aggression? Are these challenging questions?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5:1 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Kadar, Daniel Z., Puyu Ning & Yongping Ran
2018. Public ritual apology – A case study of Chinese. Discourse, Context & Media 26 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Siân Robinson Davies
2016. Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Melvin de la Cruz
2016. Rituals of outspokenness and verbal conflict. Pragmatics and Society 7:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Fengguang Liu & Juliane House
2020. (Im)Politeness and Chinese political discourse – An introduction. Discourse, Context & Media 35 ► pp. 100384 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Yongping Ran
2015. Ritual in intercultural contact: A metapragmatic case study of heckling. Journal of Pragmatics 77 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Sen Zhang
2019. Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 698 ff. DOI logo
Li, Jie & Xinren Chen
2022. The performance and relational role of toast intervention in Chinese dining contexts. Pragmatics and Society 13:4 ► pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2022. Review of Kádár (2017): Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina & Dániel Z. Kádár
2017. Convention and Ritual (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.