Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 1:2 (2003) ► pp.221–239

War and peace

Ukrainian and Russian in Ukraine

| FCO Language Group, Foreign & Commonwealth Office, UK
The closing years of the 20th century provided increasing evidence of how changes in the political and socio-economic structures influence or sometimes even determine linguistic structure and/or behaviour. For this purpose the linguistic situation in Ukraine and the position of Ukrainian and Russian are examined in the period since the independence of the country in 1991 when rapid shifts in political, economic and cultural spheres have made a significant impact on language planning.
Language politics of post-Perestroika and post-Communist era in Ukraine has resulted in deliberate changes in both status and corpus planning leading to the elevation of Ukrainian as the only official (“state”) language and downgrading Russian which, however, remains functional in many regions of the country. The linguistic picture would be incomplete without analysis of a mixed Russian-Ukrainian variety Surzhyk, which is not something stable and permanent. It is undergoing significant changes in the present linguistic environment as it is becoming the oral and even written language not only of Ukrainophones but also of Russophones.
Keywords: language planning, language politics, Surzhyk, Ukraine, Ukrainian language, Russian language
Published online: 10 July 2003
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.1.2.04kro
References (32)
References
Balla, Mykola I. (ed). 1996. English-Ukrainian Dictionary. Kyiv: Osvita.Google Scholar
Chyrkov, Oleh. 1999. Pojava novoji tendenciji rozvytku etnichnoji struktury nasalennja Ukrajiny naprykinci 80-x — na pochatku 90-x rr. [New tendency in the development of the ethnic structure of Ukrainian population at the end of 80s — beginning 90s]. Moloda natsija, 111, 3–24.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1997. Introduction: On the undoing and redoing of corpus planning. In Michael Clyne (ed). Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Constitution of Ukraine (The). 1996. Kyiv: Femina.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deychakiwsky, Orest. 1994. National minorities in Ukraine. The Ukrainian Quarterly 50(4), 371–379.Google Scholar
Dzyuba, Ivan. 1970. Internationalism or Russification. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Editorial. 2000. Urjad maje namir stymuljuvaty ukrajinizaciju [The Government has an intention to stimulate Ukrainiazation]. Den’, 17, 1.Google Scholar
Fasmer, Max. 1971. Etimological Dictionary of the Russian Language. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1968. The Sociology of Language. In: Joshua A. Fishman (ed). Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974. Language planning and language planning research: the state of the art. In Joshua A. Fishman (ed). Advances in Language Planning. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 15–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974. Language modernization and planning in comparison with other types of national modernization and planning. In: Joshua A. Fishman (ed). Advances in Language Planning. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hrinchenko, Borys. 1909. Slovar’ Ukrajins’koji Movy. Kyiv: Kievs’ka Starina.Google Scholar
Jernudd, Bjorn. 1989. The Future of Language Purism: an Introduction. In Bjorn Jernudd and Michael Shapiro (eds). The Politics of Language Purism. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachlovs’kyj, Les’. 2000. ‘Problema movy v Ukrajini chy problema mentalitetu ukrajintsiv?’ [The language problem in Ukraine or the problem of mentality of Ukrainians?]. Den’, 70, 4.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B. and Richard B. Baldauf Jr. 1997. Language Planning From Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1969. Research possibilities in group bilingualism. Québec: International Center for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Kocherha, Olha. 1994. Deyaki mirkuvannya pro shljaxy i manivtsi rozvytku ukrajins’koji naukovoji terminolohiji’ [Some thoughts on the ways and methods of the development of Ukrainian science terminology]. Suchasnist’, 71, 173–174.Google Scholar
Kremen’, Vasyl’. 2000. Vasyl’ Kremen’s interview. Den’, 47, 4.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras and Andrew Wilson. 1994. Ukraine: perestroika to independence. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law on Languages in the Ukrainian SSR (The). 1989. Vidomosti Verchovnoji Rady URSR, 451, 58–67Google Scholar
Masenko, Larysa. 1999. Mova and Polityka [Language and Politics]. Kyiv: Sonyashnyk.Google Scholar
Panchuk, May. 1988. Istorychna pam’iat’ — faktor perebudovy [Memory of history — a factor for restructuring]. Literaturna Ukrajina, 271, 6–7.Google Scholar
Plyushch, Maria. 1994. Suchasna Ukrajins’ka Literaturna Mova [Contemporary Ukrainian Literary Language]. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola.Google Scholar
Ponomariv, Oleksandr. 1991. Suchasna Ukrajins’ka Literaturna Mova [Contemporary Ukrainian Literary Language]. Kyiv: Lybid’.Google Scholar
Popovych, Myroslav (ed). 1999. UDE Universal Dictionary-Encyclopedia. Kyiv: Iryna.Google Scholar
Sheremet, Hanna and Lesya Xanzha. 2000. Pozytyvni stymuly zamist’ pokaran’ — krashchyj variant zmicnennja ukrajins’koji movy [Positive stimuli instead of punishment — the best option for the strengthening of the Ukrainian language]. Den’, 13, 1.Google Scholar
Sheremet, Hanna, Natalja Trofimova, Oleksandr Michel’son. 2000. Hra na zahostrennja [Playing to confrontation]. Den’, 25, 1.Google Scholar
Shevelov, George Y. 1986. The Language Question in the Ukraine in the Twentieth Century (1900–1941). Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 10(1/2), 71–163.Google Scholar
Slovnyk Ukrajins’koji Movy. 1978. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.Google Scholar
Tauli, Valter. 1974. The Theory of Language Planning. In Joshua A. Fishman (ed). Advances in Language Planning. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 49–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieczorek, Diana. 1997. Ukrainkij yazyk Slavia Romana — Slavia Byzantina Ocherki po glagolnosti. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Krouglov, Alex
2022. Language planning and policies in Russia through a historical perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning 23:4 ► pp. 412 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.