Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:3 (2013) ► pp. 424444
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Cramer, Rahel
2018. ‘The BP is a great British company’: The discursive transformation of an environmental disaster into a national economic problem. Discourse & Communication 12:2  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Dreyfus, Shoshana & Leanne Dowse
2020. Experiences of parents who support a family member with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: “This is what I deal with every single day”. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 45:1  pp. 12 ff. Crossref logo
Lukin, Annabelle
2013. Evaluating questions in journalism: A case study of the Australian public broadcaster’s coverage of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9:1 Crossref logo
Lukin, Annabelle
2017. Ideology and the text-in-context relation. Functional Linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Ryazanova-Clarke, Lara
2016. Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Public Discourses. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bernstein, B.
(1990) Class, Codes and Control, Volume IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, Joanna
1999An Intimate History of Killing. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Butt, David
1988“Ideational Meaning and the Existential Fabric of a Poem”. In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics: Volume 2, Theory and Application, ed. by Robin Fawcett, and David Young. London and New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
(ed.) 1985aLanguage and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today. London and Dover, N.H.: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
1985b“Introduction”. In Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today, ed. by Paul Chilton. London and Dover, N.H.: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
(2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
von Clausewitz, Carl
1832 [1873]. On War. Link is to online Colonel J.J. Graham’s 1873 translation. Available at: http://​www​.clausewitz​.com​/readings​/OnWar1873​/BK1ch01​.html
Entman, Robert M.
(2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997“Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Firth, John R.
1962“A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930–1955”. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Special Volume of the Philological Society, 1–32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1937[1964]. The Tongues of Men and Speech. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisk, Robert
(2005) The Great War for Civilization: The Conquest of the Middle East. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunter Kress, and Tony Trew
(eds) (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger
(1991) The Language of News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1966“Lexis as a Linguistic Level”. In In Memory of J.R. Firth, ed. by Charles E. Bazzel, 148–162. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1978 [2007]. “An Interpretation of the Functional Relationship between Language and Social Structure”. In Language and Society. Volume 10 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster, 251–264. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2001[2003]. “Is the Grammar Neutral? Is the Grammarian Neutral?” In On Linguistics and Language. Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster, 271–292. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
(1985) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen
(1999) Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language Based Approach to Cognition. London, New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985“Part B.” In Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective, ed. by M.A.K. Halliday, and Ruqaiya Hasan. Geelong, VIC.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
1996“The Ontogenesis of Ideology: An Interpretation of Mother-child Talk”. In Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, ed. by Carmel Cloran, David G. Butt, and Geoff Williams, 133–151. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
1999“Speaking with Reference to Context”. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics: Systemic Perspectives, ed. by Mohsen Ghadessy, 219–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003“Globalization, Literacy and Ideology”. World Englishes 22 (4): 433–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Language, Society and Consciousness. Volume 1 in the Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2009“The Place of Context in a Systemic Functional Model”. In Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, ed. by M.A.K. Halliday, and Jonathan J. Webster, 166–189. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
forthcoming. “Choice Taken in the Context of Realization”. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice ed. Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, and Gerard O’Grady Cambridge CUP
Herman, Edward, and Noam Chomsky
1988[2002]. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunter, and Bob Hodge
(1979) Language as Ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lake, Marilyn, and Henry Reynolds
(eds) (2010) What’s Wrong with Anzac: The Militarisation of Australian History. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold
(1927) Propaganda Technique in the World War. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter
(1921) Public Opinion. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle
2008“The Explanatory Power of the SFL Dimensions in the Study of News Discourse”. In Proceedings of ISFC 35: Voices Around the World. Vol. 1, ed. by Canzhong Wu, Christian Matthiessen, and Maria Herke, 143–171. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
2010““News” and “Register”: A Preliminary Investigation”. In Appliable Linguistics: Texts, Contexts and Meanings. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013“Journalism, Ideology, and Linguistics: The Paradox of Chomsky’s Linguistic Legacy and his “Propaganda Model””. Journalism: Theory, Practice, Critique 14, 96–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “Creating a Parallel Universe: Mode and the Textual Function in the Study of One News Story”. In Recent Studies in Systemic Phonology ed. Wendy Bowcher, and Brad Smith London Equinox
Lukin, Annabelle, Butt, D.G., and C.I.M.M. Matthiessen
2004“Reporting War: A View from Linguistics”. Pacific Journalism Review 10 (1): 58–74.Google Scholar
Martin, James, and Peter R.R. White
(2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., Gray, M.K.
, and et al. 2011“Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books.” Science 331: 176–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newspoll
2003ABC Appreciation Survey. June 2003.Google Scholar
Ponsonby, Arthur
(1928) Falsehood in War-time, Containing an Assortment of Lies Circulated throughout the Nations during the Great War. New York: E.P. Dutton and Co.Google Scholar
Ricks, Thomas
2006Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq. Penguin.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1974Course in General Linguistics, ed. by Charles Bally, and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Trans. by Wade Baskin. Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Turner, B.S.
(ed.) (2006) The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations
2003Historical Review of Developments Relating to Aggression. United Nations Publication. ISBN 92-1-133538-8.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
2008aDiscourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bDiscourse and Power. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2008cSociety and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Teun
2005“Three Models of Interdisciplinarity.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak
2003“Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, 1–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin
(1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Willacy, Mark
2007The View from the Valley of Hell: Four Years in the Middle East. Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2001“What is CDA about – a Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments”. In Methods of Critical Discourse, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and M. Meyer. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Paul Chilton
(2005) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
(eds) 2001) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar