What’s in a word? Your enemy combatant is my refugee
The role of simultaneous interpreters in negotiating the lexis of Guantánamo in the European Parliament
Morven Beaton-Thome | Cologne University of Applied Sciences
As a result of the fierce controversy surrounding Guantánamo Bay detention camp, the process of naming, or lexicalising, the group of individuals detained there has become central in legitimising or challenging their detention. This positioning becomes even more complex when conducted in a multilingual setting where such lexical choices are also simultaneously interpreted. In this paper, a case study of a simultaneously interpreted plenary debate from the European Parliament (EP) on the potential resettlement of Guantánamo detainees in European Union (EU) member states is presented, with particular focus on the impact of simultaneous interpreting on the negotiation of contested lexical labels. After conceptualising plenary debate at the EP as multivoiced discourse (Bakhtin 1981), this paper investigates the rhetorical strategies employed in the process of overlexicalising Guantánamo detainees throughout the German and English original and interpreted versions of the debate. Interpreter response to controversial lexical labels is then explored, before instances of interpreter intervention in the form of lexical contraction and self-correction are analysed in relation to the ideological impact of such intervention on the multiple voices present in the debate.
Keywords: Guantánamo, political discourse, Bakhtin, multivoicedness, lexicalisation, overlexicalisation, simultaneous interpreting, European Parliament, lexical contraction
Published online: 27 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.04bea
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.04bea
References
Amnesty International
2008 17 Uighur Detainees Held at Guantánamo. AMR 51/137/2008. Brighton: Amnesty International.
2009 Different Label, Same Policy? AMR 51/038/2009. London: Amnesty International Secretariat.
Baker, Mona
2010 “Interpreters and Translators in the War Zone: Narrated and Narrators.” The Translator 16 (2): 197–222. 
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist; trans. Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
Bazzi, Samia
(2009) Arab News and Conflict. A Multidisciplinary Discourse Study (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beaton, Morven
2007a Intertextuality and Ideology in Interpreter-Mediated Communication: The Case of the European Parliament. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
2007b Interpreted Ideologies in Institutional Discourse: The Case of the European Parliament. The Translator 13 (2): 271–296.
Beaton-Thome, Morven
2010 Negotiating Identities in the European Parliament. The Role of Simultaneous Interpreting. In Text and Context. Essays on Translation and Interpreting in Honour of Ian Mason, ed. by Mona Baker, Maeve Olohan, and María Calzada-Pérez, 117–138. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Billig, Michael
(1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
Calzada Pérez, Maria
(1997) Transitivity in Translation. The Interdependence of Texture and Context. A Contrastive Study of Original and Translated Speeches in English and Spanish from the European Parliament. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
(2007) Transitivity in Translating. The Interdependence of Texture and Context. Berne: Peter Lang.
Centre for Constitutional Rights website
2010 http://www.ccrjustice.org/ [last accessed 29 May 2013].
International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) website
2010 http://www.fidh.org/ [last accessed 29 May 2013].
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner
(eds) (2002) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Connor-Linton, Jeff
1999 Competing Communicative Styles and Crosstalk: A Multifeature Analysis. Language in Society 281: 25–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001025.
van Dijk, Teun A
(1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London & Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dilley, Roy M
2002 The Problem of Context in Social and Cultural Anthropology. Language and Communication 221: 437–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00019-8.
Duden
2006 Was Sie schon immer wissen wollten: Die Litotes. Duden Newsletter. 16 June 2006. Available online at: http://www.duden.de/sprachwissen/newsletter/duden-newsletter-vom-16-06-06 [last accessed 29 May 2013].
European Parliament Resolution on Guantánamo
2006 Text adopted on 16 February 2006. [P6_TA(2006)0070]. Full Text available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2006-0070&language=EN [last accessed 29 May 2013].
European Parliament Resolution on the Fight Against Terrorism
2007 Text adopted on 12 December 2007. [P6_TA(2007)0612]. Full Text available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2007-0612&language=EN [last accessed 29 May 2013].
European Parliament website
2010 http://www.europarl.europa.eu [last accessed 29 May 2013].
Fairclough, Norman
(1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
(1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fowler, Roger, and Gunther Kress
1979 “Critical Linguistics.” In Language and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 185–213. London: Routledge.
Fowler, Roger
1985 “Power.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 61–82. London: Academic Press.
Gill, Terry D., and Elies van Sliedregt
2005 “Guantánamo Bay: A Reflection on the Legal Status and Rights of ‘Unlawful Enemy Combatants’.” Utrecht Law Review 1 (1): 28–54.
Guardian Online
2010 Guardian Special Report: Guantánamo Bay. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/guantanamo-bay [last accessed 29 May 2013].
