Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:3 (2013) ► pp. 400–423

Event-construal in press reports of violence in two recent political protests

A cognitive linguistic approach to CDA

| Lancaster University
In this paper I extend the scope of the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) by incorporating Langacker’s model of Cognitive Grammar in a critical analysis of press reports of violence in two political protests. In doing so, I address issues recently raised against CDA concerning cognitive equivalence. The paper presents an analysis of the alternative conceptualisations of violence invoked in online reports from The Telegraph vs. The Guardian of two recent political protests. Systematic differences in construal are found across several parameters of conceptualisation, including schematisation and various ‘focal adjustments’, which, it is suggested, represent potential sites of ideological reproduction.
Keywords: critical discourse analysis, cognitive grammar, action schemas, focal adjustments, political protests
Published online: 27 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.05har
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2015.  In Crime and Corpus [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 20], Crossref logo
Budd, Kate
2016. Analysing political speeches: rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Critical Discourse Studies 13:1 ► pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Costelloe, Laura
2014. Discourses of sameness: Expressions of nationalism in newspaper discourse on French urban violence in 2005. Discourse & Society 25:3 ► pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, Crossref logo
Díaz-Peralta, Marina
2018. Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:2 ► pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 238 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2016. Event-Frames Affect Blame Assignment and Perception of Aggression in Discourse on Political Protests: An Experimental Case Study in Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw017 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2016. The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2020.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 186 ff. Crossref logo
Jaakola, Minna, Maija Töyry, Merja Helle & Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö
2014. Construing the reader: A multidisciplinary approach to journalistic texts. Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 640 ff. Crossref logo
Koc-Michalska, Karolina & Odile Vallée
2017. Les élections présidentielles : un événement politique en ligne. Sciences de la société :102 ► pp. 150 ff. Crossref logo
Koca-Helvacı, Zeynep Cihan
2016.  In Protest, Social Movements and Global Democracy Since 2011: New Perspectives [Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 39], ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:2 ► pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Lu, Yanying
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Osisanwo, Ayo & Osas Iyoha
2020. ‘We are not terrorist, we are freedom fighters’: Discourse representation of the pro-Biafra protest in selected Nigerian newspapers. Discourse & Society 31:6 ► pp. 631 ff. Crossref logo
Ryazanova-Clarke, Lara
2016. Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Public Discourses. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 Crossref logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2017. Conceptualising force in the context of the Arab Revolutions: A comparative analysis of international mass media reports and Twitter posts. Discourse & Communication 11:2 ► pp. 160 ff. Crossref logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019. Epistemic stancetaking and speaker objectification in a spatio-cognitive discourse world. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3 ► pp. 393 ff. Crossref logo
Wong, May L.-Y.
2017. Analysing aggression of social actors in political protests: combining corpus and cognitive approaches to discourse analysis. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research 9:3 ► pp. 178 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Aeekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2005 “Construing the World: Conceptual Metaphors and Event-Construal in News Stories.” Metaphorik de 9: 6–32.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael
2008 “The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Case of Nominalisation.” Discourse & Society 19: 783–800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
(2006) Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2006 “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005. Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (6): 563–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2005 “Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton, 19–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
(2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fang, Yew-Jin
1994 “‘Riots’ and Demonstrations in the Chinese Press: A Case Study of Language and Ideology.” Discourse & Society 5 (4): 463–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1982 “Frame semantics”. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by , 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger
(1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1996 “On Critical Linguistics”. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 3–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew
(1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
(2007) Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Robert, and Yuezhi Zhou
1994 “Challenging a Master Narrative: Peace Protest and Opinion/Editorial Discourse in the US Press during the Gulf War.” Discourse & Society 5 (4): 509–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart
1973 “A world at one with itself.” In The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media, ed. by Stanley Cohen, and Jock Young, 147–156. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
(2010) Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011a “Moving beyond Metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA: Construal Operations in Immigration Discourse.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 171–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “Force-Interactive Patterns in Immigration Discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA.” Discourse & Society 22 (3): 269–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011c “Legitimising Assertions and the Logico-Rhetorical Module: Evidence and Epistemic Vigilance in Media Discourse on Immigration.” Discourse Studies 13 (6): 751–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
(1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika
(2004) Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Paul Davidson
2008 “Social Exclusion as Conceptual and Grammatical Metaphor: A Cross-Genre Study of British Policy Making.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 307–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Robert Hodge
(1993) Language as Ideology. 2nd edn. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
(1980) Metaphors We Lisve By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lee, Junghi, and Robert Craig
1992 “News as an Ideological Framework: Comparing US Newspapers’ Coverage of Labor Strikes in South Korea and Poland.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 341–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, Douglas, and James Hertog
1992 “The Manufacture of ‘Public Opinion’ by Reporters: Informal Cues for Publication Perceptions of Protest Groups.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 259–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean
(2004) The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana
2011 “Effective vs. Epistemic Stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 193–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Martin
(1986) An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, Graham
1973 “Political Deviance: The Press Presentation of a Militant Mass Demonstration.” In The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media, ed. by Stanley Cohen, and Jock Young, 206–225. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
(2004) Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2007 “Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 543–565. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran
(2003) Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter, and René Dirven
(2007) Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
(2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto
(2002) Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1997 “Whorf ’s Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).” In Evolving Models of Language, ed. by Ann Ryan, and Alison Wray, 100–116. Clevedon: British Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael
(1991) Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trew, Tony
1979 “Theory and Ideology at Work.” In Language and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 94–116. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
(1991) Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998 “Context Models in Discourse Processing”. In The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading, ed. by Herre van Oostendorp, and Susan Goldman, 123–148. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimising Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 10b (1): 83–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
1995 “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2001 “What is CDA about: A Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2006 “Mediation between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 179–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
G20 protests: riot police clash with demonstrators
The Guardian, 1 April 2009. http://​www​.guardian​.co​.uk​/world​/2009​/apr​/01​/g20​-summit​-protests