Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:3 (2012) ► pp.336–356

The “image bite,” political language, and the public/private divide

NBC News coverage of Hillary Clinton from scorned wife to Senate candidate

| Carnegie Mellon University
| University of Maryland
| Educational Testing Service, Princeton
Voice-overs with muted images, often known as the “image bite,” have become an increasingly used but understudied format of political language by the television news media. Because the media can use images to fit many contexts and purposes of commentary, the media images are susceptible to continuous de-contextualization and re-contextualization. Drawing from theories of feminist critical discourse analysis and gender performance as well as scholarship on the public/private divide, we examine the commentary of one U.S. television news organization’s (NBC) re-contextualization of the same stock footage of Hillary Clinton over 10 newscasts spanning 20 months from August 1998 to June of 2000. NBC re-enforces the public/private binary in conventional masculine terms. Yet it also worked, at times, to unify the binary when covering Hillary Clinton’s U.S. Senate campaign; on those occasions at least, NBC revealed the potential erosion of gender stereotypes and a small but still significant role for human agency in the study of gender ideology.
Keywords: Image bites, image re-contextualization, image de-contextualization, feminist critical discourse analysis, diachronic discourse analysis, public and private spheres, women in media, Hillary Clinton
Published online: 26 November 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.02kau
References (26)
References
Beigman Klebanov, Beata, Daniel Diermeier, and Eyal Beigman. 2008. “Automatic Annotation of Semantic Fields for Political Science Research.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 5 (1): 95—120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Masculine Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Elisabeth. 2000, Feb 22. Clinton Campaign Confronts Erosion of Women’s Support. New York Times. Accessed December 25, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/22/nyregion/clinton-campaign-confronts-erosion-of-women-s-support.html.
. 2000, Nov. 12. “The Election. It Took A Woman; How Gender Helped Elect Hillary Clinton.” New York Times. Accessed December 25, 2010. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?%20res=9F01E1DF1238F931A25752C1A9669C8B63.
Burnett, Ron. 1995. Cultures of Vision: Images, Media and the Imaginary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John Angus. 1990. “Between the fragment and the icon: Prospect for a rhetorical house of the middle way.” Western Journal of Communication, 54 (3): 346—376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Anabela. 2008. “Media(ted) Discourse and Society: Rethinking the Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journalism Studies 9 (2): 161—177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deerwester, Scott, Suan Dumais, George Furnas, Thomas Landauer, and Richard Harshman. 1990. “Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (6): 391—407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Julie, William Lyons, and Lance Svehla. 2010. Sound-bite Saboteurs: Public Discourse, Education, and the State of Democratic Deliberation. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1991. “Bartok’s Funeral: Representations of Europe in Hungarian Political Rhetoric.” American Ethnologist 18 (3): 440—458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction.” Differences 13 (1): 77—95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman (eds). 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, and Erik Page Bucy. 2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Lucy. 2001. Physiognomy and the Meaning of Expression in Nineteenth-Century Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2005. “Power and Discourse at Work: Is Gender Relevant?” In Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power, and Ideology in Discourse, ed. by Michelle M. Lazar, 31—60. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, George, Christine Armstrong, Robert Milroy, and James Piper. 1973. “An Associative Thesaurus of English and its Computer Analysis.” In The Computer and Literary Studies, ed. by A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey and N. Hamilton-Smith, 153—165. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Landes, Joan B. 2003. “Further Thoughts on the Public/Private Distinction.” Journal of Women’s History 15 (2): 28—39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, George. 1990. “Wordnet: An On-Line Lexical Database.” International Journal of Lexicography 3 (4): 235—312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minic, Danica. 2008. “What Makes An Issue A 'Woman's Hour' Issue?: The Politics of Recognition and Media Coverage of Women's Issues and Perspectives.” Feminist Media Studies 8 (3): 301—315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Douglas, Cathy McEvoy, and Thomas Schreiber. 2004. “The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36 (3): 402—407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, Lester C., Cara A. Finnegan, and Diane S. Hope. 2008. “Visual Rhetoric in Communication: Continuing Questions and Contemporary Issues.” In Visual Rhetoric: A Reader in Communication and American Culture, ed. by Lester C. Olson, Cara A. Finnegan and Diane S. Hope, 1—14. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth E. 2003. “Cherie: Lawyer, Wife, Mum”: Contradictory Patterns of Representation in Media Reports of Cherie Booth/Blair.” Discourse & Society 14 (5): 559—579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry-Giles, Shawn J. 2000. “Mediating Hillary Rodham Clinton: Television News Practices and Image-Making In The Postmodern Age.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 17 (2): 205—226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Clare. 2001. Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Wendorf, Richard. 1990. The Elements of Life: Biography and Portrait-Painting in Stuart and Georgian England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1999. “Critical Discourse Analysis at the End of the 20th Century.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (1&2): 185—193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rheindorf, Markus
2019. From Synchronic to Diachronic Perspectives: Mapping Change Across Time. In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Stewart, Leicha
2019. Spaces of exclusion: The visual construction of Australian borders and the asylum seeker subject in television news reports of the 2013 Australian Federal Election. Borderlands Journal 18:2 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.