Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes
Antonio Bova | Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Francesco Arcidiacono | Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
This paper sets out to investigate the issues leading parents to engage in argumentative discussions with their children during mealtimes. Within a data corpus of 30 video-recorded meals of 10 middle to upper-middle-class Swiss and Italian families with a high socio-cultural level, 107 argumentative discussions between parents and children aged from 3 to 9 years old were selected. The approach for the analysis is based on the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion. The results show that family argumentative discussions unfold around issues that are generated both by parental prescriptions and by children’s requests. The parental prescriptions largely concern context-bound activities such as having to eat a certain food or the teaching of correct table manners. The issues triggered by children’s requests refer to a wide range of activities, mainly related to the activity of mealtimes but also related to the children’s behavior outside the family context. These results indicate that argumentative interactions between parents and children are not mere conflictual episodes that must be avoided, but they essentially have a broader educational function.
2007Conflitti e Interazione in Famiglia. Rome: Carocci.
Arcidiacono, Francesco
2008 “Les Interactions Asymétriques en Famille: Analyse Qualitative du Conflit Verbal dans les Conversations à Table.” Cahiers de Psychologie 431:33–41.
Arcidiacono, Francesco
2009 “Conflitti Verbali in Famiglie con Preadolescenti: Modelli di Analisi in Chiave Conversazionale.” Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 36(4):821–841.
Arcidiacono, Francesco
2011 “ ‘But who said that you eat when you want and what you want?’ Verbal Conflicts at Dinnertime and Strategic Moves among Family Members.” In Family Conflicts: Psychological, Social and Medical Implications, edited by James P. Flanagan and Alexander M. Munos, 27–52. New York NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Arcidiacono, Francesco
2013 “Conversation in Educational Contexts: School at Home and Home at School.” In Crossing Boundaries: Intercontextual Dynamics between Family and School, edited by Giuseppina Marsico, Koji Komatsu and Antonio Iannaccone, 83–107. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.
Arcidiacono, Francesco
2014 “Argumentation and Reflexivity.” In The Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 6: Reflexivity and Change in Psychology, edited by Giuseppina Marsico, Ruggero Ruggieri and Sergio Salvatore. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova
2011 “Argumentative Strategies for Conflict Management and Resolution in Italian and Swiss Families.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 301:1385–1389.
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova
2015 “Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives during mealtime conversations: Differences and similarities in children of 3-5 and 6-9 years old.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 61:40–55.
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Clotilde Pontecorvo
2009 “Cultural Practices in Italian Family Conversations: Verbal Conflict between Parents and Preadolescents.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 24(1):97–117.
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Clotilde Pontecorvo
2010 “The Discursive Construction of the Fathers’ Positioning within Family Participation Frameworks.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 25(4):449–472.
Arcidiacono, Francesco, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2009 “Family Conversations: The Relevance of Context in Evaluating Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9(2):79–92.
Aronsson, Karin, and Lucas Gottzén
2011 “Generational Positions at a Family Dinner: Food Morality and Social Order.” Language in Society 40(4):405–426.
1993 “ ‘You gotta know how to tell a story’: Telling, Tales, and Tellers in American and Israeli Narrative Events at Dinner.” Language 22(3):361–402.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1994 “The Dynamics of Family Dinner Talk: Cultural Contexts for Children’s Passages to Adult Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 27(1):1–50.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1997Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
2008 “Language socialization and family dinnertime discourse.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol. 8: Language Socialization, edited by Patricia A. Duff and Nancy H. Hornberger, 87–99. New York NY: Springer Science.
Bousfield, Derek
2013 “Face in Conflict.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1):37–57.
2013a “Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 23(3):206–224.
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2013b “Investigating Children’s Why-Questions. A Study Comparing Argumentative and Explanatory Function.” Discourse Studies 15(6):713–734.
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2014a “ ‘You must eat the salad because it is nutritious’: Argumentative Strategies Adopted by Parents and Children in Food-Related Discussions at Mealtimes.” Appetite 73(1):81–94.
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2014b “Types of Arguments in Parents-Children Discussions: An Argumentative Analysis.” Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 14(1):43–66.
