Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 4:2 (2016) ► pp.274296
References
Abu Mostapha, Hisham
2011The Manichean Demonization of the Other in Political Discourse: A Linguistic-Rhetorical Exploration. Düsseldorf: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Altunışık, Meliha B., and Lenore G. Martin
2011 “Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under the AKP.” Turkish Studies 12 (4): 569–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
Chastain, Mary
2014ISIS Fighter Claims Turkey Funds the Jihadist Group. Retrieved from: [URL].Google Scholar
Dal, Emel P
2012 “The Transformation of Turkey’s Relations with the Middle East: Illusion or Awakening?Turkish Studies 13 (2): 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Kelsey, and Daniel Horner
2013US Says Chemical Weapons Used in Syria. Retrieved from: [URL].Google Scholar
Davutoğlu, Ahmet
2001Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Jeopolitik Konumu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.Google Scholar
Ego, Dikran
2014Turkey Supports Al Qaeda in Syria. Complicit in the Kidnapping of Syrian Orthdodox Bishops. Retrieved from: [URL].Google Scholar
El-Hussari, Ibrahim A
2010 “President Bush’s Address to the Nation on U.S. Policy in Iraq: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska and Piotr Cap, 99–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Habermas, J
(1984) Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Christopher
2012 “Turkey’s Syria Problem.” Public Policy Research 19 (2): 137–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polat, Necati
2013 “Resistance to Regime Change in the Middle East.” Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 16 (5): 634–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd revised edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse and Society 22 (6): 781–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, Philip
2013 “Turkey’s ‘Double Gravity’ Predicament: The Foreign Policy of a Newly Activist Power.” International Affairs 89 (2): 381–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taşpınar, Ömer
2012 “Turkey’s Strategic Vision and Syria,The Washington Quarterly, 35 (3): 127–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Teun
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Teun, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse Historical Analysis.” Discourse and Society 1 (1): 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1995 “Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Bloomaert, 204–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity, vol. 21. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2001Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar