Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 10:2 (2011) ► pp.227–247
Making analogy work in the public arena
This paper discusses the Israeli newspaper coverage of a single event of considerable public significance in the Israeli-Palestinian context. A dominant analogy in the coverage that played various argumentative roles and its responses are analyzed. When trying to answer the question of how to respond to an analogy put forward by a participant in a communication, various methods available to the interlocutor are mentioned, two of which are shown to be rhetorically effective in this case: (1) acceptance of the analogy enables the interlocutor to expand and enrich it into new argumentative directions; (2) a mere rejection of an analogy, without explicitly pointing to specific deficiencies in it or offering an alternative analogy, is shown to be potentially effective when its power stems from the use of irony: Ironic utterances allow for the explicit mention of the analogy, while at the same time holding it up to ridicule, thereby causing the rival’s arguments to be indirectly rejected. This method of rejection is not discussed in the literature on analogy. The analysis demonstrates the ways in which a figurative analogy might be effective although there is no difficulty to attack and refute it. In a complex context such as the political arena, the pragmatic effectiveness may be more relevant than incoherence, thus an analogy is not necessarily judged according to normative criteria.
Keywords: rhetoric, analogy, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, argumentation, political discourse, irony
References
Aragones, Enriqueta, Gilboa, Itzhak, Postlewaite, Andrew, and Schmeidler, David
2001 Rhetoric and analogies. Working papers from The Foerder Institute for Economic Research 15, TelAviv University.
Azar, Moshe
1997 Concession relations as argumentation. Text 17(3), 301–316. 
Beardsley, Monroe C.
1950 Practical Logic. New York: Prentice Hall.
Brown, William R.
1989 Two traditions of analogy. Informal Logic 11(3), 161–172.
1995 The domain constraint on analogy and analogical argument. Informal Logic 17(1), 89–100.
Copi, Irving M.
1990 Introduction to Logic. 8th edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Doury, Marianne
2009 Argument schemes typologies in practice: The case of comparative arguments. In: F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (eds.). Pondering on problems of Argumentation. Springer, 141–155.
Garsson, Bart
2009 Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedures. In: F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (eds.). Pondering on problems of Argumentation. Springer, 133–140.
Gentner, Dedre
1983 Structure-Mapping: A theoretical Framework for analogy. Cognitive Sciences 71, 155–170.
1989 The mechanisms of analogical learning. In: S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, Dedre and Artour B. Markman
1997 Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity. American Psychologist 52(1), 45–56.
Gentner, Dedre and Landers Russell
1983 Analogy reminding: A good match is hard to find”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Tucson, Arizona.
Govier, Trudy
1989 Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11(3), 141–152.
Grice, Paul
1989 Studies in the way of words. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Holyoak, K.J. and Thagard, P.
1995 Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johansen, Jorgen Dines
2002 Literary discourse: A Semiotic-Pragmatic approach to Literature. Toronto Studies in Semiotics and Communication Series.
Johnson, Fred
1989 Analogical arguing and explaining. Informal Logic 11(3), 153–160.
Juthe, André
2005 Argument by analogy. Argumentation 19(1), 1–27.
Little, Joseph
2001 Toward Sociocultural Sensitivity in Rhetorical Studies of Analogy: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31(3), 257–266.
Livnat, Zohar
2004 On verbal irony, meta-linguistic knowledge and echoic interpretation. Pragmatics & Cognition 12(1), 57–70.
2005 Argumentation in a Complex Action Game: A Court Judgment as a Dialogic Suasive Text. Studies in Communication Sciences. Special issue: Argumentation in Dialogic interaction, 203–214.
Macagano, Fabrizio and Walton, Douglas
2009 Argument from Analogy in Law: the classical tradition, and recent theories. Philosophy and Rhetoric 42(2), 154–182.
Measell, James S.
1976 Development of the concept of analogy in rhetorical theory. Rhetoric and Communication, In: Jane Blankenship and Herman G. Stelzner (eds). Studies in the University of Illinois Tradition. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 47–55.
Ophir, Adi
2000 The Identity of the Victims and the Victims of Identity: A Critique of Zionism for a Post-Zionist Age. In: L. Silberstein (ed). Mapping Jewish Identities, New York University Press.
Perelman Chaim
1982 The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by W. Kulback. University of Notre Dame Press.
Perelman Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Luci
1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. University of Notre Dame Press.
Shelly, Cameron
2004 Analogy counterarguments: A taxonomy for critical thinking. Argumentation 181, 223–238.
Schank, R.C.
1982 Dynamic Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre
1981 Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Peter Cole (ed.). Radical Pragmatics. New York: American Press, 295–318.
Stebbing, Susan
1938 Thinking to Some Purpose. London: Pelican Books.
Stull, Bradford T.
2001 The Elements of Figurative Language, Longman.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, R.
(1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectic Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, R. and Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.
2002 Argumentation Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Waller, Bruce N.
2001 Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21(3), 199–218.
Walton, Douglas
2008 Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weizman, Elda
2001 Addresser, Addressee and Target: Negotiating Roles through Ironic Criticism. In: Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal (eds) Negotiation: The Dialogic Question. Amsterdam / Phildelphia: Benjamins, 125–137.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Lavie-Dinur, Amit, Yuval Karniel & Tal Azran
2015. ‘Bad girls’: the use of gendered media frames in the Israeli media's coverage of Israeli female political criminals. Journal of Gender Studies 24:3 ► pp. 326 ff. 
Lavie-Dinur, Amit, Yuval Karniel & Tal Samuel-Azran
2013. “Our” Criminals—Israeli Press Coverage of Domestic Political Criminals. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 42:3 ► pp. 275 ff.
Lynch, John A., Aaron J. Goldenberg, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison & Kyle B. Brothers
2020. Analogies in Genomics Policymaking: Debates and Drawbacks. The American Journal of Human Genetics 107:5 ► pp. 797 ff.
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 428 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.