Brumark, Åsa
2008 “ ‘Eat your Hamburger!’ - ‘No, I don’t Want to!’ Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families.” Argumentation 22(2):251–271.
Collins, Willard A., and Brett Laursen
1992 “The Social Structure of Early Conflict: Interaction, Relationships, and Alliance.” In Conflict in Child and Adolescent Development, edited by Carolyn U. Shantz, and Willard W. Hartup, 216–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunn, Judy, and Penny Munn
1987 “Development of Justification in Disputes with Mother and Sibling.” Developmental Psychology 23(6):791–798.
2002 “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam/Newport News VA: Sic Sat/Vale Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M., and Amy A. Strage
1985 “Parent-Child Discourse.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 67–77. New York NY: Academic Press.
Farris, Catherine
2000 “Cross-Sex Peer Conflict and the Discursive Production of Gender in a Chinese Preschool in Taiwan.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(5):539–568.
Fiese, Barbara H., Kimberly P. Foley, and Mary Spagnola
2006 “Routine and Ritual Elements in Family Mealtimes: Contexts for Child Well-Being and Family Identity.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1111:67–89.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im/politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics 2(1):46–94.
Garssen, Bart
2001 “Argument schemes.” In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, 81–99. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Goodwin, Charles
2006 “Retrospective and Prospective Orientation in the Construction of Argumentative Moves.” Text & Talk 26(4-5):443–461.
Goodwin, Charles
2007 “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18(1):53–73.
Goodwin, Marjorie H
2007 “Occasioned Knowledge Exploration in Family Interaction.” Discourse & Society 18(1):93–110.
Gordon, Cynthia
2008 “A(p)parent Play: Blending Frames and Reframing in Family Talk.” Language in Society 37(3):319–349.
2001 “Questions and Strategic Orientation in Verbal Conflict Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(12):1815–1857.
Hartup, Willard W., and Brett Laursen
1993 “Conflict and Context in Peer Relations.” In Children on Playgrounds: Research Perspectives and Applications, edited by Craig H. Hart, 44–48. New York NY: Albans.
Hartup, Willard W., Brett Laursen, Mark I. Stewart, and Amy Eastenson
1998 “Conflict and Friendship Relations of Young Children.” Child Development 59(6):1590–1600.
Hester, Stephen, and Sally Hester
2010 “Conversational Actions and Category Relations: An Analysis of a Children’s Argument.” Discourse Studies 12(1):33–48.
Honess, Terry M., Elizabeth A. Charman, Bruna Zani, Elvira Cicognani, M. Lucia Xerri, Sandy E. Jackson, and Harke A. Bosma
1997 “Conflict between Parents and Adolescents: Variation by Family Constitution.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 15(3):367–385.
Kendall, Shari
(2008) “The Balancing Act: Framing Gendered Parental Identities at Dinnertime.” Language in Society 37(4):539–568.
Kyratzis, Amy, and Guo, Jiansheng
2001 “Preschool Girls’ and Boys’ Verbal Conflict Strategies in the United States and China.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 34(1):45–74.
Larson, Reed W., Kathryn R. Branscomb, and Angela R. Wiley
2006 “Forms and Functions of Family Mealtimes: Multidisciplinary Perspectives.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1111:1–15.
Laurier, Eric, and Sally Wiggins
2011 “Finishing the Family Meal. The Interactional Organisation of Satiety.” Appetite 56(1):53–64.
Liberati, Vivian, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2005 “Voci in Conflitto: L’uso di Voci Diverse nelle Dispute tra Genitori e Figli.” Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 5(1-2):87–108.
2013Fast-Forward Family. Home, Work, and Relationships in Middle-Class America. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Ochs, Elinor, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Alessandra Fasulo
1996 “Socializing Taste.” Ethnos 61(1-2):7–46.
Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi B. Schieffelin
2011 “The Theory of Language Socialization.” In The Handbook of Language Socialization, edited by Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs and Bambi B. Schieffelin, 1–21. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ochs, Elinor, and Meray Shohet
2006 “The Cultural Structuring of Mealtime Socialization.” In Family Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization, edited by Reed W. Larson, Angela R. Wiley and Kathryn R. Branscomb, 35–50. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor
1992 “Science at Dinner.” In Text and Context: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Language Study, edited by Claire J. Kramsch and Sally McConnell-Ginet, 29–45. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath.