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
(1978) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edwin Arnold.
Hodges, Adam, and Chad Nilep
(eds) (2007) Discourse, War and Terrorism (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Inghilleri, Moira
2010 ““You Don’t Make War Without Knowing Why”: The Decision to Interpret in Iraq.” The Translator 16 (2): 175–196.
Intelligence Squared US Debates
2010 “Treat Terrorists Like Enemy Combatants, Not Criminals.” Debate from 14 September 2010. Recording and transcript available online at: http://intelligencesquaredus.org/ [last accessed 29 May 2013].
Jiang, Xiangying
2006 “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Differences in US and Chinese Press Conferences: The Case of the North Korea Nuclear Crisis.” Discourse and Society 17 (2): 237–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060249.
Marzocchi, Carlo
2007 “Translation -Transcript – Interpretation. Notes on the European Parliament Verbatim Report of Proceedings.” Across Languages and Cultures 8 (2): 249–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/Acr.8.2007.2.6.
Mason, Ian
2003/2004 “Text Parameters in Translation. Transitivity and Beyond.” In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 470–481. London and New York: Routledge.
Maxwell, Mark David ‘Max’, and Sean M. Watts
2007 “‘Unlawful Enemy Combatant’: Status, Theory of Culpability, or Neither?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (1): 19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql100.
Tobia, Simona
2010 “Crime and Judgement: Interpreters/Translators in British War Crimes Trials, 1945–1949.” The Translator 16 (2): 275–293.
Worthington, Andy
US Congress
2010 National Defense Authorization Act for the Fiscal Year 2010. H.R. 2647. Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr2647enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr2647enr.pdf [last accessed 29 May 2013].
US Supreme Court
2004a Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (03–6696) 542 U.S. 507 (2004). Available online at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/03pdf/03–6696.pdf [last accessed 29 May 2013].
2004b Rumsfeld v. Padilla (03–1027) 542 U.S. (2004). Available online at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/03pdf/03–1027.pdf [last accessed 29 May 2013].
2004c Rasul v. Bush (03–334) 542 U.S. (2004). Available online at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/03pdf/03–334.pdf [last accessed 29 May 2013].
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
2020. How much noise can you make through an interpreter?.
Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:2 ► pp. 238 ff. 
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
2022. Interpreting nonmainstream ideology (Euroscepticism) in the European Parliament.
Perspectives 30:4 ► pp. 678 ff.
Beaton-Thome, Morven
2020.
In Multilingualism and Politics,
► pp. 105 ff.
Bendazzoli, Claudio
2023. Breaching Protocol and Flouting Norms on the European Parliament Floor.
Contrastive Pragmatics ► pp. 1 ff.
Gao, Fei
2021. Making sense of nationalism manifested in interpreted texts at ‘Summer Davos’ in China.
Critical Discourse Studies 18:6 ► pp. 688 ff.
Gao, Fei
2022. A brief review of studies on interpreters' ideological mediation/intervention at international conferences.
Frontiers in Communication 7
Gu, Chonglong
2018. Forging a glorious past via the ‘ present perfect’ : A corpus-based CDA analysis of China’s past accomplishments discourse mediat(is)ed at China’s interpreted political press conferences.
Discourse, Context & Media 24 ► pp. 137 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2019. (Re)manufacturing consent in English.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 31:3 ► pp. 465 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2019. Interpreters caught up in an ideological tug-of-war?.
Translation and Interpreting Studies 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2019. Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: a CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017).
Critical Discourse Studies 16:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2020.
In Corpus-based Approaches to Grammar, Media and Health Discourses [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 197 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2022. Interpreters as Vital (Re)Tellers of China’s Reform and Opening-Up Meta-Narrative: A Digital Humanities (DH) Approach to Institutional Interpreters’ Mediation.
Frontiers in Psychology 13
Gu, Chonglong & Rebecca Tipton
2020. (Re-)voicing Beijing’s discourse through self-referentiality: a corpus-based CDA analysis of government interpreters’ discursive mediation at China’s political press conferences (1998–2017).
Perspectives 28:3 ► pp. 406 ff.
Gu, Chonglong & Binhua Wang
2021. Interpreter-mediated discourse as a vital source of meaning potential in intercultural communication: the case of the interpreted premier-meets-the-press conferences in China.
Language and Intercultural Communication 21:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Jones, Alun
2022. Babelic organisations and the interpreters of geopolitical knowledge production.
Political Geography 95 ► pp. 102582 ff.
Liu, Nannan
2022. Speaking in the first-person singular or plural.
Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting
Strani, Katerina
2020.
In Multilingualism and Politics,
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.