Consociational democracy theory attributes an important role to the subgroup elites. They have to build the bridges between the subgroups and govern together in a divided and segmented society. This need for an accommodating elite has been criticized — among others — for its unrealistic expectations. A compromising attitude can hardly be expected when the subgroup leaders need to remain acceptable and legitimate among their rank and file. Post-electoral guarantees for power sharing are not enough to ensure real and functioning power sharing. In this article we focus on Belgium — a textbook example of consociational democracy — and more in particular on the difficult post-election period of 2007. We analyze newspaper interviews with both moderate and radical Belgian political leaders and illustrate how their discourse is torn between loyalty to the rank and file and the necessity of consociational power sharing. A combination of critical discourse and framing analysis shows how this representation is built up linguistically through an interplay of names used to describe oneself, the specific use of the pronouns of the first person plural and consistent metaphors.
1965“A Developmental Approach to Political Systems.”World Politics 171: 183—214.
Bartlett, Frederic
1932Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge , UK: University Press.
Barry, Brian
1975“The Consociational Model and its Dangers.”European Journal of Political Research 3 (4): 393—412.
Bogaards, Matthijs
1998“The Favourable Factors for Consociational Democracy: A Review.”European Journal of Political Research 331: 475—496.
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.
Carvalho, Anabela
2008“Media(ted) Discourse and Society.”Journalism Studies 9 (2): 161—177.
Deschouwer, Kris
2002“Falling Apart Together. The Changing Nature of Belgian Consociationalism, 1961—2000.”Acta Politica 371: 68—85.
Deschouwer, Kris
2009The Politics of Belgium. Governing a Divided Society. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Deschouwer, Kris, and Philippe Van Parijs
2011“Electoral Engineering for a Stalled Federation: A Country-Wide Electoral District for Belgium’s Federal Parliament.” In Just democracy. The Rawls-Machiavelli Programme, ed. by Philippe Van Parijs, 123—142.
Essex: ECPR Press
. Entman, Robert M1993“Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.”Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51—58.
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. London, New York: Longman.
Gamson, William A., and Kathryn E. Lasch
1983“The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy.” In Evaluating the Welfare State. Social and Political Perspectives, ed. by Shimon E. Spiro and Ephraim Yuchtman-Yaar, 397—415. New York: Academic Press.
Gamson, William A., David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Theodore Sasson
1992“Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality.”Annual Review of Sociology 181: 373—393.
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Hooghe, Marc, and Kris Deschouwer
2011“Proceed with Caution. Veto Players and Electoral Reform in Belgium.”West European Politics 341: 626—643.
Horowitz, Donald
1985Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Lijphart, Arend
1968The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of Berkeley Press.
Lijphart, Arend
1977Democracy in Plural Societies. Yale: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend
(ed)1981Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium. The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society. Berkeley: Institute of International studies, University of Berkeley.
Lijphart, Arend
1999Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend
2002“The Evolution of Consociational Theory and Consociational Practices, 1965—2000.”Acta Politica 371: 11—22.
Lijphart, Arend
2008Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lipset, Seymour M
1963Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.
McGarry, John, and Brendan O’Leary
2006“Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland’s Conflict, and its Agreement 2: What Critics of Consociation can Learn from Northern Ireland.”Government and Opposition 41 (2): 249—277.
McQuail, Denis
2005McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, 5th ed. London: Sage.
Mautner, Gerlinde
2008“Analysing Newspapers, Magazines and Other Print Media.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michal Krzyzanowski, 30—53. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm
(eds)1999Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Leary, Brendan
2005“Debating Consociational Democracy. Normative and Explanatory Arguments.” In From Power Sharing to Democracy. Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies, ed. by Sid Noel, 3—43. McGill Queens University Press.
Pan, Zhongdang P., and Gerald M. Kosicki
1993“Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.”Political Communication 10 (1): 55—75.
Pelinka, Anton
2002“Consociational Democracy in Austria: Political Change, 1968—1998.”Acta Politica 371: 139—156.
2008“Political Journalism across the Language Border: Communicative Behaviour in Political Interviews by Dutch- and French-speaking Journalists with Dutch- and French-speaking Politicians in Federal Belgium.” In Multilingualism and Applied Comparative Linguistics, Vol. II1, ed. by Frank Boers, Jeroen Darquennes, Koen Kerremans, and Rita Temmerman, 110—138. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2009“Patterns of Inconsistency. Naming and Transitivity in the Coverage of the World Youth Day 2005 in the Flemish Press.” In Analysis of Faith and Media: Representation and Communication, ed. by Hans Geybels, Sara Mels, and Michel Walrave, 71—102. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Tuchman, Gaye
1978Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
Van Dijk, Teun A
1993Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.
Van Gorp, Baldwin
2007“The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In.”Journal of Communication 57 (1): 60—87.
Verschueren, Jef
2001“Predicaments of Criticism.”Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 59—81.
Wodak, Ruth
1996Disorders of Discourse. London and New York: Longman.
2024. A three-legged race: assessing the functionality of consociational power-sharing with cabinet conflict-resolution data from Belgium (1979–2006). Acta Politica
Temmerman, Martina & Raymond Harder
2021. Different Shades of Hate: The Grey Zone between Offensive and Discriminatory Language in the Social Media Accounts of Flemish Politicians. In Discourse and Conflict, ► pp. 147 ff.
Dieltjens, Sylvain M. & Priscilla C. Heynderickx
2014. Weis More Than You Plus I. The Interpretation of the We-Forms in Internal Business Communications. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 44:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
2014. Drawing Belgium: Using Mental Maps to Measure Territorial Conflict. Territory, Politics, Governance 2:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.