This paper focuses on what appears to be the emergence of linguistic chauvinism in Brazil. Large-scale influx currently under way of foreign words (mostly from English) into the country’s national language, Portuguese, is being eyed with suspicion and distrust by large segments of the population. The current crisis was kick-started by a federal deputy in the House of Representatives who presented a controversial bill aimed at curbing the use of foreignisms by the use of law. Critics have however been quick to point out that the bill is a covert attempt to advance a political agenda. The paper examines the role of linguists in the unfolding national debate. After noting that they have by and large been set aside and have failed to bring the weight of their expert opinion to bear on the whole issue, I advance the claim that it is they themselves who are largely to blame. I conclude by making a plea that it is high time we as linguists did some soul-searching and asked ourselves whether, in our single-minded effort to theorise about language in total disregard for what the lay people think and believe about it, we have not isolated ourselves from them and rendered ourselves largely inconsequential. I suggest that Critical Linguistics may turn out to be one way of regaining some of the lost ground.
1925Why a linguistic society. (text of the lecture delivered on the occasion of the founding of the Linguistic Society of America). Language. 1.1. pp. 1–5.
Bramsted, E. K.
1965Goebbels and National Socialist Propaganda 1925–1945. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Buck, C. D.
1916Language and the sentiment of nationality. American Political Science Review. 101. pp. 44–69.
Câmara Jr., J. M.
1970Estrutura da Língua Portuguesa. 2nd. Ed. Petrópolis, Brazil: Editora Vozes.
Cardoso, S. A. M.
1999A geolingüística no Brasil: meio século de contribuição à ciência da linguagem e ao ensino da língua materna. Boletim da ABRALIN. No. 231. pp. 18–34.
de Castilho, A. T. and Altman, M. C. F. S.
1994Para a história da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística. Boletim da ABRALIN. 161. pp. 21–37.
2001Das besteiras consagradas. O Estado de São Paulo. January13th.
(Ed.)1985Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Newkspeak Today. London: Frances Printer.
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N.
1999Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
1989Purism, language, and creativity: the Sri Lankan experience. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 185–196.
1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Faraco, C. A.
2001Guerras em torno da língua. Folha de São Paulo. Caderno “Mais”. Pp. 30–31.
1988What national languages are good for. In Coulmas, F. (Ed.). 1988. With Forked Tongues. Singapore: Karoma Publishers. pp. 181–194.
Finatto, M. J. B.
2000O que trai o tradutor?Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 76–83.
Fiorin, J. L.
2000Considerações em torno do projeto de lei de defesa, proteção, promoção e uso do idioma apresentado à câmara dos deputados pelo deputado Aldo Rebelo. Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 62–75.
1968Nationality-nationalism and nation-nationism. In Fishman, J, Ferguson, C. A. and Das-Gupta, J. (Eds.). 1968. Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley. pp. 98–112.
1987Notes on critical linguistics. In Threadgold, T. and Steele, R. (Eds.) Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday. Amsterdam: John Bejamins.
1983Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Guedes, P. C.
2000E por que não nos defender da língua?Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 31–42.
Giles, H.et al.
1995Reactions to Anglo- and Hispanic-American-accented speakers: affect, identity, persuasion, and the English-only controversy. Language & Communication. 15.2. pp. 107–120.
1998Nationalism and language. In Mey, J. L. (Ed.) (1998). Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 635–641.
Hall, R. A.
1950Leave Your Language Alone! Ithaca, N. Y.: Linguistica.
Hodge, R and Kress, G.
1979Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
1989The politics of purity and exclusion: literary and linguistic movements of political empowerment in America, Africa, the South Pacific, and Europe. In In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 31–52.
1954Language Reform in Modern Turkey. Jerusalem: Israel Oriental Society.
1996Law lesson for linguists? Accountability and acts of professional classification. Language & Communication. 16.3. pp. 205–214.
Jernudd, B. H. and Uyangola, J.
1987The power of English in Sri Lanka: a survey of newspaper content and text. In Singh, U. N., and Srivastava, R. N. (Eds.). 1987. Perspectives in Language Planning. Calcutta: Mithila Darshan. pp. 60–94.
