Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:4 (2013) ► pp.508–536

Between public and private

Conversationalisation in French politicians’ blogs

| University of Turku

The article shows that while public discourse is claimed to be undergoing a process of conversationalisation – i.e. adopting features of casual and informal communicative situations – this process does not apply to any great extent to French politicians’ blogs. The parameters investigated in a corpus of 80 politicians’ blog posts during September 2007 are private and informal topics, and conversation-like interaction. The main focus of the study is on the minority of blogs in the material which are in fact conversationalised. These blogs are examined from the point of view of persuasion, as devices in constructing a credible image of the author. The results show that while these few conversationalised blogs construct an image of the author as an ‘ordinary’ person close to the public, the majority of the blogs create an authorial image as a remote political expert. The extent to which the construction of a lay image is successful, however, is questioned in the analysis.

Keywords: Conversationalisation, politicians’ blogs, genre, ethos, peopolisme
Published online: 31 January 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.4.02leh
References
Amossy, Ruth
(2010) La présentation de soi: Ethos et identité verbale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Aristote
1967 [1938]. Rhétorique: Livre I, Translated by Médéric Dufour. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bentivegna, Sara
2006 “Rethinking Politics in the World of ICTs.” European Journal of Communication 21 (3): 331–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323106066638Google Scholar
Braet, Antoine C
1992 “Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Re-Examination.” Argumentation 61: 307–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00154696Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick
(2005) Le discours politique: Les masques du pouvoir. Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
(2008) Entre populisme et peopolisme: Comment Sarkozy a gagné! Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
Coleman, Stephen
2005 “Blogs and the New Politics of Listening.” The Political Quarterly 76 (2): 273–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2005.00679.xGoogle Scholar
Conti, Flavia
(2010) Discours de net-campagne: Blogs et sites des candidat(e)s à la présidentielle française de 2007. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Coutant, Alexandre, and Thomas Stenger
(eds) 2011 “Ces réseaux numériques dits sociaux.” Hermès 59.Google Scholar
Dakhlia, Jamil
2007 “People et politique: Un mariage contre Nature? Critères et enjeux de la peopolisation.” Questions de Communication 121: 259–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.2417Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
2006 “Narrating the Political Self in a Campaign for U.S. Congress.” Language in Society 351: 467–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060222Google Scholar
Eggs, Ekkehard
1999 “Ethos aristotélicien, conviction et pragmatique moderne.” In Images de soi dans le discours: La construction de l’ethos, ed. by Ruth Amossy, 31–59. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1994 “Conversationalisation of the Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer.” In The Authority of the Consumer, ed. by Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercombie, 253–268. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995 [1992]. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2003 [1995]. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Anna Mauranen
1997 “The Conversationalisation of Political Discourse.” In Political Linguistics, ed. by Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 89–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frank, Jane
1990 “You Call That a Rhetorical Question? Forms and Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 723–738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90003-VGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. Scheidt, Sabrina Lois Ann Bonus, and Elijah Wright
2004 “Bridging the Gap: A Genre Analysis of Weblogs.” Proceedings of the 37th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
Janoschka, Anja
2010 “Direct e-communication: Linguistic Weapons in a Political Weblog.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 215–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jereczek-Lipińska, Joanna
2007 “Le blog en politique – outil de démocratie électronique participative?” Glottopol 101: 162–172.Google Scholar
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S., and Gary A. Copeland
(1997) Manipulation of the American Voter: Political Campaign Commercials. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kochin, Michael S
(2009) Five Chapters on Rhetoric: Character, Action, Things, Nothing and Art. University Park (PA): The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Raymond
