Argumentation and fallacy in newspaper op / ed coverage of the prelude to the invasion of Iraq
This study examines how the pre-war debate of the U.S. decision to invade Iraq was discursively constructed in pro- and anti-war newspaper op/ed argumentation. Drawing on insights from argumentation theory, and using these within a framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, we explore fallacious arguments within the ‘justification discourse’ used in the pro-war opinion/editorials (op/eds). We argue that the type of arguments marshalled by the pro-war op/ed commentators uncritically bolstered the set of U.S. official ‘truth claims’ and ‘presuppositions’. Conversely, anti-war op/ed debaters dismissed the Bush administration’s ‘neo-imperialistic’ reasoning and called into question the logic of militarist ‘humanitarianism’ by arguing that brute force and daylight ‘plunder,’ found in the language of a ‘noble ideal,’ were part of a long Western colonialist tradition that glorified the West as the ‘civiliser’ of distant cultural others.
Keywords: Argumentation, fallacy, CDA, media discourse, Iraq, op/eds
Published online: 22 March 2012
Cited by 5 other publications
Blassnig, Sina, Florin Büchel, Nicole Ernst & Sven Engesser
Chang, Gordon C., Kerstin Lueck & Hugh B. Mehan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Adeodato, Joao Mauricio
Altheide, David. L. and Grimes, J. N..
Bellamy, Alex J.
Benson, Rodney and Hallin, Daniel C.
Blommaert, Jan and Verschueren, Jef
Boggs, Carl and Pollard, Tom
Crick, Ruth D. and Joldersma, Clarence W.
De Wijze, Stephen
Dijk,Teun A. Van
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob
Eemeren Frans H. Van, Grootendorst Rob, Snoeck Henkemans A. Francisca, Blair J. Anthony, Johnson Ralph H., Krabbe Erick C.W., Plantin Christian, Walton Douglas N., Willard Charles A., Woods John and David Zarefsky
Eemeren Frans H. van, Meuffels Bert and Verburg Mariël
Eemeren Frans H. van and Grootendorst Rob
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Houtlosser, Peter
Feteris, Eveline T.
Gerges, Fawaz A.
Greenberg, Joshua and Hier, Sean
Hackett, Robert A. and Zhao, Yuezhi
Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo
Hartnett, Stephen J. and Stengrim, Laura A.
Ihnen, Constanza and Richarson, John E.
2011 On combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis http://newcastle.academia.edu/JohnRichardson/Papers/914039/_2011.
Ismael, Tareq Y. and Ismael, Jacqueline S.
Jacobs, Scott and Aakhus, Mark
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay and Lewis, Evan
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
Leeuwen, Theo van and Wodak, Ruth
Manolescu, Beith Innocenti
Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M.
Nikolaev, Alexander and Porpora, Douglas
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
Richardson, John E. and Wodak, Ruth
Simon-Vandenbergen Anne-Marie, White Peter R. R. and Aijmer Karin
Wilkins, Karin and Downing, John
Winkler, Carol K.
Wodak Ruth, de Cillia Rudolf, Reisigl Martin and Liebhart Karin
Yaphe, Judith S.
2005 Bush policy and the (de)stabilization of the Persian Gulf. In: Louis J. Cantori and Augustus Richard Norton. (eds). Evaluating the Bush Menu for Change in the Middle East. A roundtable of the conference group at the American Political Science Association Annual meeting, Chicago, Sep.5th, 2004 Middle East Policy XII(1), 108—110.