Jernudd, B. J.
1989The texture of language purism: an introduction. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 1–19.
Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J.
(Ed.)1989The Politics of Language Purism. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
1989Language reform movement and its language: the case of Persian. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 81–104.
1987Linguistic competence and folk theories of language. In Holland, D. & Quinn, N. (Eds.) 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1989Language policy during the fascist period: the case of language education. In Wodak, R. (Ed.) 1989. pp. 39–56.
1958Introduction to Vyakarana Vivaranaya. Colombo: Gunasena and Co. Ltd.
Kuhn, T. S.
1962The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The university of Chicago Press.
1982On the applicability of transformational-generative grammar. Applied Linguistics. 3.11. pp. 89–120.
1986Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
1989Linguists and the official language movement. Language. 65.6. pp. 579–595.
2001 Yankees, go home Revista da Educação28th March.
Oliveira, J. L.
2000Freio no estrangeirismo. Jornal de Brasília. August14th.
1994The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.
1998English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.
2000Efeito pela causa. Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 84–87.
1992Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1999aOf EFL teachers, conscience, and cowardice. ELT Journal. 53. 3.
1999bTuning up amidst the din of discordant notes: on a recent bout of identity crisis in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 9. 2. pp. 99–119.
1999cCritical approaches and their raison d’être: a rejoinder to Brumfit and Widdowson. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 9. 2. Pp. 127–134.
2000Critical pedagogy and linguistic imperialism in the EFL context. TESOL Journal. 9.4. Pp. 5–6.
2001aELT classroom as an arena for identity clashes. In Grigoletto, M. and Carmagnani, A. M. G. (Ed.) 2001. English as a Foreign Language: Identity, Practices, and Textuality. São Paulo: Humanitas, Pp. 23–29.
2001b. Review of A. S. Canagarajah: Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Word. 52 (3). Pp. 462–466.
Rajagopalan, K. and Rajagopalan, C.
forthcoming The English language in Brazil — a boon or a bane?. In Braine, G. Ed. Teaching English to the World Alexandria, VA, USA. TESOL Publishers
Animasaun, Kayode, M. Lionel Bender, Patrick J. Duffley, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Victor H. Mair, Victor H. Mair, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Ariane Reimann-Slater, Solomon I. Sara, Jacob J. Spa, Thomas Stolz, Thomas Stolz, Yuri Tambovtsev, Graham Thurgood, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda & Edward J. Vajda
2005. Reviews. <i>WORD</i> 56:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
2020. The Proliferation of English as a “World” Language. In Higher Education Internationalization and English Language Instruction, ► pp. 37 ff.
Lucena, Maria Inêz Probst & Ana Cecília da Gama Torres
2019. Ideologia monolíngue, mercantilização e instrumentalização da língua inglesa na alteração da LDB em 2017 e em anúncios publicitários de cursos livres. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 19:3 ► pp. 635 ff.
2005. Language essentialism and social hierarchies among Giriama and Swahili. Journal of Pragmatics 37:12 ► pp. 1919 ff.
2003. The ambivalent role of English in Brazilian politics. World Englishes 22:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
2004. Tesol and the question of learners’ cultural identity. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 145-146 ► pp. 167 ff.
2005. Language politics and the linguist. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 5:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
2008. The Role of Geopolitics in Language Planning and Language Politics in Brazil. Current Issues in Language Planning 9:2 ► pp. 179 ff.
2016. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 2001. <i>WORD</i> 62:3 ► pp. 192 ff.
2017. Prescription, language politics and the field of applied linguistics: A tribute to Prof. Alan Davies. Language & Communication 57 ► pp. 22 ff.
2020. Where English Is Headed in South America: A Speculative Glimpse. In Functional Variations in English [Multilingual Education, 37], ► pp. 167 ff.
Silva, Daniel N.
2015. Introduction. Pragmatics and Society 6:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Spolsky, B. & R.D. Lambert
2006. Language Planning and Policy: Models. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 561 ff.
2003. Language Policy,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.