Managing ideological differences in joint political press conferences
A study of the strategic use of the personal pronoun ‘we’
Ulla Moberg | Örebro University
Göran Eriksson | Örebro University
This study focuses on Swedish political press conferences and explores the discursive efforts of politicians to express unity despite diverging ideological views. It concerns the use of the first person pronoun ‘we’ (Swedish. we) and is influenced by both dialogue theory and linguistic theories, which highlight the meaning of pronouns in context. The data consist of transcribed web broadcasts of press conferences with the leaders of the four political parties that form the Swedish Government since 2006. Our analysis reveals that a clear-cut use of the personal pronoun ‘we’ can serve the same political purposes as a more ambiguous use, i.e. to show unity while there are differences. The four party leaders are involved in a communicative project of ‘doing unity’ to demonstrate that they are a very capable government.
Keywords: political communication, press conferences, dialogue theory, pronouns, communicative project, journalism, politics
Published online: 27 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.01mob
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.01mob
References
Banning, Stephen A., and Susan Billingsley
2007 “Journalist Aggressiveness in Joint Versus Solo Presidential Press Conferences.” Mass Communication & Society 10 (4), 461–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205430701580672
Bazzanella, Carla
2002 “The Significance of Context in Comprehension: The ‘We Case’.” Foundations of Science 7 (3): 239–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019657025835
Benveniste, Émile
Bhatia, Aditi
2006 “Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences.” Discourse & Society 17 (2): 173–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058057
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2006 “‘Who Are We and Who Are You?’ The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text & Talk 26 (1): 3–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002
Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schäffner
Chilton, Paul A., & Christina Schäffner
Clayman, Steven E
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie L. McDonald
2006 “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 561–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x
2007 “When Does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 72 (1): 23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102
Clayman, Steven E., & John Heritage
(2002) The News Interview. Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623
Cramer, Jennifer
2010 “‘Do We Really Want to be Like Them?’: Indexing Europeaness through Pronominal Use.” Discourse & Society 21 (6): 619–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926510381217
de Fina, Anna
1995 “Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Text 15 (3): 379–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379
Ekström, Mats, Åsa Kroon, and Mats Nylund
Ekström, Mats
2009 “Power and Affiliation in Presidential Press Conferences: A Study on Interruptions, Jokes and Laughter.” Journal of Language and Politics 8 (3): 386–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.03eks
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
2008 “‘Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence’. The Strategic Use of Pronouns in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 271–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet
Ínigo-Mora, Isabel
2004 “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini
Jacobs, Geert
2010 “Press Conferences on the Internet: Technology, Mediation and Access in the News.” Journal of Pragmatics. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma. 2010.09.019.
Linell, Per
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
Montgomery, Martin
2008 “The Discourse of the Broadcast News Interview.” Journalism Studies 9 (2): 260–277.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848303
Mühlhäusler, Peter, & Rom Harré
Pennycook, Alistair
1994 “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal Volume 48 (2): 173–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.2.173
Petersoo, Pille
Phillips, Louise
1996 “Rhetoric and the Spread of the Discourse of Thatcherism.” Discourse and Society 7 (2): 209–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007002004
Thornborrow, Joanna
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock
Watson, Cate & Aileen Ireland
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.