Pan, Barbara A., Rivka Y. Perlmann, and Catherine E. Snow
2000 “Food for Thought: Dinner Table as a Context for Observing Parent-Child Discourse.” In Methods for Studying Language Production, edited by Lise Menn and Nan B. Ratner, 205–224. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Pontecorvo, Clotilde
1987 “Discussing for Reasoning: The Role of Argument in Knowledge Construction.” In Learning and Instruction, edited by Erik De Corte, Hans G. Lodewijks, Richard J. Parmentier and Pieter Span, 71–82. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2007Famiglie all’Italiana. Parlare a Tavola. Milan: Cortina.
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2010 “Development of Reasoning through Arguing in Young Children.” Культурно-Историческая Психология / Cultural-Historical Psychology 41:19–29.
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Alessandra Fasulo
1997 “Learning to Argue in Family Shared Discourse: The Reconstruction of Past Events.” In Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, edited by Lauren B. Resnick, Roger Saljo, Clotilde Pontecorvo and Barbara Burge, 406–442. New York NY: Springer.
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Alessandra Fasulo, and Laura Sterponi
2001 “Mutual Apprentices: Making of Parenthood and Childhood in Family Dinner Conversations.” Human Development 44(6):340–361.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2010 “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24(4):489–512.
Slomkowski, Cheryl L., and Judy Dunn
1992 “Arguments and Relationships within the Family: Differences in Young Children’s Disputes with Mother and Sibling.” Developmental Psychology 28(5):919–924.
Tannen, Deborah
2006 “Intertextuality in Interaction: Reframing Family Arguments in Public and Private.” Text & Talk 26(4-5):597–617.
Tafoya, Melissa A., and Mark A. Hamilton
2012 “Relational Dynamics and the Expression of Aggression and Comforting between Siblings.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(1):49–74.
Vuchinich, Samuel
1987 “Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts.” Journal of Marriage and Family 49(3):591–601.
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, Sally
2002 “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory Mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3):311–336.
Wiggins, Sally
2004 “Talking about Taste: Using a Discursive Psychological Approach to Examine Challenges to Food Evaluations.” Appetite 43(1):29–38.
Wiggins, Sally
2013 “The Social Life of ‘Eugh’: Disgust as Assessment in Family Mealtimes.” British Journal of Social Psychology 52(3):489–509.
Wiggins, Sally, and Jonathan Potter
2003“Attitudes and Evaluative Practices: Category vs. Item and Subjective vs. Objective Constructions in Everyday Food Assessments.” British Journal of Social Psychology 42(4):513–531.
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
Arcidiacono, Francesco
2016. Collaborative Relationships Among Couples: Frames of Interaction During Everyday Household Activities. Psychology of Language and Communication 20:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Arcidiacono, Francesco & Antonio Bova
2015. Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 6 ► pp. 40 ff.
Arcidiacono, Francesco, Clotilde Pontecorvo & Antonio Bova
2022. “But the vanilla is healthy!” Children's expression of arguments to justify their non-compliances in family conversation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 34 ► pp. 100630 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2015. Favoring argumentative disciplinary discussions in the classroom. A study of teacher's questions at undergraduate and graduate levels. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 7 ► pp. 97 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2017. The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Argumentative Interactions in the Learning Contexts of Higher Education. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 75 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2019. Conclusions. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation, ► pp. 131 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2019. Introduction. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation, ► pp. 1 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2019. The Initial Phase of the Argumentative Discussions Between Parents and Children. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation, ► pp. 39 ff.
2020. Un estudio de los argumentos de autoridad utilizados por los padres con sus hijos durante las comidas. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :19 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2021. Dialogical construction of parental feeding strategies during family mealtimes. Journal of Health Psychology 26:10 ► pp. 1684 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2018. The interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children's reactions and topics of disagreement during family conversations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 19 ► pp. 124 ff.
Bova, Antonio, Francesco Arcidiacono & Fabrice Clément
2021. Embodied Displays of “Doing Thinking.” Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activities. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Iannaccone, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2017. Argumentation in Dialogue: Final Conclusions. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 201 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.