2004 “‘Vive La Différence’? The Mediation of Politicians’ Public Images and Private Lives in France.” Parliamentary Affairs 57 (1): 24–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsh003Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-hua
2007 “Social Change and Discursive Change: Analysing Conversationalisation of Media Discourse in Taiwan.” Discourse Studies 9 (6): 743–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082577Google Scholar
Landert, Daniela, and Andreas H. Jucker
2011 “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1422–1434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016Google Scholar
Le Bart, Christian
2005 “La proximité selon Raffarin.” Mots. Les langages du politique 771: 13–28.Google Scholar
Lehti, Lotta
2011 “Blogging Politics in Various Ways: A Typology of French Politicians’ Blogs.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6): 1610–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.017Google Scholar
Lehti, Lotta, and Veronika Laippala
2014 “Style in French politicians’ blogs: Degree of formality.” Language@Internet 111: Article 1.
Levinson, Stephen
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, Laurie
2003 “Teaching an Old Genre New Tricks: The Diary on the Internet.” Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 26 (1): 24–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/bio.2003.0028Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R., and Dawn Shepherd
2004 “Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog.” In Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs, ed. by Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff, and Jessica Reyman. St. Paul: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
2009 “Questions for Genre Theory from the Blogo-sphere.” In Genres in the Internet, ed. by Janet Giltrow, and Dieter Stein, 263–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg
(2010) Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Patrona, Marianna
2009 “‘A Mess’ and ‘Rows’: Evaluation in Prime-time TV News Discourse and the Shaping of Public Opinion.” Discourse & Communication 3 (2): 173–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750481309102451Google Scholar
Peterson, Eric E
2011 “How Conversational are weblogs?” Language@Internet 81: article 8.
Rabatel, Alain
2007 “La dialectique du singulier et du social dans les processus de singularisation: style(s), idiolecte, ethos.” Pratiques 135–1361: 15–34.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on conversation, Volumes I & II, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Serfaty, Viviane
2006 “Les blogs et leurs usages politiques lors de la champagne présidentielle de 2004. aux États-Unis.” Mots. Les langages du politique: 801: 25–35.Google Scholar
Starke-Meyerring, Doreen
2007 “The Implications of Blogs for Professional Writing: Speed, Reach, Engagement, and the Art of the Self in the Participatory Web.” In Written Documents in the Workplace, ed. by Denis Alamargot, Patrice Terrier, and Jean-Marie Cellier, 125–138. Amsterdam: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004253254_010Google Scholar
Suomela-Salmi, Eija
2009 “La construction de soi dans les blogs des politiciens français.” In Du côté des langues romanes : Mélanges en l’honneur de Juhani Härmä, ed. by Eva Havu, Mervi Helkkula, and Ulla Tuomarla, 265–281. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina, and Aline Villavicencio
2003 “Toward a Formalisation of Speech Act Functions of Questions in Conversation.” In Questions and Answers: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, ed. by Raffaella Bernardi, and Michael Moortgat, 108–119. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Puleng Thetela
1995 “The Sound of One Hand Clapping: The Management of Interaction in Written Discourse.” Text 15 (1): 103–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103Google Scholar
Vanhala-Aniszewski, Marjatta
2007 “Eurokaput: Venäläisen mediatekstin keskustelunomaistuminen [Conversationalisation of Russian mediatext].” Puhe ja kieli 27 (1): 9–23.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
(2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230233683Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari
2005 “Persuasion Across Genres: Emerging Perspectives.” In Persuasion Across Genres: A Linguistic Approach, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yanoshevsky, Galia
2009 “L’usage des vidéoblogs dans l’élection présidentielle de 2007. Vers une image plurigérée des candidats.” Mots. Les langages du politique 891: 57–68.Google Scholar
2010 “Les réseaux sociaux et l’échange entre l’homme politique et les inter-nautes: le cas de Facebook après les élections présidentielles en France.” Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 5.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ahmar, May
2022. Orality and Identity in the Writing Practices of Politicians, Celebrities, and Activists on Lebanese Twitter. In Digital Orality, ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2015. “Or so the government would have you believe”: Uses of “you” in Guardian editorials. Discourse, Context & Media 10 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.