“Please protect the Jews”
Ideology and concealment in the Britain First solidarity patrol
This research examined Facebook comments in response to Britain First’s ‘solidarity patrol’ video, in which
Britain First is shown patrolling in Golders Green, North London, ostensibly to show support for the Jewish
community after the shooting in the Kosher supermarket in Paris following the Charlie Hebdo attack. A Critical Discursive
Psychological analysis was conducted on comments. Initial comments were identified as showing support and gratitude towards
Britain First; however, comments became progressively anti-Semitic (e.g. by posing the rhetorical question,
what benefits have Jews brought to Britain?). Results are discussed in terms of how Britain First has managed to
achieve anti-Islamic rhetoric whilst trying to maintain support from the mainstream. This research has identified that discussions
on Facebook have transitioned from Jews being constructed as vulnerable at the hands of Islamic extremism, to Jews being
problematic and the aggressors.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methods
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1“What have poor Jews ever done”: Showing support for Jews
- 3.2“I say this as a proud British Jew”: Comments from authors who identify themselves as Jewish
- 3.3“Who cares about the Jews?” comments displaying anti-semitic discourse
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (36)
References
Antaki, Charles. 2004. “The Uses of Absurdity.” In Analysing Race Talk, edited by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 85–102. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Augoustinos, Martha, and Every, Danielle. 2007. “The Language of ‘Race’ And Prejudice: A Discourse of Denial, Reason, and Liberal-practical Politics”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(2):123–141.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Billig, Mick. 1978. Fascists: A Social Psychological View of the National Front. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Billig, Mick, Condor, Susan, Edwards, Derek, Gane, Mike, Middleton, Drew, and Radley, Alan. 1988. Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, Shani, and Goodman, Simon. 2012. ‘“Bring Back Hitler’s Gas Chambers”: Asylum Seeking, Nazis And Facebook: A Discursive Analysis’. Discourse and Society23 (1): 19-33.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byford, Jovan, and Billig, Mick. 2001. “The Emergence of Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories in Yugoslavia during the War with NATO”. Patterns of Prejudice 35(4):50–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Capdevila, Rose, and Callaghan, Jane E. M. 2008. “‘It’s Not Racist. It’s Common Sense’: A Critical Analysis of Political Discourse around Asylum and Immigration in the UK.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 181:1–16.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drew, Paul. 1978. “Accusations: The Occasioned Use of Members’ Knowledge of ‘Religious Geography’ in Describing Events.” Sociology 12(1): 1–22.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drew, Paul, and Walker, Traci. 2009. “Going Too Far: Complaining, Escalating, and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 411:2400–2414.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dyers, Charlyn, and Wankah, Foncha John. 2012. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: The Discursive Construction of ‘the Other’ in Greenmarket Square, Cape Town.” Language and Intercultural Communication 12(3):230–247.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eatwell, Roger. 2000. “The Extreme Right and British Exceptionalism: The Primacy of Politics.” In The Politics of the Extreme Right, edited by Paul Hainsworth, 172–192. London: Biddles Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, Derek, and Potter, Jonathon. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foner, Nancy, and Alba, Richard. 2008. “Immigrant Religion in the US and Western Europe: Bridge or Barrier to Inclusion?” International Migration Review 421:360–392.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fozdar, Farida, and Pederson, Anne. 2013. “Diablogging about Asylum Seekers: Building a Counter-Hegemonic Discourse.” Discourse and Communication 7(4):371–388.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. A Genre Approach to the Study of (Im)politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 21:46–94.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garland, Jon, and Treadwell, James. 2010. “‘No Surrender to the Taliban!’: Football Hooliganism, Islamophobia and the Rise of the English Defence League”. Papers from the British Criminology Conference 101:19–35. [URL].
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodman, Simon, and Burke, Shani. 2010. ‘‘Oh You Don’t Want Asylum Seekers, Oh You’re just Racist’: A Discursive Analysis of Discussions about whether it’s Racist to Oppose Asylum Seeking’. Discourse and Society 21 (3): 325–340.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodman, Simon, and Johnson, Andrew. 2013. “Strategies Used by the Far Right to Counter Accusations of Racism.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6(2):97–113. [URL]
Heritage, John. 1998. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 271:291–334. [URL]
Jackson, Clare. 2013. “‘Why Do These Peoples’ Opinions Matter?’ Positioning Known Referents as Unnameable Others.” Discourse Studies 15(3):299–317.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, edited by George Psathas, 63–93. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jewish Times 2015. “British Jews Say ‘No Thanks’ to Nationalist Group’s Support.” Last modified 14th February. [URL].
Kirkwood, Steve, McKinlay, Andy, and McVittie, Chris. 2014. “‘Some People It’s Very Difficult to Trust’: Attributions of Agency and Accountability in Practitioners’ Talk about Integration. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 24(5):376–389.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lynn, Nick, and Lea, Susan. 2003. “‘A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid’: The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom.” Discourse and Society 14(4):425–452.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A New Way of Legitimating Claims.” Human Studies (Interaction and Language Special Issue) 91:219–230.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rhodes, James. 2009. “The Banal National Party: The Routine Nature of Legitimacy.” Patterns of Prejudice 43(2):142–160.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, John E. 2013. “Radical Populism in British Fascist Discourse: The Case of COMBAT and the British National Party (1960–1967).” In Analysing Fascist Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 181–202. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, John E., and Wodak, Ruth. 2009. “The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties.” Controversia, 6(2): 45–77. [URL]
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. “‘Hotrodders as a Revolutionary Category.” In Lectures on Conversation Vol I, II, edited by Gail Jefferson, 169–174. United Kingdom: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Treadwell, James. 2012. “White Riot: The English Defence League and the 2011 English Riots.” Criminal Justice Matters 87(1):36–37.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Treadwell, James, and Garland Jon. 2011. “Masculinity, Marginalization And Violence: A Case Study of the English Defence League.” British Journal of Criminology 511:621–634.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun. 1995. “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” In Language and Peace, edited by Christina Schäffner and Anita Wenden, 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verkuyten, Maykel. 2013. “Justifying Discrimination against Muslim Immigrants: Out‐group Ideology and the Five‐step Social Identity Model.” British Journal of Social Psychology 52(2):345–360.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wetherell, Margaret, and Edley, Nigel. 1999. “Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity: Imaginary Positions and Psycho Discursive Practises.” Feminism and Psychology 9(3):335–356.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wood, C. and Finlay, W. M. L. 2008. “British National Party Representations of Muslims in the Month after the London Bombings: Homogeneity, Threat, and the Conspiracy Tradition.” British Journal of Social Psychology 471:707–726.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Foster, Russell David & Xander Kirke
2023.
‘Straighten Up and Fly Right’: Radical right attempts to appeal to the British LGBTQ+ community.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 25:2
► pp. 277 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Burke, Shani, Parisa Diba & Georgios A Antonopoulos
2020.
‘You sick, twisted messes’: The use of argument and reasoning in Islamophobic and anti-Semitic discussions on Facebook.
Discourse & Society 31:4
► pp. 374 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.